Analyzing Medicare payments to otologists.

The study objective was to analyze Medicare payment data to otologists compared to otolaryngologists, using the publicly released Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services dataset. Charges, payments, and common Current Procedural Terminology codes were obtained. Otology providers were selected from the roster of the American Otological Society. Descriptive statistics and unequal variance two-tailed t tests were used for comparisons between otologists (n = 147) and otolaryngologists (n = 8,318). The mean overall submitted charge was $204,851 per otology provider and was $211,209 per other otolaryngology providers (non-otologists) (p = 0.92). The mean payment to otologists was $56,191 (range: $297 to $555,274, standard deviation [SD] ±$68,540) and significantly lower (p = 0.005) than $77,275 to otolaryngologists (range: $94 to $2,123,900, SD ±$86,423). The mean submitted charge-to-payment ratio (fee multiplier) per otology provider was 3.87 (range 1.50 to 9.10, SD ±1.70), which was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) than the ratio for otolaryngologists (mean 2.91; range: 1.25 to 17.51, SD ±1.22). Office visit evaluation and management (E&M) codes made up the majority in terms of use and payments. Interestingly, allergy-based services comprised a substantial amount of repeat use among a small subset of otologists. Audiology services were billed by a similar percentage of otologists and other otolaryngologists (52%), but otologists received a significantly higher overall payment for these services.

Thermal Variations of Operative Microscopes in Otology.

Objectives (1) Measure temperature variations achieved by common otomicroscopes. (2) Raise awareness about possible thermal injury during otologic procedures with the advent of newer, high-powered otomicroscopes. (3) Describe optical technology that aims to reduce the potential for thermal injury. Methods A variety of otomicroscopes, with different light sources (ranging from 100W halogen to 300W xenon), were studied. Temperatures were recorded from human auricular skin with a noncontact infrared thermometer at various microscope light intensities and with use of irrigation. Multiple recordings were done at 5-minute intervals, and a working distance of 225 mm was maintained. Results Maximum skin temperatures were found to plateau relatively quickly, with higher-wattage xenon light sources reaching greater temperatures. One-way analysis of variance revealed significant differences in temperatures with decreased light intensities. High-wattage xenon light sources reached significantly higher temperatures when compared with halogen models. Discussion There is substantial variation in maximal skin temperatures reached by otomicroscopes. Temperatures can be decreased to safe levels by reducing light intensity and with use of irrigation. The maximum temperature obtained in our study was 41.4°C. Second-degree skin burns have been described with prolonged exposures to temperatures >44°C. Implications for Practice Given the described potential for burns, surgeons performing procedures on the ear and temporal bone should take precautions to diminish temperature in the operative field.