Direct and continuous dosing of propofol can saturate Ex vivo ECMO circuit to improve propofol recovery.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a cardiopulmonary bypass device that provides life-saving complete respiratory and cardiac support in patients with cardiorespiratory failure. The majority of drugs prescribed to patients on ECMO lack a dosing strategy optimized for ECMO patients. Several studies demonstrated that dosing is different in this population because the ECMO circuit components can adsorb drugs and affect drug exposure substantially. Saturation of ECMO circuit components by drug disposition has been posited but has not been proven. In this study, we have attempted to determine if propofol adsorption is saturable in ex vivo ECMO circuits. METHODS: We injected ex vivo ECMO circuits with propofol, a drug that is highly adsorbed to the ECMO circuit components. Propofol was injected as a bolus dose (50 µg/mL) and a continuous infusion dose (6 mg/h) to investigate the saturation of the ECMO circuit. RESULTS: After the bolus dose, only 27% of propofol was recovered after 30 minutes which is as expected. However, >80% propofol was recovered after the infusion dose which persisted even when the infusion dose was discontinued. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that if ECMO circuits are dosed directly with propofol, drug adsorption can be eliminated as a cause for altered drug exposure. Field of Research: Artificial Lung/ECMO.

Anakinra Removal by Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: An Ex Vivo Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with sepsis are at significant risk for multiple organ dysfunction, including the lungs and kidneys. To manage the morbidity associated with kidney impairment, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may be required. The extent of anakinra pharmacokinetics in CRRT remains unknown. The objectives of this study were to investigate the anakinra-circuit interaction and quantify the rate of removal from plasma. DESIGN: The anakinra-circuit interaction was evaluated using a closed-loop ex vivo CRRT circuit. CRRT was performed in three phases based on the method of solute removal: 1) hemofiltration, 2) hemodialysis, and 3) hemodiafiltration. Standard control samples of anakinra were included to assess drug degradation. SETTING: University research laboratory. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: Anakinra was administered to the CRRT circuit and serial prefilter blood samples were collected along with time-matched control and hemofiltrate samples. Each circuit was run in triplicate to assess inter-run variability. Concentrations of anakinra in each reference fluid were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Transmembrane filter clearance was estimated by the product of the sieving coefficient/dialysate saturation constant and circuit flow rates. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Removal of anakinra from plasma occurred within minutes for each CRRT modality. Average drug remaining (%) in plasma following anakinra administration was lowest with hemodiafiltration (34.9%). The average sieving coefficient was 0.34, 0.37, and 0.41 for hemodiafiltration, hemofiltration, and hemodialysis, respectively. Transmembrane clearance was fairly consistent across each modality with the highest during hemodialysis (5.53 mL/min), followed by hemodiafiltration (4.99 mL/min), and hemofiltration (3.94 mL/min). Percent drug remaining within the control samples (93.1%) remained consistent across each experiment, indicating negligible degradation within the blood. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this analysis are the first to demonstrate that large molecule therapeutic proteins such as anakinra, are removed from plasma with modern CRRT technology. Current dosing recommendations for patients with severe renal impairment may result in subtherapeutic anakinra concentrations in those receiving CRRT.

Interaction of ceftazidime and clindamycin with extracorporeal life support.

BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime and clindamycin are commonly prescribed to critically ill patients who require extracorporeal life support such as ECMO and CRRT. The effect of ECMO and CRRT on the disposition of ceftazidime and clindamycin is currently unknown. METHODS: Ceftazidime and clindamycin extraction were studied with ex vivo ECMO and CRRT circuits primed with human blood. The percent recovery of these drugs over time was calculated to determine the degree of interaction between these drugs and circuit components. RESULTS: Neither ceftazidime nor clindamycin exhibited measurable interactions with the ECMO circuit. In contrast, CRRT cleared 100% of ceftazidime from the experimental circuit within the first 2 h. Clearance of clindamycin from the CRRT circuit was slower, with about 20% removed after 6 h. CONCLUSION: Clindamycin and ceftazidime dosing adjustments are likely required in patients who are supported with CRRT, and future studies to quantify these adjustments should consider the pathophysiology of the patient in combination with the clearance due to CRRT. Dosing adjustments to account for adsorption to ECMO circuit components are likely unnecessary and should focus instead on the pathophysiology of the patient and changes in volume of distribution. These results will help improve the safety and efficacy of ceftazidime and clindamycin in patients requiring ECMO and CRRT.

Remdesivir and GS-441524 Extraction by Ex Vivo Extracorporeal Life Support Circuits.

Patients with severe, COVID-related multi-organ failure often require extracorporeal life support (ECLS) such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). An ECLS can alter drug exposure via multiple mechanisms. Remdesivir (RDV) and its active metabolite GS-441524 are likely to interact with ECLS circuits, resulting in lower than expected exposures. We evaluated circuit-drug interactions in closed loop, ex vivo ECMO and CRRT circuits. We found that mean (standard deviation) recovery of RDV at 6 hours after dosing was low in both the ECMO (33.3% [2.0]) and CRRT (3.5% [0.4]) circuits. This drug loss appears to be due primarily to drug adsorption by the circuit materials and potentially due to metabolism in the blood. GS-441524 recovery at 6 hours was high in the ECMO circuit 75.8% (16.5); however, was not detectable at 6 hours in the CRRT circuit. Loss in the CRRT circuit appears to be due primarily to efficient hemodiafiltration. The extent of loss for both molecules, especially in CRRT, suggests that in patients supported with ECMO and CRRT, RDV dosing adjustments are needed.