Impact of redefining acute myocardial infarction on incidence, management and reimbursement rate of acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Although redefinition for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been proposed few years ago, to date it has not been universally adopted by many institutions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic, prognostic and economical impact of the new diagnostic criteria for AMI. METHODS: Patients consecutively admitted to the emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndromes were enrolled in this study. Troponin T (cTnT) was measured in samples collected for routine CK-MB analyses and results were not available to physicians. Patients without AMI by traditional criteria and cTnT > or = 0.035 ng/mL were coded as redefined AMI. Clinical outcomes were hospital death, major cardiac events and revascularization procedures. In-hospital management and reimbursement rates were also analyzed. RESULTS: Among 363 patients, 59 (16%) patients had AMI by conventional criteria, whereas additional 75 (21%) had redefined AMI, an increase of 127% in the incidence. Patients with redefined AMI were significantly older, more frequently male, with atypical chest pain and more risk factors. In multivariate analysis, redefined AMI was associated with 3.1 fold higher hospital death (95% CI: 0.6-14) and a 5.6 fold more cardiac events (95% CI: 2.1-15) compared to those without AMI. From hospital perspective, based on DRGs payment system, adoption of AMI redefinition would increase 12% the reimbursement rate [3552 Int dollars per 100 patients evaluated]. CONCLUSIONS: The redefined criteria result in a substantial increase in AMI cases, and allow identification of high-risk patients. Efforts should be made to reinforce the adoption of AMI redefinition, which may result in more qualified and efficient management of ACS.

Improvement in clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndromes after the implementation of a critical pathway.

Although several advances have been made in the management of acute coronary syndromes, the adoption of such measures in clinical practice has been suboptimal. The implementation of critical pathways has been suggested as a strategy to improve clinical effectiveness, although its effect is still to be demonstrated. The objective was to evaluate the impact of a critical pathway on the process of care of patients admitted with acute coronary syndromes in a teaching hospital. In a prospective cohort study, patients 30 years or older admitted to the emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndromes were evaluated. Primary outcomes were major cardiovascular events, percutaneous coronary intervention, and in-hospital mortality during 1 semester before and 4 semesters after implementation of the pathway. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for differences between the periods studied and to identify predictors of poor prognosis. Of the 1003 patients evaluated, 150 (15%) had myocardial infarction, and 240 (24%) had unstable angina. There was no difference in clinical characteristics and risk assessment in the periods evaluated. Overall, the quality of care improved after the pathway, with a significant decrease in complication and mortality rates in the last 2 years. In multivariate analysis, patients admitted in the last semester showed fewer major cardiovascular events (odds ratio = 0.74; P = 0.02) and more percutaneous coronary intervention (odds ratio = 1.3; P = 0.03). The implementation of a critical pathway may have a positive impact on the quality of care of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Further studies are needed to evaluate better this and other initiatives aimed at maximizing clinical effectiveness.