RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of psychological interventions in postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) compared to standard rehabilitation. METHODS: The databases searched were PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, and EMBASE were searched from each database inception to May 2023 for published studies. The methodological quality was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment (RoB 2.0) tool. The evidence quality was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: Six papers were included in the meta-analysis. Psychological intervention significantly improved Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia at 3 months (Standard Mean Difference [SMD], -0.51. 95% Confidence Interval [CI], -0.85 to -0.17) and pain (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Pain, Numeric Rating Scale, Visual Analog Scale) at 3 months (SMD, -0.92. 95%CI, -1.69 to -0.15) and at 6 months following ACLR (MD, -1.25. 95%CI, -1.82 to -0.68) when compared with the standard rehabilitation, according to very low-quality data. Self-efficacy and knee strength did not show significant differences. CONCLUSION: Very low-quality evidence suggests that psychological intervention following ACLR yields better short-term outcomes compared to standard rehabilitation, with uncertainty about its clinically significant benefits over standard rehabilitation.
RESUMO
Background Of the shoulder external rotators, the infraspinatus and teres minor are the key muscles that contribute to the dynamic stability of the shoulder. It is crucial to properly measure the strength values to evaluate muscle function and training load for shoulder external rotators. A suspension scale (SPS) can measure the mass of the suspended object, and it may be possible to apply it to measure strength. However, the utility of strength measurements using an SPS has not been clarified in previous studies. In this study, we aimed to investigate the intra-rater reliability of measuring the strength of shoulder external rotators using an SPS and the relationship between strength measurement using an SPS and a handheld dynamometer (HHD). Methodology The participants were 10 healthy males with 20 shoulders (24.5 ± 2.5 years old; height = 172.8 ± 5.4 cm; weight = 69.6 ± 8.1 kg). Upper extremity strength was measured at 90° shoulder abduction, 90° external rotation, 0° horizontal adduction/abduction, 90° elbow flexion, and 0° forearm pronation/supination in the prone position. The isometric strength of shoulder external rotation was measured with the SPS and HHD, and one examiner measured the maximum strength value. The intra-rater reliability of the two methods using SPS and HHD was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC1,2), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change (MDC), and Bland-Altman analysis. The relationship between the SPS and HHD was calculated as the correlation coefficient between the strength values of SPS and HHD. Results The intra-rater reliability of the strength measurement of shoulder external rotators using SPS was ICC1,2 0.98 (95% confidence interval = 0.95-0.99), and SEM and MDC were 0.3 and 0.9, respectively. The measurements using SPS had no fixed and proportional biases. A significant positive correlation was observed between SPS and HHD (r = 0.94, p < 0.01). Conclusions The SPS is an alternative to the HHD for measuring the strength of shoulder external rotators. Thus, measuring the strength of shoulder external rotators using an SPS may be applied as a cost-effective and portable assessment method for shoulder function.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The lumbar multifidus (LMF) muscle, which is involved in the mechanical stability of the lumbar spine, reportedly undergoes atrophy in patients with low back pain. Preventing or mitigating low back pain requires strengthening the LMF muscle; however, methods for triggering selective and significant contraction of this muscle have not been fully studied. This study aims to clarify how, in the hands-and-knees or standing position, the position of the arm and leg on one side affects the activity of the lumbar erector spinae (LES) and LMF muscles. METHODS: We recruited nine adult men with no prior history of low back pain. Measurements were taken in four different postures under varying conditions (that is, one arm and one leg were lifted in either the hands-and-knees or standing position,) as follows: (1) shoulder joint flexion and hip joint extension in the hands-and-knees position; (2) 90° shoulder joint abduction and hip joint abduction in the hands-and-knees position; (3) shoulder joint flexion and hip joint extension in the standing position; and (4) 90° shoulder joint abduction and hip joint abduction in the standing position. The 90° shoulder joint abduction involved simultaneous horizontal abduction, while the hip joint abduction involved simultaneous extension. Muscle activity of the LES and LMF in each posture was measured using a surface electromyograph. RESULTS: Muscle activity of the LMF was significantly higher in 90° shoulder joint abduction and hip joint abduction than in shoulder joint flexion and hip joint extension in both the hands-and-knees and standing positions. The LES muscle showed no significant differences in activity between each posture. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that unilateral 90° shoulder joint abduction and contralateral hip joint abduction in the hands-and-knees and standing positions may produce selective and significant contraction of the LMF muscle.
