RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although strokes are rare in trauma patients, they are associated with worse functional and cognitive outcomes and decreased mobility. Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI)-related strokes and mortality have decreased, likely due to refined screening and treatment algorithms in trauma literature; however, there is a paucity of research addressing non-BCVI strokes in trauma. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence, etiology, and risk factors of stroke in our trauma population in order to identify preventive strategies. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of all adult trauma patients admitted to a level 1 trauma hospital who suffered a stroke during trauma admission from 2010 to 2017. Data were collected from the prospectively maintained trauma and stroke databases. Stroke etiology was determined by a vascular neurologist. RESULTS: Of the 43 674 adult trauma patients admitted during the study period, 99 (0.2%) were diagnosed with a stroke during the index admission. Twenty-one (21%) strokes were due to BCVI. Seventy-eight (79%) strokes were due to non-BCVI etiologies. Patients with non-BCVI strokes were older, less severely injured, and had more medical comorbidities compared with patients with a BCVI stroke. While patients with a BCVI stroke were more likely to suffer multiple traumatic injuries from MVC (76% vs 28%, p<0.001), non-BCVI strokes had more isolated extremity injuries from fall mechanism (55% vs 10%, p<0.001). Over the study period, the age and incidence of stroke and BCVI (p<0.001) increased. However, the rate of BCVI strokes decreased while the rate of non-BCVI strokes increased. DISCUSSION: The incidence of stroke has increased despite aggressive screening and treatment of BCVI. This increase is primarily due to non-BCVI strokes which are associated with advanced age and medical comorbidities after low mechanism traumatic injury. Medical optimization of comorbid conditions during trauma hospitalization will become increasingly important for stroke prevention as the population ages.Level of evidence: Level III.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to identify factors associated with rapid infarct progression during inter-facility transfer for endovascular thrombectomy evaluation and its impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients with anterior circulation large artery occlusion within 24 h of onset transferred within our 17 hospital tele-stroke network were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into fast progressors and slow progressors. Fast progressors were defined as CT ASPECTS score of ≥6 at the referring hospital (RH) and <6 at the hub hospital. Good clinical outcomes were defined as modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) 0-2 at 90 days. Demographic, clinical and radiologic variables associated with fast progressors and good clinical outcomes were identified using multivariable regression models. RESULTS: Among the 190 patients, 44 (23%) patients underwent rapid infarct progression. Higher stroke severity at presentation [aOR, 1.096, 95% CI,1.023, 1.174; p = 0.009], presence of early ischemic changes (CT ASPECT 6-9) at the RH [aOR, 2.721, 95% CI, 1.22, 6.071; pâ¯=â¯0.014] were positively associated, whereas prior ischemic stroke [aOR, 0.272, 95% CI, 0.078, 0.948; pâ¯=â¯0.04] and higher collateral score (2,3,4) [aOR, 0.138, 95%CI, 0.059, 0.324, p=<0.0001] were negatively associated with rapid infarct progression. Fifty-eight (31%) transferred patients had good outcomes. After adjusting for reperfusion status, age [aOR, 0.96, 95% CI, 0.93, 0.98; p=<0.001], initial stroke severity [aOR, 0.87, 95% CI, 0.81, 0.93; p=<0.001], absolute rate of decrease in CT ASPECTS [aOR, 0.38, 95% CI, 0.19, 0.77; pâ¯=â¯0.007] and internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion [aOR, 0.34, 95 %CI, 0.12, 0.94; pâ¯=â¯0.038] were negatively associated with good outcome. CONCLUSION: Higher stroke severity, presence of early ischemic changes at the referring facility, absence of prior stroke, and poor collateral scores (CS 0-1) are the factors associated with rapid infarct progression in the telemedicine transfer cohort. Increasing age, higher stroke severity, higher absolute decrease in CT ASPECTS and ICA occlusion determine poor clinical outcomes.
