Clinical characteristics, surgical treatments, prognosis, and prognostic factors of primary tracheal cancer patients: 20-year data of the National Cancer Center, China.

Background: Tracheal cancer is a rare malignancy of which previous reports are mostly case reports or small series. Herein, we sought to evaluate the clinical characteristics, surgical treatments, and prognosis of surgically treated primary tracheal cancer patients. Methods: Patients with primary tracheal cancer who had received surgery in our center between January 2000 and December 2020 were enrolled. Clinical and surgical features were collected by retrospective review of medical records and follow-up was done by telephone interview. The statistical tests were two-sided. Results: A total of 128 patients were included in the study, 49.2% of whom were male, and the average age was 49.4±13.6 years. The most common histological subtype was adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC; 78/128, 60.9%) followed by squamous cell carcinoma (SCC; 24/128, 18.8%). The percentage of tumors located in the cervical trachea, thoracic trachea, and carina were 50%, 41.4%, and 8.6%, respectively. Among those analyzed, 32.0% of the primary tumors had invaded adjacent organs (E2 disease) and 7.8% of patients had lymph node involvement. Tracheal resection plus reconstruction (with or without thyroidectomy) was the predominant surgical procedure, followed by carinal resection with neocarina. Radical resection (R0) was performed on 61.7% of patients and 63 (49.2%) patients received adjuvant therapy. Compared to ACC, SCC patients had significantly higher risk of tumor of the carina, nodal metastasis, and complications. The 5-year overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 84.5% and factors associated with poor prognosis included carinal tumor [hazard ratio (HR) =10.206; P<0.001], E2 disease (HR =8.870; P=0.001), lymph node metastasis (HR =15.197; P<0.001), and postoperative complications (HR =12.497; P=0.001). Conclusions: The two major subtypes of tracheal cancer are ACC and SCC. Tumor location, extension, lymph node metastasis and complication are survival related factors for surgically treated patients.

What counts more: the patient, the surgical technique, or the hospital? A multivariable analysis of factors affecting perioperative complications of pulmonary lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery from a large nationwide registry.

OBJECTIVES: Inherent technical aspects of pulmonary lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) may limit surgeons' ability to deal with factors predisposing to complications. We analysed complication rates after VATS lobectomy in a prospectively maintained nationwide registry. METHODS: The registry was queried for all consecutive VATS lobectomy procedures from 49 Italian Thoracic Units. Baseline condition, tumour features, surgical techniques, devices, postoperative care, complications, conversions and the reasons thereof were detailed. Univariable and multivariable regressions were used to assess factors potentially linked to complications. RESULTS: Four thousand one hundred and ninety-one VATS lobectomies in 4156 patients (2480 men, 1676 women) were analysed. The median age-adjusted Charlson index of the patients was 4 (interquartile range 3-6). Grade 1 and 2 and Grade 3-5 complications were observed in 20.1% and in 5.8%, respectively. Ninety-day mortality was 0.55%. The overall conversion rate was 9.2% and significantly higher in low-volume centres (<100 cases, P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference between intermediate- and high-volume centres under this aspect. Low-volume centres were significantly more likely to convert due to issues with difficult local anatomy, but not significantly so for bleeding. Conversion, lower case-volume, comorbidity burden, male gender, adhesions, blood loss, operative time, sealants and epidural analgesia were significantly associated with increased postoperative morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: VATS lobectomy is a safe procedure even in medically compromised patients. An improved classification system for conversions is proposed and prevention strategies are suggested to reduce conversion rates and possibly complications in less-experienced centres.

European position statement on lung cancer screening.

Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT can save lives. This European Union (EU) position statement presents the available evidence and the major issues that need to be addressed to ensure the successful implementation of low-dose CT lung cancer screening in Europe. This statement identified specific actions required by the European lung cancer screening community to adopt before the implementation of low-dose CT lung cancer screening. This position statement recommends the following actions: a risk stratification approach should be used for future lung cancer low-dose CT programmes; that individuals who enter screening programmes should be provided with information on the benefits and harms of screening, and smoking cessation should be offered to all current smokers; that management of detected solid nodules should use semi-automatically measured volume and volume-doubling time; that national quality assurance boards should be set up to oversee technical standards; that a lung nodule management pathway should be established and incorporated into clinical practice with a tailored screening approach; that non-calcified baseline lung nodules greater than 300 mm3, and new lung nodules greater than 200 mm3, should be managed in multidisciplinary teams according to this EU position statement recommendations to ensure that patients receive the most appropriate treatment; and planning for implementation of low-dose CT screening should start throughout Europe as soon as possible. European countries need to set a timeline for implementing lung cancer screening.

Screening for lung cancer: are we there yet?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In lung cancer screening with low-dose spiral computed tomography (LDCT), the proportion of stage I disease is 50-85%, and the survival rate for resected stage I disease can exceed 90%, but proof of real benefit in terms of lung cancer mortality reduction must come from the several randomized trials underway in Europe and in the USA. Our purpose is to update the readers on recent progress in medical knowledge in this field. RECENT FINDINGS: Relevant novelties regarding technical and collateral aspects of lung cancer screening have been made available, covering the performance of detection systems and nodule evaluation protocols, means to increase cost-effectiveness, insight into the biology of lung cancer, promotion of minimally invasive and lung-sparing surgical options, effects of screening on smoking habits and early follow-up findings in one randomized trial of LDCT vs. clinical review. CONCLUSION: Early follow-up data suggest that the effect of screening with LDCT on mortality might be smaller than expected, but definitive follow-up data are still awaited from all ongoing randomized trials. Lung cancer screening research is yielding a relevant body of medical knowledge that will be beneficial for other smoking-related diseases and contribute to a better understanding of lung cancer biology.

Protection of right pneumonectomy bronchial sutures with a pedicled thymus flap.

A pedicled flap obtained by mobilizing the right lobe of the thymus was used to protect bronchial sutures in 29 consecutive patients undergoing a right pneumonectomy and in 4 additional patients. Fourteen patients had received preoperative chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. The flap procedure was, in general, easy to do, required an average time of 20.4 minutes, and did not cause added operative morbidity. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, performed in 21 of the 29 patients who had pneumonectomy, showed a viable flap in every instance. One bronchopleural fistula occurred in a pneumonectomy patient after induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in a patient in the pneumonectomy group in whom adult respiratory distress syndrome developed postoperatively and who required prolonged mechanical ventilation.