Patch Technique for Primary Treatment of Type A Carotid Cavernous Fistula: A Case Series and Technical Notes.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of flow diverters (FDs) in the treatment of high-flow Type A carotid cavernous fistulas (CCFs) has been described before mainly as an adjunct to the traditional endovascular techniques and rarely as a stand-alone treatment. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated our experience with FDs as the solo nonadjunctive treatment of Type A CCF with severe cortical venous reflux (CVR). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with Type A CCFs who were treated using FDs' patch technique (PT). Patients' demographics, clinical data, and preoperative and postoperative ocular examination were recorded. The procedure technique, pipeline embolization device (PED) diameters, and immediate and late procedure outcomes were described. RESULTS: Three patients were included in this case series. All patients had history of trauma and presented with decreased visual acuity, cranial nerve II deficit, limited extraocular muscles' movement, and increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Diagnostic angiography was performed, which confirmed high-flow Type A CCF. Endovascular treatment was performed through distal radial access in 2 patients and femoral access in 1 patient by deploying 4 sequentially enlarging PEDs with immediate resolution of the ocular symptoms. Follow-up angiography confirmed complete resolution of CCF in 2 patients. One patient was lost to follow-up; however, angiogram at 4 months demonstrated residual small CCF with significant improvement from postprocedure angiogram. CONCLUSIONS: The patch technique using sequentially enlarging FDs is a reasonable alternative solo technique for the treatment of direct CCF symptoms and results in immediate resolution of CVR while preserving the cavernous sinus anatomy.

Non-stenosing carotid artery plaques in embolic stroke of undetermined source: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: We aim to identify the association between high-risk carotid plaques and their laterality to stroke in ESUS patient population. We also discuss recurrent stroke events and their laterality to the index stroke. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. We reviewed data for patients with ESUS between June 20, 2016, and June 20, 2021. Using computed tomography angiography, we analyzed plaque features that are associated with ESUS, and then, we identified the recurrent stroke events and characterized lateralization to the index stroke. RESULTS: Out of 1779 patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke, we included 152 patients who met the criteria for ESUS. High-risk plaque features were found more often ipsilateral to the stroke side when compared contralaterally: plaque ulceration (19.08% vs 5.26%, p < .0001), plaque thickness > 3 mm (19.08% vs 7.24%, p = 0.001), and plaque length > 1 cm (13.16% vs 5.92%, p = 0.0218). There was also a significant difference in plaque component in which both components (soft and calcified) and only soft plaques were more prevalent ipsilaterally (42.76% vs 23.68% and 17.76% vs 9.21%, respectively, p < .0001). Of the 152 patients, 17 patients were found to have a recurrent stroke event, and 47% (n = 8) had an ipsilateral stroke to the index event. Moreover, stroke was bilateral in 41% of the patients (n = 7), and contralateral in 12% (n = 2). CONCLUSION: High-risk plaque features studied here were more prevalent ipsilaterally to the stroke side in ESUS than contralaterally. Multicenter studies are needed to form precise prediction models and scoring systems to help guide treatment, i.e., choice of medical therapy and/or revascularization.

The role of non-stenosing carotid artery plaques in embolic stroke of undetermined source, is it a silent offender? A review of literature.

PURPOSE: Atherosclerotic cervical internal carotid artery disease is one of the major causes of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attacks. The risk of stroke from mild to moderate stenoses (i.e. <50% stenosis) might be underestimated. There is increasing evidence that plaque morphological features reflect plaque instability that may harbor high risk for embolization. In this narrative review, we will review the literature on plaque features that predict vulnerability beyond the degree of stenosis, discuss the clinical association with stroke, and evaluate the evidence that these lesions serve as a source for embolic stroke of unknown source (ESUS). METHODS: We performed a literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. The terms "embolic stroke of undetermined source" and "plaque morphology" were used either alone or in combination with "non-flow limiting stenosis," "non-stenosing plaques," "high-risk plaque features" or "internal carotid artery plaque." Data on plaque morphology and ESUS were mainly taken from review articles, observational studies including retrospective cohort and cross-sectional studies, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. CONCLUSION: Nonstenosing carotid artery plaques with high-risk features carry a remarkable risk for stroke occurrence and randomized clinical trials are warranted for further evaluation of using carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy to mitigate the risk of stroke.