Risk factors associated with postoperative tympanostomy tube obstruction.

IMPORTANCE: Myringotomy and tympanostomy tube placement for chronic otitis media with effusion is the most common reason for a child to undergo anesthesia in the United States. Postoperative tube obstruction occurs in 1.4% to 36.0% of cases and remains a challenge in achieving middle ear ventilation. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with tube obstruction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective medical record review of 248 patients, mean age 2.54 years, seen between March 2007 and June 2011 in a tertiary care pediatric hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Tympanostomy tube placement and postoperative otic drop therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Tube patency at postoperative visit, number of tube removals and revisions, age, sex, body mass index (BMI), middle ear fluid type at time of surgery, and time between surgery and first postoperative visit were examined. Type of surgery (tympanostomy tube placement alone, adenoidectomy + tympanostomy tube placement, tympanostomy tube placement + adenoidectomy + tonsillectomy) and its effect on tube patency were also reviewed. RESULTS: At first follow-up, 10.6% of patients had occlusion of one or both tubes. No significant association was found between tube patency and a patient's BMI percentile, sex, or procedure type. Patients with no middle ear fluid were more likely to have patent tubes than those who had serous fluid (odds ratio [OR], 3.5; 95% CI, 1.2-10.6; P = .02). A significant inverse correlation was found between patency and time between surgery and follow-up in that patients who had longer follow-up after surgery were less likely to have patent tubes (OR per day of follow-up delay, 0.990; 95% CI, 0.981-0.999; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Tympanostomy tube obstruction was seen in 10.6% of patients. Serous fluid and increased time to postoperative visit were statistically significant indicators for tube occlusion.

Auditory nerve function following cochleitis.

We present a case of temporary cochlear nerve dysfunction due to endocochlear inflammation with subsequent recovery. Retrospective case review at a pediatric tertiary care hospital. A nine-year-old male presented seven years post-cochlear implantation with an electrode array extruded into the external auditory canal. Upon exploration in the operating room, turbid perilymph from the scala tympani was discovered. A new electrode array was implanted. The patient had no discernible neural response telemetry (NRT) responses or auditory perception immediately following the procedure. Continuous but varying stimulation was continued postoperatively. Two months after implantation, he began having some auditory awareness; subsequent mapping resulted in the activation of a limited number of channels. Nine months following reimplantation, NRT demonstrated responses in three channels. Additionally, functional gain testing revealed sound awareness levels in the mild-hearing-loss range and the patient was able to detect and repeat all six Ling sounds. Continuous cochlear nerve stimulation at various levels may aid in function recovery after endocochlear inflammation.

Cochlear implant-mediated perception of nonlinguistic sounds.

OBJECTIVES: The overwhelming majority of test measures to assess cochlear implant (CI) candidacy, efficacy, and progress are based on speech perception. Nonlinguistic sounds, such as alerting and nonspeech human generated sounds, have received comparatively little attention, despite their central importance for daily living and environmental sound awareness. The purposes of this study were to develop and validate a beta test measure of nonlinguistic sound perception and to assess performance in CI users. DESIGN: A beta test of nonlinguistic sound perception, referred to as the NonLinguistic Sounds Test (NLST) was developed. The NLST consists of 50 sound tokens distributed over five categories (animal, human nonspeech, mechanical/alerting, nature, and musical instruments). Both closed-set (category identification) and open-set (token identification) nonlinguistic sound perceptions were examined. Twenty-two postlingually deafened CI users (mean age, 59.4 +/- 10 yrs) were evaluated using common speech perception test measures (Hearing In Noise test and Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant words) and the NLST following a pilot study in which nonlinguistic sound tokens used were selected or eliminated. RESULTS: The NLST was easily administered to all 22 CI subjects. An overall token identification score of 49 +/- 13.5% correct was obtained across all five categories. CI users were able to identify the correct category for 71 +/- 11.5% of tokens. A moderate correlation between speech perception and accuracy of nonlinguistic identification was found (r = 0.519, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that nonlinguistic sounds are difficult for CI users to perceive. The categorization and identification scores suggest that sounds with harmonic structure or sounds with repetitive temporal structure are easier for CI users to perceive. A further developed clinical version of the NLST may be a useful clinical test to measure CI performance and progress, and perception of nonlinguistic sounds should receive greater attention during postimplant auditory rehabilitation.