Posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs tacrolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis: lower incidence of relapse and chronic GVHD.

The ability of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) to facilitate haploidentical transplantation has spurred interest in whether PTCY can improve clinical outcomes in patients with HLA-matched unrelated donors undergoing peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). We investigated our institutional experience using PTCY-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis compared with conventional tacrolimus-based regimens. We compared overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), relapse, nonrelapse mortality, and acute and chronic GVHD in 107 adult patients receiving a PTCY-based regimen vs 463 patients receiving tacrolimus-based regimens for GVHD prophylaxis. The 2 cohorts were well balanced for baseline characteristics except that more patients in the PTCY cohort having received 7-of-8-matched PBSCT. There was no difference in acute GVHD. All-grade chronic GVHD and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD were substantially reduced in patients receiving PTCY compared with in those receiving tacrolimus-based regimens (2-year moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD: 12% vs 36%; P < .0001). Recipients of PTCY-based regimens also had a lower incidence of relapse compared with recipients of tacrolimus-based regimens (25% vs 34% at 2-years; P = .027), primarily in patients who received reduced intensity conditioning. This led to improved PFS in the PTCY cohort (64% vs 54% at 2 years; P = .02). In multivariable analysis, the hazard ratio was 0.59 (P = .015) for PFS and the subdistribution hazard ratio was 0.27 (P < .0001) for moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD and 0.59 (P = .015) for relapse. Our results suggest that PTCY prophylaxis is associated with lower rates of relapse and chronic GVHD in patients who receive HLA-matched unrelated donor PBSCT.

Ibrutinib in Steroid-Refractory Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease, a Single-Center Experience.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a leading cause of late morbidity and mortality after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Corticosteroid-based therapies are a mainstay of its initial treatment but there is no consensus in how to treat steroid-refractory cGVHD. Ibrutinib is a Bruton tyrosine kinase and IL-2-inducible kinase inhibitor thought to affect pathways driving cGVHD, and it was approved for the treatment of refractory cGVHD by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in August 2017 after a landmark phase 1b/2 study. It was the first medication approved for this indication, but how to best treat refractory cGVHD remains an open question, and there has been limited literature on ibrutinib after the FDA approval. This study sought to characterize the utilization and outcomes associated with ibrutinib use in cGVHD via a retrospective single-center study. Fifty-three patients were identified as having been treated with ibrutinib for cGVHD following FDA approval between September 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020, using an institutional data repository. Their records were reviewed for demographics, cGVHD characteristics, and outcomes. For the entire cohort, two-year overall survival was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60% to 86%), with a median follow-up among survivors of 26 months (range, 1.3 to 39.5 months). However, the 2-year failure-free survival (FFS) after initiation of ibrutinib was 9% (95% CI, 2.6% to 20%), and the median FFS was 4.5 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 7.1 months). Events of FFS included treatment change due to lack of response or toxicity, malignant relapse, or non-treatment related mortality. At the time of this report, 11 patients (21%) remained on ibrutinib. At the time of the FFS event or last follow-up, 6 patients (12%) had a complete or partial response, 34 (64%) had stable disease, and 13 (25%) had progressive disease. Ibrutinib use was associated with no reduction in corticosteroid dose between ibrutinib initiation and FFS event or last follow-up (mean difference, 0.00; P = .98). The most frequently used noncorticosteroid cGVHD therapy after ibrutinib was ruxolitinib (n = 14; 33%). The most common adverse events associated with treatment discontinuation were infection (lung, skin, enterocolitis; n = 6), bleeding and bruising (hematoma, epistaxis, gastrointestinal bleed; n = 5), and muscle aches (n = 2). In a real-world setting, ibrutinib is associated with a modest response rate and FFS and its use in a narrower, more targeted patient population may be indicated.