Embo-EVAR: A Technique to Prevent Type II Endoleak? A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Intraprocedural aneurysm sac embolization (embo-EVAR) during endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR) using coils and fibrin glue is a technique for preventing type II endoleak (EII). Our aim is to evaluate feasibility, safety and clinical outcome of this promising approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective clinical case analysis of 72 patients who underwent EVAR during the period 2011-2014. Two groups were compared at 6 and 12 months follow-up with contrast media computed tomography scan and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging: consecutively, 36 patients (group A) treated with classic EVAR and 36 patients (group B) treated with embo-EVAR. Coils were released filling better as possible the aneurysm sac; the embolization was completed by injecting fibrin glue. Device and materials used, differential systemic and sac pressures, presence of any endoleak, and complication were registered. RESULTS: In our experience, we had 100% technical success without surgical conversion. Embo-EVAR was performed, after endograft deployment, in group B patients, all with ratio of Δ-pressures (obtained from Δ-sac pressure/Δ-differential pressure) > 0.16. No early or late complications occurred and mortality was nil. Follow-up was performed with computed tomography-angiography and CEUS at 6 and 12 months. We observed 9 type II and 1 type Ia endoleak in group A and 2 type II and 1 type Ib endoleaks in group B. Mean radiation exposure time was 30.3 min in group A and 43.3 min in group B. EVAR procedure average cost was 9,000 €. The average cost of sac embolization was 1,500€. CONCLUSIONS: Although a randomized study is necessary, embo-EVAR may be a valid approach to prevent type II endoleaks and further complications. Mild costs and exposure-dose increase could be accepted to avoid reinterventions, and in our experience, it could be routinely performed with excellent results.

Graft perforation by a dislocated rib fracture after open thoracoabdominal aortic repair: emergent endovascular and open repair.

PURPOSE: To describe perforation of a Dacron aortic graft due to a post-thoracotomy dislocated rib fracture in a young Marfan patient. CASE REPORT: Six months after a successful open repair of a type II dissecting thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA), a 40-year-old woman with Marfan syndrome underwent elective repair of a post-thoracotomy dislocated rib fracture. During the procedure, the graft ruptured; 2 TAG stent-grafts were emergently implanted to reline the existing aortic graft. The fractured rib was then resected. The postoperative course was uneventful, without residual leak at computed tomography at 3 days. At 18 months, the patient is well, without need of further operations. CONCLUSION: Early correction of any dislocated rib fracture close to a thoracic aortic graft should be considered, especially if the graft is not wrapped by the aneurysm sac. In these patients, in-graft endovascular relining associated with repair of the rib fracture may be a feasible and effective alternative to redo thoracotomy and surgical graft repair. Prior to attempting rib resection, appropriate thoracic endografts should be on hand in case an endovascular bailout is needed.

Energetics of walking in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a proposed functional evaluation protocol.

The energy cost of walking (at 3.2 km x h(-1)) per unit distance (J x kg(-1) x m(-1)) at gradients of 0%, +7%, and +12% and during a progressive test (2% increase in gradient every 2 min), as well as the overall (aerobic plus anaerobic) net cumulative energy consumption and the corresponding maximal exercise duration were assessed in 19 patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and in 13 moderately active control subjects. With a 0% gradient, the energy cost of walking was approximately 40% greater in patients with PAD than in controls (2.93+/-0.52 and 2.13+/-0.33 J x kg(-1) x m(-1) respectively; P <0.01). In contrast, at gradients of +7% and +12%, the energy cost of walking was similar in the two groups (+7%: PAD, 4.15+/-0.74 J x kg(-1) x m(-1); controls, 4.18+/-0.54 J x kg(-1) x m(-1); +12%: PAD, 5.59+/-1.03 J x kg(-1) x m(-1); controls, 5.64+/-0.75 J x kg(-1) x m(-1)). In patients with PAD, maximal exercise duration with gradients of 0%, +7% and +12% was 449+/-254, 322+/-200 and 229+/-150 s respectively, whereas the net cumulative energy consumption at fatigue was almost constant at approximately 1100 J x kg(-1) for all gradients. The greater energy cost of walking in PAD patients compared with controls in level, but not uphill, walking is interpreted as being mainly the consequence of an altered mechanical locomotory pattern, and not of lower metabolic efficiency. For a wide range of loads, net cumulative energy consumption appears to be independent of maximal exercise duration, a finding that provides a practical criterion for assessing the degree of functional impairment of patients with PAD on metabolic grounds.