Treatment algorithm for women with endometriosis in a certified Endometriosis Unit.

INTRODUCTION: Endometriosis is a chronic hormone-dependent disease affecting approximately 25-30% of women in the third and fourth decade. Despite its frequency, it is often detected late. The aim of this overview article was to present a standardized treatment algorithm for an interdisciplinary endometriosis consultation considering conservative and surgical approaches. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Despite the frequency of endometriosis and a high number of publications dealing with the disease there is a lack of evidence in literature for standardized treatment algorithms allowing a rational diagnostic and therapeutic approach. In May 2019 we did a literature search in Medline. While finding 26702 publications under the term "endometriosis" there was only one publication for the search term "endometriosis consultation treatment algorithm." After screening the abstracts 144 publications in English, French or German language had been assessed as relevant for the diagnosis and therapy of endometriosis (143 overview articles and one guideline). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Based on clinical evidence, we have developed a treatment algorithm for women with suspected endometriosis. The diagnosis includes a structured medical history with the identification of endometriosis-typical symptoms and a gynecological examination, if necessary additional examinations. The treatment algorithm is essentially divided into the phase of diagnosis and the phase of therapy as well as the prevention of recurrence or long-term treatment. A multi-professional team of visceral surgery, urology, nutritional medicine, physiotherapy and psychology can be consulted for support. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of endometriosis should be multiprofessional, standardized and reproducible during specialized consultations at certified centers. So far, there are few publications on a standardized and clinically proven treatment algorithm for women with suspected endometriosis. The presented treatment algorithm could be helpful in the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis patients, even at other centers.

Influence of androgen levels on conception probability in patients undergoing fertility treatment: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Primary and secondary sterility have become an issue of increasing importance due to demographic and social changes in society. Data regarding the association between female androgen levels and the probability of successful conception after fertility treatment are sparse and contradictive. This study was designed to assess this clinical question. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center cohort study concentrations of androgens androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosteronsulfat (DHEAS) and testosterone (ng/ml) were investigated in the serum of patients presenting for sterility at the department of reproductive medicine of Saarland University hospital Homburg between January 2015 and December 2017. Androgen levels were correlated with reproductive outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed with the aid of SPSS version 24. Significance for conception rates in dependence of androgen concentration was assessed using Kruskal-Wallis test (significance was estimated with p < 0.05). RESULTS: The laboratory values of a total of 301 patients were examined (64% primary, 36% secondary sterility). Median age at first visit at the fertility department was 32.7 years (range 20-47 years). 64 pregnancies were observed during the study period (conception rate 21.3%). 23 out of 301 patients (7.6%) suffered from hypoandrogenaemia, 248 (82.4%) had normal androgen levels and 30 (10%) showed hyperandrogenaemia (p = 0.25). Regarding patients in whom fertility treatment was successful 3 (4.7%) showed hypoandrogenaemia, 54 (84.4%) were normoandrogenaemic and 7 (10.9%) had hyperandrogenaemia (p = 0.40 Kruskal-Wallis test). CONCLUSIONS: We found no association between female androgen levels and sterility and reproductive outcomes.