An opsonic function of the neutrophil bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein depends on both its N- and C-terminal domains.

The host response to Gram-negative bacterial infection is influenced by two homologous lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-interactive proteins, LPS-binding protein (LBP) and the bacteridical/permeability-increasing protein (BPI). Both proteins bind LPS via their N-terminal domains but produce profoundly different effects: BPI and a bioactive N-terminal fragment BPI-21 exert a selective and potent antibacterial effect upon Gram-negative bacteria and suppress LPS bioactivity whereas LBP is not toxic toward Gram-negative bacteria and potentiates LPS bioactivity. The latter effect of LBP requires the C-terminal domain for delivery of LPS to CD14, so we postulated that the C-terminal region of BPI may serve a similar delivery function but to distinct targets. LBP, holoBPI, BPI-21, and LBP/BPI chimeras were compared for their ability to promote uptake by human phagocytes of an encapsulated, phagocytosis-resistant strain of Escherichia coli. We show that only bacteria preincubated with holoBPI are ingested by neutrophils and monocytes. These findings suggest that, when extracellular holoBPI is bound via its N-terminal domain to Gram-negative bacteria, the C-terminal domain promotes bacterial attachment to neutrophils and monocytes, leading to phagocytosis. Therefore, analogous to the role of the C-terminal domain of LBP in delivery of LPS to CD14, the C-terminal domain of BPI may fulfill a similar function in BPI-specific disposal pathways for Gram-negative bacteria.

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding proteins BPI and LBP form different types of complexes with LPS.

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein (LBP) and bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI) are closely related LPS-binding proteins whose binding to LPS has markedly different functional consequences. To gain better insight into the possible basis of these functional differences, the physical properties of LBP-LPS and BPI-LPS complexes have been compared in this study by sedimentation, light scattering, and fluorescence analyses. These studies reveal dramatic differences in the physical properties of LPS complexed to LBP versus BPI. They suggest that of the two proteins, only LBP can disperse LPS aggegates. However, BPI can enhance both the sedimentation velocity and apparent size of LPS aggregates while inhibiting LPS-LBP binding even at very low (1:40 to 1:20) BPI:LPS molar ratios.