Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 7(10): ofaa426, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33134413

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We investigated the relationship of Epstein-Barr virus viral capsid antigen (EBV VCA-IgA) serostatus with ambient and personal ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and vitamin D exposure. METHODS: Using data from a multicenter case-control study, we included 1026 controls subjects in 2014-2017 in Hong Kong, China. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the association between UVR exposure and EBV VCA-IgA (seropositivity vs seronegativity) were calculated using unconditional logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: We observed a large increase in seropositivity of EBV VCA-IgA in association with duration of sunlight exposures at both 10 years before recruitment and age 19-30 years (adjusted OR = 3.59, 95% CI = 1.46-8.77; and adjusted OR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.04-5.73 for ≥8 vs <2 hours/day; P for trend = .005 and .048, respectively). However, no association of EBV VCA-IgA serostatus with other indicators of UVR exposure was found. In addition, both circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and genetic predicted 25OHD were not associated with EBV VCA-IgA serostatus. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that personal UVR exposure may be associated with higher risk of EBV reactivation, but we did not find clear evidence of vitamin D exposure (observational or genetic), a molecular mediator of UVR exposure. Further prospective studies in other populations are needed to confirm this finding and to explore the underlying biological mechanisms. Information on photosensitizing agents, and serological markers of EBV, and biomarkers related to systemic immunity and inflammation should be collected and are also highly relevant in future studies.

2.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 7052, 2018 05 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29728581

RESUMO

We evaluated the reliability of early life nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) aetiology factors in the questionnaire of an NPC case-control study in Hong Kong during 2014-2017. 140 subjects aged 18+ completed the same computer-assisted questionnaire twice, separated by at least 2 weeks. The questionnaire included most known NPC aetiology factors and the present analysis focused on early life exposure. Test-retest reliability of all the 285 questionnaire items was assessed in all subjects and in 5 subgroups defined by cases/controls, sex, time between 1st and 2nd questionnaire (2-29/≥30 weeks), education (secondary or less/postsecondary), and age (25-44/45-59/60+ years) at the first questionnaire. The reliability of items on dietary habits, body figure, skin tone and sun exposure in early life periods (age 6-12 and 13-18) was moderate-to-almost perfect, and most other items had fair-to-substantial reliability in all life periods (age 6-12, 13-18 and 19-30, and 10 years ago). Differences in reliability by strata of the 5 subgroups were only observed in a few items. This study is the first to report the reliability of an NPC questionnaire, and make the questionnaire available online. Overall, our questionnaire had acceptable reliability, suggesting that previous NPC study results on the same risk factors would have similar reliability.


Assuntos
Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/etiologia , Sistemas On-Line , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Feminino , Hong Kong/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Sistemas On-Line/normas , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Adulto Jovem
3.
Ann Occup Hyg ; 60(7): 885-99, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27250109

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In community-based epidemiological studies, job- and industry-specific 'modules' are often used to systematically obtain details about the subject's work tasks. The module assignment is often made by the interviewer, who may have insufficient occupational hygiene knowledge to assign the correct module. We evaluated, in the context of a case-control study of lymphoid neoplasms in Asia ('AsiaLymph'), the performance of an algorithm that provided automatic, real-time module assignment during a computer-assisted personal interview. METHODS: AsiaLymph's occupational component began with a lifetime occupational history questionnaire with free-text responses and three solvent exposure screening questions. To assign each job to one of 23 study-specific modules, an algorithm automatically searched the free-text responses to the questions 'job title' and 'product made or services provided by employer' using a list of module-specific keywords, comprising over 5800 keywords in English, Traditional and Simplified Chinese. Hierarchical decision rules were used when the keyword match triggered multiple modules. If no keyword match was identified, a generic solvent module was assigned if the subject responded 'yes' to any of the three solvent screening questions. If these question responses were all 'no', a work location module was assigned, which redirected the subject to the farming, teaching, health professional, solvent, or industry solvent modules or ended the questions for that job, depending on the location response. We conducted a reliability assessment that compared the algorithm-assigned modules to consensus module assignments made by two industrial hygienists for a subset of 1251 (of 11409) jobs selected using a stratified random selection procedure using module-specific strata. Discordant assignments between the algorithm and consensus assignments (483 jobs) were qualitatively reviewed by the hygienists to evaluate the potential information lost from missed questions with using the algorithm-assigned module (none, low, medium, high). RESULTS: The most frequently assigned modules were the work location (33%), solvent (20%), farming and food industry (19%), and dry cleaning and textile industry (6.4%) modules. In the reliability subset, the algorithm assignment had an exact match to the expert consensus-assigned module for 722 (57.7%) of the 1251 jobs. Overall, adjusted for the proportion of jobs in each stratum, we estimated that 86% of the algorithm-assigned modules would result in no information loss, 2% would have low information loss, and 12% would have medium to high information loss. Medium to high information loss occurred for <10% of the jobs assigned the generic solvent module and for 21, 32, and 31% of the jobs assigned the work location module with location responses of 'someplace else', 'factory', and 'don't know', respectively. Other work location responses had ≤8% with medium to high information loss because of redirections to other modules. Medium to high information loss occurred more frequently when a job description matched with multiple keywords pointing to different modules (29-69%, depending on the triggered assignment rule). CONCLUSIONS: These evaluations demonstrated that automatically assigned modules can reliably reproduce an expert's module assignment without the direct involvement of an industrial hygienist or interviewer. The feasibility of adapting this framework to other studies will be language- and exposure-specific.


Assuntos
Descrição de Cargo , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Ocupações/classificação , Software , Algoritmos , Ásia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Solventes/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...