RESUMO
Over 60% of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients who receive chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells will experience disease progression. There is no standard next line of therapy and information in this setting is scarce and heterogeneous. We analyzed 387 R/R LBCL patients who progressed after CAR T cells from July 2018 until March 2022 in Spain and the United Kingdom. Median overall survival (OS) was 5.3 months, with significant differences according to the interval between infusion and progression (<2 months [1.9 months], 2-6 months [5.2 months], and >6 months [not reached]). After progression, 237 (61%) patients received treatment. Focusing on the first subsequent therapy, overall (complete) response rates were 67% (38%) for polatuzumab-bendamustine-rituximab (POLA), 51% (36%) for bispecific antibodies (BsAb), 45% (35%) for radiotherapy (RT), 33% (26%) for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), 25% (0%) for lenalidomide (LENA), and 25% (14%) for chemotherapy (CT). In terms of survival, 12-month progression-free survival and OS was 36.2% and 51.0% for POLA, 32.0% and 50.1% for BsAb, 30.8% and 37.5% for RT, 29.9% and 27.8% for ICI, 7.3% and 20.8% for LENA, and 6.1% and 18.3% for CT. Thirty-two (14%) patients received an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant with median OS not reached after a median follow-up of 15.1 months. In conclusion, patients with R/R LBCL who progress within the first 2 months after CAR T-cell therapy have dismal outcomes. Novel targeted agents, such as polatuzumab and BsAbs, can achieve prolonged survival after CAR T-cell therapy failure.
RESUMO
In this retrospective study, CAR T-cells remained effective in relapsed/refractory LBCL patients after prior exposure to bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) targeting different antigens. These results are relevant to clinical practice, particularly given the increasing use of BsAbs in earlier treatment lines.
RESUMO
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a promising treatment option for relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, only a subset of patients will present long-term benefit. In this study, we explored the potential of PET-based radiomics to predict treatment outcomes with the aim of improving patient selection for CAR T-cell therapy. We conducted a single-center study including 93 consecutive R/R LBCL patients who received a CAR T-cell infusion from 2018 to 2021, split in training set (73 patients) and test set (20 patients). Radiomics features were extracted from baseline PET scans and clinical benefit was defined based on median progression-free survival (PFS). Cox regression models including the radiomics signature, conventional PET biomarkers and clinical variables were performed for most relevant outcomes. A radiomics signature including 4 PET-based parameters achieved an AUC = 0.73 for predicting clinical benefit in the test set, outperforming the predictive value of conventional PET biomarkers (total metabolic tumor volume [TMTV]: AUC = 0.66 and maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax]: AUC = 0.59). A high radiomics score was also associated with longer PFS and OS in the multivariable analysis. In conclusion, the PET-based radiomics signature predicted efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy and outperformed conventional PET biomarkers in our cohort of LBCL patients.
