Challenges in the Treatment of Psychotic Bipolar Depression.

BACKGROUND: Psychotic bipolar depression (PBD) is a prevalent yet understudied psychiatric illness, and there are no specific guidelines or Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for its treatment. Recent studies suggest that some antipsychotics and mood stabilizers may be effective in managing bipolar depression; however, their effectiveness for PBD remains unclear. Given the urgent need for more focused research for managing PBD, we conducted a literature review to summarize the existing literature on PBD. METHODS: We conducted an electronic literature search from the 1960s to 2023, utilizing PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google, and selected studies based on their relevance to PBD. FINDINGS: PBD is a complex disorder, with 50%-75% of patients with bipolar disorder exhibiting psychotic features. This likelihood increases among those with a history of psychotic mania. Treatment guidelines often recommend a combination of mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, or electroconvulsive therapy, but they do not specify a first-line treatment. PBD symptoms can be masked by mixed high mood and energy feelings, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment while increasing suicide risk. Limited research has evaluated outcomes of various treatments for PBD, and despite the lack of evidence for superior efficacy, in clinical practice, antipsychotics are frequently prescribed. Notably, combining an antipsychotic with selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors or tricyclic antidepressants may be effective, but including a mood stabilizer is necessary. CONCLUSION: PBD poses a significant challenge in mental health due to its severity and the lack of consensus on optimal treatment approaches. There is a critical need for more dedicated clinical trials and research to answer key questions about the effective treatment of acute PBD, ideal follow-up care, traits of responders to different therapies, and decision models for subsequent treatments.

A Cross-Sectional Survey of the Zika Virus and its Prevention: The Knowledge, Thoughts, and Beliefs of a Community of Residents in Caguas, Puerto Rico.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore the knowledge, thoughts, and beliefs regarding the Zika virus and its prevention in a community of residents in the municipality of Caguas, Puerto Rico, and elicit their concerns and perceptions of risk. METHODS: A quantitative, non experimental, descriptive, cross-sectional correlational study was conducted in a community in Caguas, Puerto Rico. A structured questionnaire was administered to a sample of 158 residents, aged 21 and older, who participated voluntarily. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 17 via univariate and bivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of 158 surveyed, 64.6% were women; with a population average of 53.85 years. Of the respondents who believed that they would be affected in some way if they were infected by the Zika virus, over half (52.3%) felt that the virus represented a significant threat to their emotional stability. Of those who perceived emotional threat, 39.5% (n=32) continued to study after completing high school (X2=9.217, p=0.027), 57.9% (n=55) had private health insurance (X2=6.325; p=0.042), and 67.9% (n=55) reported it was little or unlikely to become infected (X2= 6.783; p=0.034). Out of those concerned, 57.4% (n=54) considered Zika very or extremely severe (X2=22.827, p<0.001) and 98.9% (n=93) clean the house surroundings as a preventive measure (X2 = 4.951, p=0.026). Lack of interest was the most common reason identified for not complying with preventive actions by the residents (89.2%). CONCLUSION: The underestimation both of the risk concerning the Zika virus and of its consequences was evident. This study reaffirms the need to develop a network that effectively and constantly communicates risk estimates, doing so while addressing the specific needs within the communities served by that network. Community interventions aimed at improving the benefits of and reducing the risks associated with and the perceived barriers to preventive behaviors are needed.