The natural history of non-functioning pituitary adenomas: A meta-analysis of conservatively managed tumors.

BACKGROUND: Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA) are often discovered incidentally. The natural history of NFPA is not well understood, obfuscating evidence-based management decisions. Meta-data of radiographically followed NFPA may help guide conservative versus operative treatment of these tumors. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Ovid for studies with NFPA managed nonoperatively with radiographic follow-up. Studies on postoperative outcomes after NFPA resection and studies that did not delineate NFPA data from functional pituitary lesions were excluded. NFPA were divided into micro- and macroadenomas based on size at presentation. We performed a meta-analysis of aggregate data for length of follow-up, change in tumor size, rate of apoplexy, and need for resection during follow-up. RESULTS: Our database search yielded 1787 articles, of which 19 were included for final analysis. The studies included 1057 patients with NFPA followed radiographically. Macroadenomas were significantly more likely to undergo growth (34% vs. 12%; p < 0.01) or apoplexy (5% vs. < 1%; p = 0.01) compared to microadenomas. Resection was performed in 11% of all NFPA patients during follow-up regardless of size at presentation. Meta-regression showed that surgery during follow-up was associated with macroadenomas and negatively associated with microadenomas that decreased in size. CONCLUSION: Low-quality evidence suggests that NFPA classified as macroadenomas have an increased rate of growth and apoplexy during follow-up compared to microadenomas. A significant minority of all NFPA patients ultimately underwent surgery. In select patients, nonoperative management may be the appropriate strategy for NFPA. Macroadenomas may require closer follow-up.

Treatment of large infectious extracranial carotid artery pseudoaneurysms in children: a systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Extracranial carotid artery pseudoaneurysm is a rare complication of deep neck space infection, and no evidence-based treatment guidelines are available in the literature. METHOD: To clarify the existing experience of the different treatment strategies, the authors performed a systematic literature search using the PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, and Scopus databases in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to review all reported cases of pediatric patients with infectious carotid pseudoaneurysms larger than 1 cm. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients with a median age of 4 years (range 6 months-15 years) were identified. Eighteen patients (69.2%) were treated with endovascular methods, 6 patients (23.1%) with surgical methods, 1 patient (3.8%) with a hybrid endovascular/surgical approach, and 1 patient (3.8%) with conservative management. Recurrence of the pseudoaneurysm occurred in 2 cases (7.7%), both of which were successfully retreated. Of the 6 patients (23.1%) who presented with pre-procedure neurologic deficits, 3 patients had complete or near complete resolution of symptoms after intervention and 3 patients had persistent deficits at last follow-up. Four patients (15.4%) experienced new neurologic deficits post-procedure that resolved at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: The endovascular treatment tends to be the preferred option to treat a large or giant infectious pseudoaneurysm of the carotid artery in the pediatric patient. However, more evidence is necessary to elucidate comparative safety and efficacy profiles of endovascular and surgical management strategies.