Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Fed Pract ; 41(2): 40-43, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38835927

RESUMO

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has great potential to improve health care quality, safety, efficiency, and access. However, the widespread adoption of health care AI needs to catch up to other sectors. Challenges, including data limitations, misaligned incentives, and organizational obstacles, have hindered implementation. Strategic demonstrations, partnerships, aligned incentives, and continued investment are needed to enable responsible adoption of AI. High reliability health care organizations offer insights into safely implementing major initiatives through frameworks like the Patient Safety Adoption Framework, which provides practical guidance on leadership, culture, process, measurement, and person-centeredness to successfully adopt safety practices. High reliability health care organizations ensure consistently safe and high quality care through a culture focused on reliability, accountability, and learning from errors and near misses. Observations: The Veterans Health Administration applied a high reliability health care model to instill safety principles and improve outcomes. As the use of AI becomes more widespread, ensuring its ethical development is crucial to avoiding new risks and harm. The US Department of Veterans Affairs National AI Institute proposed a Trustworthy AI Framework tailored for federal health care with 6 principles: purposeful, effective and safe, secure and private, fair and equitable, transparent and explainable, and accountable and monitored. This aims to manage risks and build trust. Conclusions: Combining these AI principles with high reliability safety principles can enable successful, trustworthy AI that improves health care quality, safety, efficiency, and access. Overcoming AI adoption barriers will require strategic efforts, partnerships, and investment to implement AI responsibly, safely, and equitably based on the health care context.

2.
J Patient Saf ; 18(1): 64-70, 2022 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33044255

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Applying high-reliability organization (HRO) principles to health care is complex. No consensus exists as to an effective framework for HRO implementation or the direct impact of adoption. METHODS: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) National Center for Patient Safety established the high-reliability hospital (HRH) model for HRO adoption and piloted HRH in collaboration with the Truman VA Medical Center (Truman) during a 3-year intervention period (January 1, 2016-December 31, 2018). High-reliability hospital components are as follows: annual patient safety (PS) assessment, annual PS culture survey, annual root cause analysis training, daily leadership walk-arounds, monthly PS forum, annual processes standardization review, Just Culture training, unit-based Clinical Team Training, unit-based continuous improvement projects, and annual Clinical Team Training simulation education. The impact of HRH was examined using a PS Culture Survey, PS event reporting, and quality outcomes of standardized mortality rate and complication rate. RESULTS: Truman internally improved PS culture and PS event reporting rates resulting in outcomes better than all VHA facilities (All VHA; P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). Low-harm PS event reporting increased (P < 0.001); however, serious safety event rate remained unchanged versus All VHA. Significant improvement in Truman standardized mortality rate and complication rate versus All VHA occurred immediately and were sustained through intervention (slopes, P < 0.001 and P < 0.020; respectively). CONCLUSIONS: High-reliability hospital is an effective framework for HRO implementation and will be applied to 18 additional VHA sites. Based on these results, the expected outcome will be improved PS culture and overall PS event reporting. The impact of HRH on serious safety event rate and quality measures requires further study.


Assuntos
Segurança do Paciente , Gestão da Segurança , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Análise de Causa Fundamental
3.
Am J Med Qual ; 36(6): 422-428, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34010164

RESUMO

Provider burnout is a significant health care concern. It is unclear whether high reliability organization (HRO) practices can prevent it. The Truman Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) undertook an initiative implementing HRO principles and assessed for impact on burnout metrics. This became known as the Transformative HRO Initiative Via Employee Engagement (THRIVE2) model. THRIVE2 consisted of Just Culture training, Clinical Team Training, and continuous process improvement through Lean. Truman VAMC was compared with other Veterans Health Affairs (VHA) facilities regarding burnout and employee satisfaction metrics. Truman VAMC saw significant changes in multiple HRO metrics (P < 0.001) as well as improvements in work group psychological safety and employee exhaustion (P < 0.001). High burnout rates decreased by 52% (6.2%-2.95%; P < 0.001). Truman VAMC went from 75th to the No. 1 ranked VHA facility regarding Best Places to Work. These findings have significant national policy implications given the effects of burnout.


Assuntos
Organizações de Alta Confiabilidade , Local de Trabalho , Esgotamento Psicológico , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...