Analysis of the clinical problems in parkinsonism and the complications of long-term levodopa therapy.

We evaluated the current status of 131 patients with idiopathic parkinsonism who were receiving levodopa therapy. The residual parkinsonian symptoms and signs were tabulated, as were the adverse effects from medication. Response to therapy was correlated with duration of the disease and with duration of treatment. Patients with on-off or wearing-off effects were likely to have been treated for 4 years or longer. Patients treated with levodopa for 4 to 8 years were significantly more impaired with parkinsonism than patients treated for 0 to 3 years, even when patients were matched for total duration of disease. These data suggest that the deterioration of responsiveness after several years of levodopa therapy may be due to the therapy itself. Our findings support the concept that utilization of levodopa therapy should be delayed until a patient becomes significantly impaired in occupational or social situations.

The role of bromocriptine in the treatment of parkinsonism.

Fifty-three patients with parkinsonism, either with intractable symptoms despite optimum-dosage levodopa therapy or with adverse effects from levodopa limiting its usefulness, were treated with bromocriptine, with gradually increasing doses until benefit or adverse effect was encountered. All were initially maintained on optimal levodopa therapy. Improvement was seen in 26 patients, of whom 19 (36 percent of the total 53 patients) had sustained improvement. Effective doses of bromocriptine ranged from 5 to 90 mg per day. Improvement occurred in all categories of clinical problems, including patients who lost some benefit from chronic levodopa therapy as well as those with adverse effects from levodopa. A high incidence (70 percent) of adverse effects of bromocriptine limited the usefulness of this drug. Since one cannot predict which patients might benefit from bromocriptine, this drug is worth a trial in patients not doing well on levodopa therapy if other means to improve their condition are not successful.

Normocalcemic tetany. A problem of erethism.

A boy with neonatal and childhood convulsions had prolonged attacks of tetany in adolescence. There was no abnormality of serum calcium or magnesium, and treatment with these cations was ineffective. There was no respiratory alkalosis, and attacks occurred when the patient had not taken anticonvulsant drugs for years. Serum parathormone content and renal responses to the administration of parathormone were normal. "Normocalcemic tetany" seems an appropriate name for the condition, which was probably genetic since the patient's brother and mother had signs of latent tetany and the brother had a convulsive disorder. The cause of the syndrome is not known, but it seems to be an abnormal response of neural membranes rather than an abnormality of calcium homeostasis.

Primary sensory symptoms in parkinsonism.

Forty-three of 101 outpatients with parkinsonism reported that they regularly experienced primary sensory symptoms, i.e., spontaneous abnormal sensations not caused by somatic disease. This is in contrast to similar symptoms reported by only 8 percent of a control population. The most striking and severe symptom was burning of the trunk and proximal extremities, occurring in 11 patients. Twenty-nine patients reported spontaneous pain; a variety of other paresthesialike sensations, e.g., tingling, numbness, and formication, occurred in 32 patients. These subjective sensory phenomena were not associated with sensory loss or autonomic or motor signs. In 20 percent of affected individuals (9 percent of the total), sensory symptoms preceded the onset of the movement disorder, causing difficulty in diagnosis. It is concluded that at least some sensory symptoms originate within the nervous system as a manifestation of the disease process and are not secondary effects of the motor disorder.

Long-term evaluation of amantadine and levodopa combination in parkinsonism by double-blind corssover analyses.

Twenty-three patients with Parkinson's disease participated in long-term, double-blind evaluations of the effectiveness and side effects of amantadine in combination with levodopa therapy. Sixteen patients completed the year-long study, which consisted of randomized crossover of amantadine and placebo before levodopa was begun and again after 5 and 11 months of continuous levodopa therapy. Initially, 16 of 23 patients (70 percent) had a favorable response to amantadine during the first crossover period. After 1 year of levodopa, at least eight of 16 patients (50 percent) responded favorably to amantadine compared with placebo. Some of the amantadine responders previously had been nonresponders, and vice versa. The response to amantadine was quantitatively similar in the responders even after the patients had been receiving levodopa therapy. Amantadine should be tried as a therapeutic agent in addition to levodopa for parkinsonism if more beneficial effect is desired, even if amantadine was previously ineffective in the same patient.