Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 41(9): 1077-89, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22575179

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to compare two different types of surgical approaches, intrasinus and extramaxillary, for the placement of zygomatic implants to treat atrophic maxillae. A computational finite element simulation was used to analyze the strength of implant anchorage for both approaches in various occlusal loading locations. Three-dimensional models of the craniofacial structures surrounding a region of interest, soft tissue and framework were developed using computed tomography image datasets. The implants were modelled using computer-aided design software. The bone was assumed to be linear isotropic with a stiffness of 13.4 GPa, and the implants were assumed to be made of titanium with a stiffness of 110 GPa. Masseter forces of 300 N were applied at the zygomatic arch, and occlusal loads of 150 N were applied vertically onto the framework surface at different locations. The intrasinus approach demonstrated more satisfactory results and could be a viable treatment option. The extramaxillary approach could also be recommended as a reasonable treatment option, provided some improvements are made to address the cantilever effects seen with that approach.


Assuntos
Desenho Assistido por Computador , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/métodos , Planejamento de Prótese Dentária/métodos , Seio Maxilar/cirurgia , Zigoma/cirurgia , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Simulação por Computador , Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante , Análise do Estresse Dentário , Prótese Total , Análise de Elementos Finitos , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Modelos Anatômicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...