Sequence-dependence of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in advanced and recurrent gastric cancer.

This randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the safety and effectiveness of different sequences of treatment with cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with unresectable advanced and post-operative recurrent gastric cancer. Patients with unresectable advanced or post-operative recurrent gastric cancer were randomly assigned by a registration center to group A or B. Group A received CDDP (80 mg/m(2)) as a continuous 2-h intravenous infusion on day 1 and 5-FU (700 mg/m(2)) as a continuous intravenous infusion on days 2-5. Group B was given 5-FU (700 mg/m(2)) as a continuous intravenous infusion on days 1-4, followed by CDDP (80 mg/m(2)) as a continuous 2-h intravenous infusion on day 5. Each course of chemotherapy was repeated every 28 days. A total of 74 patients were enrolled. One patient died accidentally, and 5 could not be evaluated. Response was assessable in 68 patients. The response rate was 31.3% (10/32) in group A as compared with 13.9% (5/36) in group B. Although the response rate was higher in Group A, the difference was not significant (p=0.085). The response rate in patients with diffuse type tumors was significantly lower in group B. There was no difference between the groups in response among patients with intestinal type tumors. The median overall survival was 239 and 174 days and time to progression was 175 and 140 days in group A and group B, respectively. Although there were trends toward longer survival and time to progression in group A, the differences between the groups were not statistically significant. There was also no difference in the type or incidence of adverse reactions. The results of this controlled study indicate that the overall response rate was slightly but not significantly higher in patients who received CDDP before 5-FU. Among patients with diffuse type tumors, the response rate was significantly lower when 5-FU was administered before CDDP. Our results suggest that CDDP should be given before 5-FU in patients with gastric cancer when treated with a combination of CDDP and 5-FU.

Comparison between celiac plexus block and morphine treatment on quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer pain.

Twenty-one patients with pancreatic cancer pain were studied to evaluate the effectiveness of celiac plexus block (CPB) on pain relief and quality of life (QOL), compared to the traditional NSAID-morphine treatment. The criteria were morphine consumption, visual analogue pain scale (VAS), performance status (PS) determined by medical and nursing staffs, and answers to QOL questionnaires. Morphine consumption, VAS, PS, and self-assessed QOL scores were taken when the administration of morphine was necessary for pain relief and those scores were used as control. Morphine consumption and the VAS score were recorded at regular weekly intervals and the PS and QOL scores were measured every 2 weeks thereafter. CPB was performed within 2-3 days after the control measurement. The VAS scores of the patients receiving CPB (n = 10) were statistically lower for the first 4 weeks after the procedure than those of the patients receiving the standard NSAID-morphine treatment (n = 11) during the same time period after the control measurement. Morphine consumption was significantly lower in weeks 4-7 (inclusive) following the procedure in the CPB group and continued to be lower thereafter, though not significantly so. Although the PS score slightly improved at the 2nd week after CPB, it was not improved by the start of the NSAID-morphine treatment. Self-assessed QOL scores did not ameliorate statistically after CPB; however, they did deteriorate remarkably in the patients treated only with morphine-NSAID during their survival periods, while they deteriorated only slightly in the CPB group. There were fewer side effects after CPB. These results indicate CPB does not directly improve QOL in patients with pancreatic cancer pain, but it may prevent deterioration in QOL by the long-lasting analgesic effect, limitation of side effects and the reduction of morphine consumption, compared to treatment only with NSAID-morphine.