Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with Toupet fundoplication (T-sleeve): A short report of a Japanese obesity patient with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most frequently performed procedure in bariatric-metabolic surgery (BMS) worldwide, accounting for approximately 90% of BMS procedures in Japan. While numerous studies have reported on the safety and efficacy of LSG, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains a major postoperative complication. Although Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is preferred for severe obesity with GERD, it is less suitable for Japanese patients who have a higher risk of gastric cancer due to the remnant stomach which is difficult to observe with esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy. To address de novo and exacerbation GERD after LSG, we conducted LSG with Toupet fundoplication (T-sleeve) for Japanese patients with severe obesity. In our first T-sleeve case, the patient demonstrated sufficient weight loss and improved GERD following surgery. Hence, we suggest that T-sleeve is a feasible option for Japanese patients with obesity and concurrent GERD.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients undergoing esophagectomy following neoadjuvant DCF therapy.

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence suggests that expression levels of tumor-infiltrating (TI) cells may play a prognostic role in patients with esophageal cancer who have undergone esophagectomy. However, its effect on patients undergoing neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy followed by esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to elucidate the prognostic impact of TI cells in patients who underwent esophagectomy following neoadjuvant DCF therapy. METHODS: Overall, 81 patients with ESCC who underwent curative esophagectomy following neoadjuvant DCF therapy were included. The number of TI CD8+ cells was determined using light microscopy at ×400 in tumor invasive margins. Receiver operative characteristic curve was used to determine the cutoff values for mortality for continuous variables; the patients were separated into high and low TI CD8+ cell groups and their backgrounds and clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Overall and relapse-free survival were significantly worse in the TI CD8+-low group than that in the TI CD8+-high group (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that positive ypN (hazard ratio [HR], 3.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-9.02) and low TI CD8+ cell levels (HR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.31-5.85) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Furthermore, positive venous invasion (HR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.29-5.35) and low TI CD8+ cell levels (HR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.70-5.46) were significant prognostic factors for relapse-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Low TI CD8+ cell level was a prominent prognostic factor for patients with ESCC undergoing neoadjuvant DCF therapy followed by esophagectomy.

Anatomical and anastomotic viability indexes for stratifying the risk of anastomotic leakage in esophagectomy with retrosternal reconstruction.

Background: Risk prediction of anastomotic leakage using anatomical and vascular factors has not been well established. This study aimed to assess the anatomical and vascular factors affecting the hemodynamics of the gastric conduit and develop a novel risk stratification system in patients undergoing esophagectomy with retrosternal reconstruction. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 202 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent subtotal esophagectomy with gastric tube retrosternal reconstruction between January 2008 and December 2020. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL), including the anatomical index (AI) and anastomotic viability index (AVI), were evaluated using a logistic regression model. Results: According to the logistic regression model, the independent risk factors for AL were preoperative body mass index ≥23.6 kg/m2 (odds ratio [OR], 7.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.44-26.00; P < 0.01), AI <1.4 (OR, 23.90; 95% CI, 5.02-114.00; P < 0.01), and AVI <0.62 (OR, 8.02; 95% CI, 2.57-25.00; P < 0.01). The patients were stratified into four AL risk groups using AI and AVI as follows: low-risk group (AI ≥1.4, AVI ≥0.62 [2/99, 2.0%]), intermediate low-risk group (AI ≥1.4, AVI <0.62 [2/29, 6.9%]), intermediate high-risk group (AI <1.4, AVI ≥0.62 [8/53, 15.1%]), and high-risk group (AI <1.4, AVI <0.62 [11/21, 52.4%]). Conclusion: The combination of AI and AVI strongly predicted AL. Additionally, the use of AI and AVI enabled the stratification of the risk of AL in patients who underwent esophagectomy with retrosternal reconstruction.

Quantitative assessment of gastric ischemic preconditioning on conduit perfusion in esophagectomy: propensity score weighting study.

BACKGROUND: Gastric ischemic preconditioning prior to esophagectomy has been studied as a method to improve gastric conduit perfusion and reduce anastomotic complications, without conclusive results. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of gastric ischemic preconditioning in terms of post-operative outcomes and quantitative gastric conduit perfusion. METHODS: Patients who underwent an esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction between January 2015 and October 2022 at a single high-volume academic center were reviewed. Patient characteristics, surgical approach, post-operative outcomes, and indocyanine green fluorescence angiography data (ingress index for arterial inflow and ingress time for venous outflow, and the distance from the last gastroepiploic branch to the perfusion assessment point) were analyzed. Two propensity score weighting methods were used to investigate whether gastric ischemic preconditioning reduces anastomotic leaks. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the conduit perfusion quantitatively. RESULTS: There were 594 esophagectomies with gastric conduit performed, with 41 having a gastric ischemic preconditioning. Among 544 with cervical anastomoses, leaks were seen in 2/30 (6.7%) in the ischemic preconditioning group and 114/514 (22.2%) in the control group (p = 0.041). Gastric ischemic preconditioning significantly reduced anastomotic leaks on both weighting methods (p = 0.037 and 0.047, respectively). Ingress index and time of the gastric conduit with ischemic preconditioning were significantly better than those without preconditioning (p = 0.013 and 0.025, respectively) after removing the effect of the distance from the last gastroepiploic branch to the perfusion assessment point. CONCLUSION: Gastric ischemic preconditioning results in a statistically significant improvement in conduit perfusion and reduction in post-operative anastomotic leaks.

Postoperative inflammatory markers predict survival in patients after McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are correlated with a poor prognosis of various cancers. The significance of postoperative systemic inflammation markers for prognostic stratification of patients with esophageal cancer (EC) has not been established. Therefore, this study aimed to elucidate the impact of postoperative CAR and NLR on survival in patients with EC for prognostic stratification. METHODS: A total of 235 patients who received curative esophagectomy were analyzed. A Cox proportional hazard model was performed to detect prognostic factors. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative CAR ≥ 0.05 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-2.57) and NLR ≥ 3.0 (HR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.79-4.40) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Meanwhile, postoperative CAR ≥ 0.05 (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.07-2.41) and NLR ≥ 3.0 (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.29-2.85) were also significant prognostic factors for relapse-free survival. In addition, the patient group with postoperative CAR ≥ 0.05 and NLR ≥ 3.0 had the worst survival. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative CAR ≥ 0.05 and NLR ≥ 3.0 can predict the poor survival of patients who received curative esophagectomy for EC.

Microscopic venous invasion is a predictor of prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing ineffective neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery is Japan's most effective treatment modality for advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, the prognosis is not as expected. This study aimed to examine prognostic factors in patients with pathologically ineffective neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between December 2008 and July 2021. The patients were divided into the neoadjuvant chemotherapy effective group and the neoadjuvant chemotherapy ineffective group according to the pathological diagnosis. Clinicopathological data, prognosis, and recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients (121 males, 22 females; median age, 67 years) were included in this study. Of these, 34 patients were classified into the effective group and the remaining 109 patients were assigned to the ineffective group. The ineffective group had significantly worse overall survival and recurrence-free survival than the effective group (p = 0.0192 and p = 0.0070, respectively). In the ineffective group, multivariate analysis demonstrated that microscopic venous invasion was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio 2.44; 95% confidence interval 1.13-5.30) and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 2.43; 95% confidence interval 1.24-4.73). CONCLUSIONS: Microscopic venous invasion was associated with poor survival and cancer recurrence in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy ineffective group of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

A Novel Frailty Grade Combined with Cachexia Index and Osteopenia in Esophagectomy.

BACKGROUNDS: The optimal method for evaluating frailty grade in patients with cancer has not been established in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. This study aimed to clarify the impact of cachexia index (CXI) and osteopenia on survival in esophagectomized patients for esophageal cancer to develop frailty grade for risk stratification of the prognosis. METHODS: A total of 239 patients who underwent esophagectomy were analyzed. CXI was calculated as follows: skeletal muscle index × serum albumin/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Meanwhile, osteopenia was defined as below the cutoff value of bone mineral density (BMD) calculated by the receiver operating characteristic curve. We evaluated the average Hounsfield unit within a circle in the lower midvertebral core of the 11th thoracic vertebra on preoperative computed tomography as BMD. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that low CXI (Hazard ratio [HR], 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-3.04) and osteopenia (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.19-2.93) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Meanwhile, low CXI (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.06-2.34) and osteopenia (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.05-2.36) were also significant prognostic factors for relapse-free survival. A frailty grade combined with CXI and osteopenia stratified into four groups by their prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Low CXI and osteopenia predict poor survival in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Furthermore, a novel frailty grade combined with CXI and osteopenia stratified the patients into four groups according to their prognosis.

Wider Gastric Conduit Morphology Is Associated with Improved Blood Flow During Esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear what is the ideal conduit shape. The aim of this study was to evaluate association between specific gastric conduit morphology, considering width and length, with its perfusion and the incidence of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. METHODS: Patients who underwent an esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis between 2015 and 2021 were evaluated. Indocyanine green angiography was performed to evaluate gastric conduit perfusion, and ingress index (arterial inflow) and ingress time (venous outflow) were measured. The conduit width at the middle of the conduit and the short gastric length as the length from the last gastroepiploic branch to the perfusion assessment point were measured. Propensity score matching was performed to compare wide conduits with narrow conduits. Narrow and wide conduits were defined as < 4 and ≥ 5 cm, respectively. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-eight patients were reviewed. After applying matching, the wide conduits had higher ingress index (48.2 vs 33.3%, p < 0.001) and shorter ingress time (51.2 vs 66.3 s, p = 0.004) compared to the narrow conduits. Including the short gastric length in analysis, creating a wide conduit is a significant factor for better ingress index (p = 0.001), especially when the perfusion assessment point is 5 cm or farther from the last gastroepiploic branch. Anastomotic leaks did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Conduit width is a significant factor of gastric conduit perfusion, especially when the estimated anastomotic site was > 5 cm from the last gastroepiploic branch. Wide conduits seem to have better perfusion and creating a wider conduit might reduce anastomotic leaks.

Additional Microvascular Anastomosis to Gastric Conduit During Esophagectomy Reduces Anastomotic Leaks: Propensity Score Weighting Study.

BACKGROUND: Impaired gastric conduit perfusion during esophagectomy and reconstruction is considered a key risk factor of anastomotic leaks. The aim of this study is to evaluate the indication and feasibility of additional microvascular anastomosis (AMA) to the gastric conduit in esophageal cancer surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who received an esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction between July 2008 and July 2021 at a single center were reviewed. Patient characteristics, anastomotic viability index (AVI) of the gastric conduit measured with thermal imaging, and operative outcomes were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test. Two propensity score weighting methods (inverse probability of treatment weighting and overlap weighting) were applied to investigate whether AMA reduces anastomotic leaks. RESULTS: Of the 293 patients who underwent an esophagectomy over the study period, 26 received AMA. AVI in the AMA group was significantly lower than that in the control group (0.64 vs. 0.74, p = 0.026). Overall anastomotic leak rates were 3.8% in the AMA group and 12.4% in the control group. Using two different propensity score weighting methods, the same conclusion was obtained that AMA significantly reduced anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy (both p < 0.001). The logistic regression model for estimating probability of anastomotic leaks provided AVI criteria for AMA application and revealed that AMA significantly reduced the estimated leak rates by a maximum of 49%. CONCLUSIONS: Additional microvascular anastomosis significantly reduced anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. The proposed AVI criteria for AMA application can help guide surgeons as to when AMA is needed.

Risk Stratification of Postoperative Pneumonia in Patients Undergoing Subtotal Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Despite recent progress in surgical techniques and perioperative management, postesophagectomy pneumonia remains the most common complication. Thus, it is important to identify the risk factors of postoperative pneumonia and to improve perioperative management. This study aimed to clarify risk factors for postoperative pneumonia and subsequently stratify the risk of pneumonia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 154 patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy were divided into two groups: patients without pneumonia and those with pneumonia. Their backgrounds and operative outcomes were compared. Furthermore, risk factors of postoperative pneumonia were evaluated using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Postoperative pneumonia developed in 18.8% (n=29) of the study cohort. In the multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for postoperative pneumonia were forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1) <1.98 l [p=0.011; odds ratio (OR)=3.960; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.380-11.400], thoracotomy (p=0.043; OR=3.110; 95%CI=1.030-9.320), operative blood loss ≥390 ml (p=0.013; OR=3.900; 95%CI=1.340-11.400), and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (RLNP) (p=0.014; OR=3.740; 95%CI=1.310-10.700). Patients were also stratified into the following four groups as per the number of significant risk factors: the incidence of pneumonia in patients with no risk factor, one risk factor, two risk factors, three risk factors were 7.0% (5/71), 13.7% (7/51), 43.5% (10/23), and 77.7% (7/9), respectively. CONCLUSION: FEV1 <1.98 l, thoracotomy, operative blood loss ≥390 ml, and RLNP were independent risk factors of postoperative pneumonia. Additionally, patients could be stratified into four groups according to the incidence of pneumonia.

Risk stratification of anastomotic stricture using early postoperative endoscopic and computed tomography findings in patients undergoing esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer.

Anastomotic stricture (AS) is one of the major complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. We have previously reported that severe mucosal degeneration (MD) of the anastomotic site was associated with the incidence of AS. Meanwhile, there are few reports to correlate anastomotic internal circumference (AIC) with computed tomography (CT) with the incidence of AS. Therefore, this study was conducted to clarify the correlation of early postoperative endoscopic and CT findings with the incidence of AS. We assessed 205 patients who underwent esophagectomy. We then divided them into the non-AS group (n = 164) and the AS group (n = 41) and compared their background data and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. We also evaluated the risk factors for AS using logistic regression model. Multivariate analysis revealed small AIC (P = 0.003; OR = 4.400; 95% CI = 1.650-11.700) and severe MD (P < 0.001; OR = 7.200; 95% CI = 2.650-19.600) as the independent risk factors for AS development. We also stratified the patients into the following four groups according to the incidence of AS: low-risk (normal AIC and intact or mild MD, 6.2%), intermediate-risk (small AIC and intact or mild MD, 29.4%), high-risk (normal AIC and severe MD, 42.9%), and very high-risk (small AIC and severe MD, 61.1%). Early postoperative endoscopic and CT findings were useful in predicting the development of AS after esophagectomy.

Effect of the postural transition in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: The advantages of prone position in minimally invasive esophagectomy have not been well studied. This study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of a transition from the left lateral decubitus position to the prone position for thoracic procedures in minimally invasive esophagectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with thoracic esophageal carcinomas who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy and laparoscopic gastric mobilization between January 2015 and December 2019. The left decubitus and prone positions were analyzed using propensity score-matched pairs for the baseline characteristics, morbidity, and survival. RESULTS: A total of 114 consecutive patients were included in this study; 90 (78.9%) were male and the median age was 67.2 years old. Of these patients, 39 and 75 underwent left decubitus and prone esophagectomy, respectively. Prone esophagectomy was associated with a lower incidence of pneumonia than that performed in the decubitus position (12.5% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.0187). With respect to the long-term outcomes, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. The 4-year overall and relapse-free survival rates for prone and decubitus esophagectomy were 73.8% and 73.2%, and 84.4% and 71.8%, respectively (p = 0.9899 and 0.6751, respectively). Prone esophagectomy yielded a shorter operative time (total: 528 [485-579] min vs. 581 [555-610] min, p < 0.0022; thoracic section: 243 [229-271] min vs. 292 [274-309] min, p < 0.0001), less bleeding in the thoracic procedures (0 [0-10] mL vs. 70 [20-138] mL, p < 0.0001), a shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (19 [15-23] vs. 30 [21-46] days, p = 0.0002), and a lower total hospital charge (30,046 [28,175-32,660] US dollars vs. 36,396 [31,533-41,180] US dollars, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Transition into the prone position in minimally invasive esophagectomy is feasible with adequate postoperative and oncological safety and economical in esophageal cancer surgery.

Intraoperative nerve monitoring during esophagectomy reduces the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy.

BACKGROUND: Despite the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy during esophagectomy, no established method of monitoring RLN injury is currently available. METHODS: This study included 187 patients who underwent esophagectomy between 2011 and 2018. Among these, intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) was done in 142 patients (IONM group), while the remaining 45 patients underwent conventional surgery without IONM (control group). We investigated the incidence of postoperative complications with regard to the use of IONM. RESULTS: The overall incidence of postoperative RLN palsy was 28% (52/187). The IONM group showed a significantly lower incidence of postoperative RLN palsy as compared to that in the control group (p = 0.004). The overall incidence of postoperative pneumonia was 22% (41/187) in those with Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification beyond grade 2. There were no significant differences between the incidence of any grade of postoperative pneumonia and the use of IONM (p = 0.195 and 0.333; CD > 2 and > 3, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumors in the upper third [odds ratio (OR) 3.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-9.29] and lack of IONM use (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.17-5.38) were independent factors causing postoperative RLN palsy after esophagectomy. CONCLUSION: IONM helps to reduce the risk of postoperative RLN palsy after esophageal cancer surgery.

Quantitative perfusion assessment of gastric conduit with indocyanine green dye to predict anastomotic leak after esophagectomy.

Impaired gastric conduit perfusion is a risk factor for anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of intraoperative quantitative assessment of gastric conduit perfusion with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography as a predictor for cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography using the SPY Elite system was performed in patients undergoing a transhiatal or McKeown esophagectomy from July 2015 through December 2020. Ingress (dye uptake) and Egress (dye exit) at two anatomic landmarks (the tip of a conduit and 5 cm from the tip) were assessed. The collected data in the leak group and no leak group were compared by univariate and multivariable analyses. Of 304 patients who were evaluated, 70 patients developed anastomotic leak (23.0%). There was no significant difference in patients' demographic between the groups. Ingress Index, which represents a proportion of blood inflow, at both the tip and 5 cm of the conduit was significantly lower in the leak group (17.9 vs. 25.4% [P = 0.011] and 35.9 vs. 44.6% [P = 0.019], respectively). Ingress Time, which represents an estimated time of blood inflow, at 5 cm of the conduit was significantly higher in the leak group (69.9 vs. 57.1 seconds, P = 0.006). Multivariable analysis suggested that these three variables can be used to predict future leak. Variables of gastric conduit perfusion correlated with the incidence of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak. Intraoperative measurement of gastric conduit perfusion can be predictive for anastomotic leak following esophagectomy.

COVID-19 and migration: A research note on the effects of COVID-19 on internal migration rates and patterns in Japan.

Data on interprefectural migration in Japan are used to discover if the pandemic coincides with any significant shifts in the levels of migration and/or the patterns of movement.

Assessment of button-type jejunostomy for nutritional management after esophagectomy in 201 cases.

BACKGROUND: Many surgeons preferably place a trans-nasal feeding tube or a feeding enterostomy for post-operative nutritional management after esophagectomy. Various types of tubes (such as nasogastric, transgastric, transduodenal, or transjejunal tubes) have been used for enteral feeding; however, the appropriate enteral feeding routes have not yet been proposed. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of button-type jejunostomy. METHODS: We reviewed 201 patients who underwent esophagectomy with placement of a button-type jejunostomy at the Jikei University Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) between 2008 and 2019. The analyzed variables included clinicopathological characteristics, operative data, jejunostomy-related characteristics, and postoperative complications. Postoperative bodyweight loss was examined 6 months and 1 year after the operation. RESULTS: Refractory enterocutaneous fistula and bowel obstruction occurred in 13 (6.5%) and 14 (7.0%) patients, respectively. The body mass index at button-type jejunostomy removal was significantly lower and the duration of button-type jejunostomy placement was significantly longer in patients with a refractory enterocutaneous fistula (p = 0.023 and p < 0.001, respectively). Bowel obstruction was significantly more likely to develop in patients with a non-squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.021) and in patients who underwent open abdominal procedures (p < 0.001). After 1 year, the median bodyweight losses were 12.1% and 15.6% in patients with short and long jejunostomy placement durations (p = 0.642), respectively. CONCLUSION: A button-type jejunostomy is durable and allows easy self-management for maintaining the bodyweight without any adverse events. However, it is strongly recommended that the button be removed within a year to prevent refractory enterocutaneous fistula formation.