Changes in olfactory identification function in total laryngectomy patients - A retrospective study focusing on nasal airflow-inducing maneuver usage, Open Essence misreactions, and odor cluster.

PURPOSE: We aimed to examine how the olfactory identification function of laryngectomy patients is altered by nasal airflow-inducing maneuver (NAIM), a method of olfactory rehabilitation, by analyzing incorrect and correct responses to olfactory identification tests to achieve odor classification. METHODS: Olfactory identification test (Open Essence [OE]) was administered to 46 patients who had undergone a total laryngectomy [Start group (NAIM was initiated from this study) = 17; (already) Using group = 19; and Nonuse group = 10]. The tests were immediately performed after the NAIM and after a mean duration of 8 months. RESULTS: In the Start group, changes in OE correct and incorrect responses showed a significant increase and decrease in the number of correct (p < 0.01) and "detectable but not recognizable" responses (p < 0.05), respectively. In the Using group, errors related to "same cluster" and "detectable but not recognizable" increased and decreased significantly (p < 0.05), respectively. The Nonuse group showed a trend of demonstrating a relatively lower number of correct responses (p < 0.1). Results of odor classification showed that only "putrefaction and sulfur" did not have any significant positive responses in the Start group. DISCUSSION: Evidently, the possibility of capturing changes in olfactory identification function by performing a false response analysis was observed, even if recovery appears to have stalled after long-term use of NAIM. Furthermore, including the "putrefaction and sulfur" cluster in the olfactory rehabilitation of laryngectomy patients and teaching them to consciously sniff "putrefaction and sulfur" in their daily lives is necessary.

A Questionnaire to Assess Phonation and Problems in Daily Living for Provox® Voice Prosthesis Users in Japan.

The aim of this study was to investigate the problems in daily life of Provox® users in Japan with the use of a questionnaire survey and to consider future guidance methods for these patients. We mailed questionnaires to 190 members of a Japanese laryngectomized patient group. We received 118 questionnaires with valid responses. The total voice handicap index (VHI) score was 44.1. Patients were allocated to two groups based on the type of surgery they underwent-laryngectomy or jejunum reconstruction. The VHI score was significantly lower in the simple laryngectomy group than that in the free jejunum reconstruction group (p < 0.01). Only 55.9% of the patients reported having received voice rehabilitation therapy. For other problems of daily life, many patients answered "bad/very bad" for the "smelling," "eating/drinking hot foodstuffs," "blowing nose," and "quantity of sputum" categories. Based on our results, there is a requirement for an effective rehabilitation therapy and appropriate guidance for patients with the Provox® voice prosthesis.

Effects of Nasal Airflow-Inducing Maneuver in Total Laryngectomy Patients Based on Changes to Olfactory Test Results: A Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to retrospectively examine temporal changes in three aspects, i.e., olfactory threshold test, olfactory identification test, and olfactory perception on daily living test, caused by the use of the nasal airflow-inducing maneuver (NAIM). METHODS: The olfactory threshold test (Sniffin' Sticks test), olfactory identification test (Open Essence [OE]), and olfactory perception on daily living test (self-administered odor question; SAOQ) were administered to 46 patients who had undergone a total laryngectomy (NAIM Start group: 17; Using group: 19; and Nonuse group: 10). The tests were immediately performed after the NAIM and again after an average of 8 months. RESULTS: In the NAIM Start group, all olfactory functions significantly improved in the second test compared with the first test (Sniffin' Sticks test and OE, p < 0.01 for both; self-administered, p < 0.05). Additionally, in terms of the intergroup changes among scores for the Sniffin' Sticks test and OE, the NAIM Start group showed a significant difference compared with all of the other groups (Start group > Using and Nonuse group, p < 0.01). The NAIM Using group did not exhibit any significant changes. In the NAIM Nonuse group, olfactory identification function was lower in the second test compared with the first test and showed a trend toward a significant difference (OE, p < 0.1). Temporal changes in SAOQ showed a significant increase in all intragroup comparisons. However, there were no significant differences observed in terms of the changes between the groups. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that even in those who were not using NAIM and undergoing olfactory rehabilitation after laryngectomy (NAIM Start group), the subsequent daily use of NAIM and voluntary rehabilitation aided in the recovery of olfactory function to the same level as that in the already using NAIM group. SAOQ results were considered because of the experimenter effect and they appeared to be unrelated to use NAIM. This study showed that in total laryngectomy patients who did not receive olfactory rehabilitation, olfactory identification was reduced.

Efficacy of Nasal Airflow-Inducing Maneuver in Laryngectomy Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the nasal airflow-inducing maneuver (NAIM) using the Sniffin' Sticks (Burghart, Wedel, Germany) olfactory threshold test, Open Essence (OE, FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan) olfactory identification test, and self-administered odor questionnaire (SAOQ) for olfactory perception in NAIM experienced and NAIM first-time groups. For NAIM first-time group, the relationships between time from laryngectomy to first NAIM, olfactory threshold, and identification ability were also evaluated. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Sixty-six patients who had undergone laryngectomy (NAIM experienced group: 23; NAIM first-time group: 43) underwent the threshold test, OE, and SAOQ. RESULTS: Mean results of the threshold test were 2.7 (±2.3) and 2.5 (±3.0) for the NAIM experienced and NAIM first-time groups, respectively, indicating no significant differences (P = .35). The mean number of correct responses in OE was 4.5 (±2.7) and 3.2 (±3.0) in the NAIM experienced and nonrehabilitation groups, respectively, indicating a higher number in the NAIM experienced group (P = .06). Mean result of SAOQ was 47.9% (±30.9%) and 25.5% (±27.0%) in the NAIM experienced and NAIM first-time groups, respectively, indicating a significantly higher result in the NAME experienced group (P = .003). There were no correlations of threshold test and identification test scores with time from laryngectomy to the first NAIM (threshold test: r = 0.03, P = .87; OE: r = -0.03, P = .87). CONCLUSION: NAIM enabled odor perception in patients who underwent laryngectomy, and SAOQ was an effective method for evaluating this. Further, olfactory tests in both groups showed that NAIM might restore olfaction irrespective of time elapsed since laryngectomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 130: 2013-2018, 2020.

A questionnaire to assess olfactory rehabilitation for laryngectomized patients (Provox voice prosthesis users) in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: We used a questionnaire to investigate olfactory function and the present state of olfactory rehabilitation for laryngectomized patients in Japan. METHODS: This study was conducted using a questionnaire survey. We mailed questionnaires to 190 members of a Japanese laryngectomized patient group (the nonprofit organization YOUSAY-KAI). The survey queried the following items: (1) basic information (age, sex, alaryngeal speech method, etc.); (2) questions about olfactory rehabilitation, such as the individual's experience of olfactory rehabilitation, the number of days from laryngectomy to the start of olfactory rehabilitation, and the location of rehabilitation (i.e., hospital or patient association); (3) free comments; and (4) the self-administered Odor Questionnaire (SAOQ). RESULTS: We received 121/190 questionnaires by the submission deadline. Of these, 105 questionnaires were valid. All 105 responders used the Provox voice prosthesis as the alaryngeal speech method. Only 4.7% (5/105) of the patients received olfactory rehabilitation in hospitals. Many comments in the free comment column included demands for olfactory rehabilitation such as "I want to know where we can have olfactory rehabilitation" and "I want to have rehabilitation if olfaction recovers." The SAOQ score was significantly higher in the rehabilitation group (mean, 42.5%) compared to the nonrehabilitation group (mean, 22.1%) (p<0.05). There was no correlation between the SAOQ score and the number of days from laryngectomy to the start of rehabilitation (r=0.08, p=0.76)． CONCLUSION: Patient demand for olfactory rehabilitation is strong, but this therapy is not widely offered to laryngectomized patients in Japan. Notably, the SAOQ scores showed that olfactory rehabilitation may have an effect, even if it is initiated after laryngectomy. We believe that when patients choose voice prosthesis for speech, their olfaction deteriorates unless they undergo olfactory rehabilitation separately from speech rehabilitation. It is therefore necessary to administer olfactory rehabilitation for laryngectomized patients who have never received olfactory rehabilitation, as well as for patients scheduled to undergo laryngectomy.

[A 53-year-old man with herpes encephalitis showing acceleration of improvement in higher brain function after general anesthesia with sevoflurane: a case report].

We experienced a right-handed 53-year-old man who presented with disturbance of consciousness and fever. Herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE) was diagnosed based on the detection of herpes simplex virus DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid. The administration of acyclovir for 42 days improved his consciousness level. Drowsiness, fever and seizures reappeared 20 days after stopping acyclovir treatment (day 67) and he responded well to vidarabine and methylprednisolone pulse therapy. An assessment of aphasia on day 98 revealed transcortical sensory aphasia. Brain MRI showed lesion in the left temporal lobe, bilateral insular cortexes and bilateral frontal lobe. His higher brain dysfunction continued. On day 156, he underwent hip replacement arthroplasty under general anesthesia sevoflurane. His higher brain dysfunction rapidly improved thereafter. We concluded that the accelerated improvement in our patient's higher brain function was related to the protective effect of sevoflurane. Some reports also show the protective effects of sevoflurane in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by inhibition of T cell activation. These protective and anti-inflammatory effects may explain the accelerated improvement in higher brain function after general anesthesia.