RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Because molecular-targeted drugs against MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping have been approved, molecular testing of the alteration has added to clinical guidelines. There are several such assays, but methodological issues have been reported. METHODS: METex14 skipping results from three assays (Oncomine DxTT, ArcherMET, and laboratory-developed reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction test [LDT RT-PCR]) were compared in a relatively small series of the specimens diagnosed as advanced NSCLC (n = 50). RESULTS: The ArcherMET and LDT RT-PCR results were identical for all 50 samples, but eight samples had discordant results between Oncomine DxTT and the other two assays. All eight samples had METex14 skipping with Oncomine DxTT and wild-type signals with ArcherMET and LDT RT-PCR. The discordance might be caused by the homopolymeric error of the splice donor site with Oncomine DxTT, and false positives could be distinguished by relatively low read counts. CONCLUSIONS: Although the caution in detecting METex14 skipping focuses on false negatives in the literature, false positives were first noted at a relatively high frequency (8 of 26, 30.8%) in this study. According to the results of previous clinical trials using the other tyrosine kinase inhibitors, it could be surmised that MET inhibitor treatment in patients without METex14 skipping is detrimental. Clinicians need to be alert to the false positives that can lead to harmful treatments.
