Rectal injury caused by a personal watercraft accident: report of a case.

PURPOSE: An original case of rectal injury after a personal watercraft accident is reported. Principles of rectal trauma management are discussed. METHODS: We present a case of a rectal injury after a fall from a personal watercraft. Rigid sigmoidoscopy and a water-soluble contrast enema documented a posterior rectal tear. The patient was managed by diversion, drainage, and administration of antibiotics. RESULTS: The patient's rectal tear healed without complication. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of an injury to the rectum as a result of a personal watercraft accident. A high suspicion of rectal injury must be maintained in victims who have fallen from the back of a personal watercraft. Treatment of a rectal injury should follow the basic principles of drainage, diversion, and administration of antibiotics, but variations in traditional management may be appropriate. Finally, preventative methods including wearing protective clothing, and possible modification to the watercraft to reduce risk of injury should be considered.

Approach to the patient.

A systematic approach to the patient with anorectal complaints allows for an accurate and efficient diagnosis of the underlying problem. The process can be divided into the interview, the examination, treatment, and conveyance of information. Throughout this process, the patient must be reassured and made as comfortable as possible. A successful interaction with the patient leads to a diagnosis and a treatment plan that is acceptable to both the physician and the patient.

The single-stapled ileo pouch anal anastomosis: a reasonable compromise.

Minimal anal sphincter disruption and preservation of the transitional epithelium during ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) are believed to play important roles in improving functional outcome. As a result, many surgeons have abandoned the traditional mucosectomy in favor of a double-stapled technique. The natural history of the retained colonic epithelium that occurs with this approach is uncertain. The authors have employed a technique of single circular-stapled IPAA, which accomplishes both of the described goals, while insuring that all the colonic mucus is removed during mucosectomy. We present a series of patients (n = 39) undergoing IPAA with transanal mucosectomy and a circular stapled anastomosis. The series consists of 16 males and 23 females with a mean age of 33.4 +/- 1.7 years. Twenty-nine patients had temporary ileostomies (2 not closed yet), and 10 did not. Pelvic sepsis occurred in two patients. However, three (9%) patients developed anastomotic sinus tracts that delayed ileostomy closure. With a follow-up of 24.0 +/- 3.2 months, the mean number of bowel movements are: day 6.4 +/- 0.4; night 1.1 +/- 0.2. Continence has been good or excellent in 97 per cent of patients during the day and 86 per cent at night. Therefore, this series indicates that good to excellent functional results following IPAA in the vast majority of patients can be accomplished with a transanal mucosectomy and a single stapled IPAA anastomotic technique. These results are comparable with those obtained with the double stapling technique without risk of retained rectal mucosa. Therefore, this technique provides good functional results because of minimal anal sphincter stretching, while at the same time insuring removal of all abnormal colonic epithelium.

Treatment of levator syndrome using high-voltage electrogalvanic stimulation.

Twenty patients diagnosed as having levator syndrome were treated with electrogalvanic stimulation (EGS). Many of these patients had previously been treated unsuccessfully with other methods. While 60 percent of patients had good or excellent response to EGS when assessed immediately after therapy, a subsequent telephone survey revealed that one third of this group experienced recurrence. Of the group of 20 patients, only five (25 percent) remained symptom-free. Though results in this study were less favorable than other reports, EGS may still serve as a valuable adjunct in the treatment of levator syndrome.

The role of preoperative colonoscopy in colorectal cancer.

Routine preoperative colonoscopy has been recommended for those patients with the diagnosis of colorectal cancer to identify synchronous polyps and/or cancers which might otherwise be undetected on barium enema or at the time of operation. It has been suggested that this approach may alter surgical therapy or follow-up. The charts of 98 patients who underwent preoperative colonoscopy solely for the purpose of detecting additional polyps or cancers prior to open surgical resection for colorectal cancer were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had biopsy or barium-enema evidence of colorectal cancer. Patients with familial polyposis or chronic ulcerative colitis were excluded. Synchronous cancers were detected in 7.1 percent of patients, and synchronous neoplastic polyps in 29 percent. Forty-three percent of synchronous cancers and 73 percent of synchronous neoplastic polyps would not have been included in the standard surgical resection for the index cancer if the additional information provided by colonoscopy had not been available. Surgical treatment and/or follow-up were altered in 33 percent of patients as a consequence of the colonoscopic evaluation. Colonoscopy prior to surgery for colorectal carcinoma is highly desirable and may potentially improve long-term survival.