RESUMO
Objective: The primary aim of this study was to develop an Urdu-translated version of the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale and perform a psychometric evaluation of it. A secondary aim was to estimate the prevalence of preoperative anxiety using Urdu-translated Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale in patients undergoing surgery in Karachi, Pakistan, and the factors contributing to anxiety among them. Method: This cross-sectional survey included 267 patients enrolled for elective surgery under general anesthesia from March 5 to November 20, 2022. In psychometric analysis, face validity, criterion validity, construct validity, and reliability of Urdu-translated Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale were determined. Face validity was evaluated by performing blind-back translation and a pilot study. Criterion validity was evaluated by correlating the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale with the visual analog scale for anxiety. Exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's α test were used to analyze construct validity and reliability, respectively. The associate variables were identified by performing a one-sample t-test and one-way analysis of variance on SPSS 26. Results: Cronbach's α test is 0.85 for the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale anxiety scale and 0.70 for the need for information. 65.3% of the total variance is explained by the Urdu version of Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale items in factor analysis and the intercorrelation of all items was >0.20 (mean: 0.575). Urdu-translated Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale and visual analog scale for anxiety showed a good correlation (r = 0.664, p < 0.001). The overall prevalence of preoperative anxiety among patients is 52.4% suggested by the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale cutoff score of more than 11. Females, students, and patients elected for major surgery shared significantly higher anxiety levels (p < 0.05). The commonest factors contributing to anxiety are postoperative pain in 140 (52.4%) patients, fear of death in 115 (43.1%), and financial loss in 91 (34.1%). Conclusions: The Urdu-translated Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale is a reliable, valid, and acceptable screening tool for preoperative anxiety. The prevalence of preoperative anxiety was high. The preoperative anxiety level is significantly associated with gender, employment status, and type of surgery.
RESUMO
Carotid stenosis (CS) is a buildup of atherosclerotic plaque within the artery leading to a wide range of symptoms, from mild symptoms, including blurred vision and confusion, to much more life-threatening presentations, including paralysis due to stroke. The presentation is insidious, with symptoms exhibiting predominantly at severe stenosis; hence the emphasis is placed on the importance of early diagnosis, treatment, and lifestyle modifications. CS is seen undergoing almost the same pathogenesis of any atherosclerotic plaque formation, from endothelial damage of the artery lumen to the formation of a fibrous cap with a foam cell, lipid-filled core. The findings of our review article were consistent with the recent literature, depicting that comorbid hypertension, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease (CKD), and lifestyle aspects, including smoking and diet, played the most salient role in plaque development. Among several imaging modalities, duplex ultrasound (DUS) imaging is the widely preferred method in clinical practice. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid stenting are the primarily advocated procedures for symptomatic severe stenosis, with similar long-term outcomes. Although, earlier clinical trials showed promising results in mitigating the risk of stroke among asymptomatic severe CS with surgical intervention. However, recent advancements have shifted the focus to medical management alone due to comparable results among the asymptomatic population. Both surgical and medical regimens are beneficial in treating patients, but it is still an ongoing debate as to which is predominantly superior. The currently advancing trials and research will help elucidate definitive guidelines. However, the massive impact of lifestyle modifications advocates some degree of individualized multidisciplinary management strategies.
