Long-term fluctuations of pressure pain thresholds in healthy men, normally menstruating women and oral contraceptive users.

The aim of this investigation was to evaluate whether the pressure pain threshold (PPT) in masticatory muscles of symptom-free subjects was influenced by fluctuations of the sex hormones. The PPT was measured with an electronic algometer for at least 10 consecutive menstrual cycles in 10 women using oral contraceptives and 10 women not using oral contraceptives, with a regular menstrual cycle (26-31 days). In addition, 10 men were measured in a regular pattern over a period of 1 year. All subjects were symptom-free with an age range between 18 and 39 years. Measurement sessions were held during three different cycle phases (follicular, luteal, perimenstrual) and each session consisted of four consecutive PPT measurements. By means of a linear mixed model (SAS), the PPTs of the masster, temporalis and thumb muscles were compared between: (1) groups, (2) sex-hormonal phases, (3) the four consecutive measurements of each muscle per session and (4) time. The PPTs of the masseter (p = 0.8419) and temporalis muscles (p = 0.2786) did not change significantly over time. There was no significant difference in variance for the masseter (p = 0.6250), temporalis (p = 0.9705) and thumb (p = 0.7446) between the three groups. The PPTs of all muscles were significantly lower during the perimenstrual phases in the two female groups. The present data showed similar patterns of PPTs for the three muscle groups. Moreover, the results have shown a very good consistency of the PPTs over a long time period, both in males and females.

Short-term reproducibility of pressure pain thresholds in masticatory muscles measured with a new algometer.

The purpose of this project was to test the within-day and between-days reproducibility of a new and inexpensive algometer. Twelve symptom-free men and nine women participated. Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) of the bilateral masseter and temporalis muscles were assessed during four sessions (mornings and afternoons of days 1 and 3). During each session, each palpation point of the masticatory muscles was measured four times. There was an interval of only a few seconds between measurements 1 and 2, and between measurements 3 and 4, respectively, while at least 5 minutes of rest were allowed between measurements 2 and 3. The PPT values between the morning and afternoon sessions and between days 1 and 3 were not significantly different. When the within-session reproducibility for all muscles was considered, only the PPT values between measurements 2 and 4 were not significantly different. Analysis of variance showed that the interindividual variability of PPT was 1.4 to 6.8 times higher than the variability observed within or between sessions and days. No gender difference was found.

Short-term reproducibility of pressure pain thresholds in masseter and temporalis muscles of symptom-free subjects.

Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) of the bilateral masseter and temporalis muscles were assessed over a single day and in between 2 days with the aid of an electronic algometer in 11 males and 11 females. Using a mixed model approach, covariance results were controlled for confounding of gender, day, time of the day and the within-session replications of the measurements. For every jaw muscle, the first PPT measurement of a session was markedly higher than the last one of that same session. Except for the right temporalis muscles, no significant systematic PPT differences could be observed between male and female subjects. The differences between morning and afternoon sessions were not significant for any of the muscles tested. Although the PPTs measured on the 1st day were systematically lower than those on the 2nd day for the left masseter and temporalis muscles, no significant difference between the time of the day could be observed when the values of the different muscles were grouped within a subject. Analysis of variance showed that the variability induced by the day or the time of the day was similar to the variability of the measurement itself. The inter-individual variability of PPTs was 2.3 to 9 x higher than the variability observed between trials, sessions or days. The results indicate that the PPT measurement will not be systematically influenced by the time of registration (morning/afternoon) or inbetween consecutive days. In addition, the important inter-individual differences favor the use of longitudinal within-subject studies.