RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Successful translation of evidence-based exercise training interventions from research to clinical practice depends on the balance of treatment fidelity and adaptability when delivering the exercise program across settings. The current paper summarizes fidelity of study design, provider training, and intervention delivery strategies from best practice recommendations, and reports challenges experienced and adaptations instrumented by behavioral coaches delivering the multi-site Supervised versus Telerehabilitation Exercise Programs for Multiple Sclerosis (STEP for MS) Trial. METHODS: Using a reflexive thematic analysis approach, open-ended survey questions were analyzed to explore experiences of behavioral coaches, transcripts from team meetings among behavioral coaches, and notes from audits of one-on-one sessions between behavioral coaches and participants. RESULTS: Themes related to the fidelity of study design and delivery of the STEP for MS Trial included adaptations to the intervention itself (e.g., completion of virtual supervised exercise sessions with behavioral coaches in place of face-to-face sessions during COVID-19 pandemic restrictions), modification of exercise equipment, and adjustments of program delivery. The adjustments of program delivery reported by behavioral coaches included increasing program fit, maintaining engagement, and addressing participant safety concerns; however, these adaptations did not jeopardize the content of the essential elements of the program model. CONCLUSIONS: The current paper demonstrates that when best practice recommendations are implemented, it is possible to address challenges to study design and evidence-based intervention delivery in ways that adaptations to overcome real-world obstacles can be accomplished without compromising fidelity.
