The relationship between kinaesthesia, motor performance, physical fitness and joint mobility in children living in Nigeria.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the relationship between kinaesthesia, motor performance, fitness, and joint mobility in children. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted involving children from two primary schools in the South-Eastern part of Nigeria. The Beighton criteria were used to measure joint mobility. Motor performance, fitness, and kinaesthesia were measured in all the children. Spearman's rank correlation was used to evaluate the relationship between the outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 91 children (51.6% girls) participated in the study. The mean age of the children was 8.20 ± 1.98 years. Using a Beighton score of ≥ 6, Generalized Joint Hypermobility (GJH) was identified in a total of 35 (38.46%) children and was more prevalent in females (60.0%). Joint mobility had significant correlations with most fitness and motor performance items, but not kinaesthesia. Agility & power, and motor performance seem to be reduced if mobility is larger. Kinaesthesia was correlated with most fitness and motor performance items, indicating that better fitness and better motor performance cooccur with better kinaesthesia or vice versa. CONCLUSION: Joint mobility may have a significant influence on fitness and motor performance in children. Hence, it may be useful for future studies to investigate how fitness and motor performance modulate the onset and progression of musculoskeletal symptoms in GJH.

Prevalence and Demographic Distribution of Hypermobility in a Random Group of School-Aged Children in Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of hypermobility in randomly selected healthy children, without previous trauma or disease process affecting the joints and whether other demographic variables (age, sex, BMI) had an impact on Beighton scores and range of motion (RoM) in children between 6 and 10 years of age. RESULTS: 286 children were included; 27.3% of them had a Beighton score ≥7/9 and 72% would be classified hypermobile if we had used a Beighton cut-off score ≥4/9. Prevalence declined with increasing age. Girls were more often hypermobile (34%) than boys (20%) and this was mainly caused by increased RoM in the knees. Positive scores of finger items of the Beighton were more common than on the other items, leading to a high prevalence of peripheral hypermobility. Localized hypermobility was only found in the fifth MCP joint. A total of 15% of the children with normal mobility reached 20 excess degrees RoM of the left and right fifth MCP. Pain was present in 12 of the 239 children but was not linked to the level of mobility. CONCLUSION: Hypermobility is the rule in this pain-free population of children with GJH.

Judging heel height: A new test for proprioception while standing reveals that young hypermobile children perform better than controls.

BACKGROUND: Children with Generalized Joint Hypermobility (GJH) have been reported to have poorer proprioception than children with normal mobility. However, they were usually tested under unloaded conditions and in an age-group in which pain starts to play a role. RESEARCH QUESTION: In contrast, some young children with GJH perform well in motor tasks, suggesting they may have good proprioceptive abilities if assessed more ecologically. METHODS: Children with GJH (Beighton score of  ≥ 5; mean age 8.34 years) were compared to children with a Beighton score of 4 or less. A proprioception test was performed using wedges of different heights to evaluate the ability to judge heel height. A pair of wedges of various heights, was placed under the children's feet at random and they were required to report the higher leg while standing RESULTS: Independent t-test showed that children with GJH performed better (p < 0.01) than controls, suggesting better proprioceptive abilities when assessed under loaded conditions SIGNIFICANCE: Children with GJH do not have inferior proprioception when tested under loaded conditions. The least one can say is that one should be careful in postulating that measuring passive position sense in one particular joint is necessarily the best estimation of proprioception. Body position during standing can be estimated on the basis of knowledge of joint positions (of the ankle in particular in the present test) but also of other information (loading of foot mechanoreceptors for example). In conclusion, the new test may be more suited to evaluate proprioception than the conventional tests, which rely on passive joint position estimation during sitting.