Sirolimus for rescue and primary immunosuppression in transplanted children receiving tacrolimus.

AIMS: The role of sirolimus (SRL) as a rescue agent (n=42) and as a component of primary immunosuppression (n=8) was evaluated in a mixed population of 50 transplanted children receiving tacrolimus (liver: 26, heart: 5, intestinal: 5, liver-intestine: 9, lung: 1, bone marrow: 1, liver-kidney: 1, multivisceral: 1). Rescue indications for tacrolimus (TAC) failure were recurrent acute rejection and acute rejection complicating withdrawal of immunosuppression in posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Rescue indications for TAC toxicity were nephrotoxicity, pancreatitis, seizures, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and graft-versus-host disease. RESULTS: Mean age at rescue was 11.5 years and mean follow-up was 204 (range 18-800) days. As primary immunosuppression, SRL+TAC prevented early acute rejection in 7/8 children. The indication for rescue resolved in 33/42 children. In children with TAC toxicity, this was associated with decrease in TAC doses by 50%, significant improvements in renal function, and continuing decline in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viral load in PTLD patients. Serious adverse events led to discontinuation of SRL in 9/42 rescue patients, 3 of them also experienced acute rejection. Three additional children also experienced acute rejection on SRL therapy (overall incidence 6/50, 12%). Pharmacokinetic analysis in the first week of SRL administration suggested a short half-life (11.8+/-5.5 hr, n=21). CONCLUSIONS: SRL and reduced-dose TAC may achieve adequate immunosuppression without compromising renal function or enhancing EBV viremia significantly.

Reasons why some children receiving tacrolimus therapy require steroids more than 5 years post liver transplantation.

Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive agent and has been used in liver transplantation (LTx) for nearly a decade. More than 70% of children can be maintained on tacrolimus monotherapy, without steroids, by the end of 1 yr post-Tx. This freedom from steroids does not appear to change significantly in subsequent years. The use of steroids has obvious metabolic and cosmetic disadvantages, besides affecting linear growth in children. The present study identifies why some children still require steroid therapy after successful LTx. One hundred and sixty-six consecutive pediatric patients who had undergone primary LTx between October 1989 and December 1992, were included in this study. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 9 yr (mean 7.5 +/- 0.8 yr). One hundred and forty-one children were alive in November 1998 and these patients constituted the study group. Their current rate of prednisone use, reason for prednisone use, and prednisone dose were examined retrospectively. Of the 141 patients, 139 (98.5%) had stopped taking steroids at some time-point after LTx. Thirteen patients (9%) were off immunosuppression altogether (group I), 97 were undergoing tacrolimus monotherapy (group II), and the remaining 31 were receiving therapy with steroids and tacrolimus (group III). The mean prednisone dose at the last follow-up was 6.5 +/- 4.9 mg/day (median 5.0 mg/day). In group III, two children were never weaned off steroids because of inadequate follow-up (both lived outside the country), and the remaining 29 children completely stopped steroid therapy at some time-point after LTx; however, prednisone was re-introduced for clinically suspected or biopsy-proven rejection in 24. Seven children in group III had completely stopped immunosuppressive therapy either as part of an immunosuppression reduction protocol (n = 3) or for suspected or proven post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) (n = 4). In eleven of the 18 children in group III, requirement of steroid for rejection was thought to be related, in part, to non-compliance. In three children in group III, steroids were re-introduced for renal dysfunction, and two of these patients subsequently received a kidney Tx. In one child with cerebral ischemia, steroids were used to reduce brain edema, and another child had features of auto-immune hepatitis. Hence, almost all children can be weaned off steroids when tacrolimus is used as primary immunosuppression after primary LTx. However, approximately 22% of children may need re-institution of steroids because of late acute rejection or renal dysfunction. The concomitant use of other non-steroidal immunosuppressive agents with tacrolimus may further reduce the dose and rate of steroid use.

Long-term results after conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplantation for acute and chronic rejection.

UNLABELLED: Tacrolimus is beneficial in liver transplantation for reversing steroid-resistant acute rejection, and for controlling the process of chronic rejection in allograft recipients receiving Cyclosporine- (CyA) based regimens. Very little is known about the long-term efficacy of tacrolimus in pediatric transplantation after conversion from CyA. Our study examines the long-term outcome after conversion to tacrolimus for acute or chronic rejection in pediatric liver transplant (LTx) recipients. METHOD: Seventy-three children (age < 18 years) receiving their primary LTx under CyA between August 1989 and April 1996 were converted to tacrolimus for ongoing acute rejection (n=22, group I) or chronic rejection (n=51, group II). Mean age at the time of conversion was 10.2+/-5.5 years with a mean interval from LTx to conversion of 3.5+/-2.9 (range 0.5-10.1 years). There were 33 boys and 40 girls. All patients were followed until June 1999. Mean follow-up was 97.3+/-17.4 months (range 62.4-118.9 months). RESULTS: Overall 5-year actual patient survival was 78.1% and 8-year actuarial survival was 74.6%. Patients converted to tacrolimus therapy to resolve acute rejection (group I) experience significantly better patient and graft survival at 5 and 8 years than those converted to resolve chronic rejection (group II). Eight-year patient survival and graft survival was 95.5 and 90.9% for group I compared to 74.6 and 53.5% for group II, respectively (long rank P=0.035 and 0.01, respectively). Nearly 75% of children were weaned off steroids after conversion. There was a marked improvement in hypertension, gum hyperplasia, hirsutism, and cushingoid appearance. One child in group I (4.5%) and four children in group II (7.8%) developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder after conversion. There was an improvement in growth in children who were less than the age of 12 years at the time of conversion and who were weaned off steroids; more significantly girls responded more favorably than boys. CONCLUSION: The benefit of transplantation is maintained long-term after conversion to tacrolimus for acute or chronic rejection. The response rate was significantly better in group I as compared with group 11. Marked improvement in growth, hypertension, and reversal of the brutalizing effects of CyA was noted after conversion to tacrolimus. The results suggest that early conversion of pediatric liver transplant patients is warranted for the treatment of acute and chronic rejection, and for improvements in quality of life.