Diagnostic Value of Perfusion Parameters for Differentiation of Underlying Etiology in Internal Carotid Artery Occlusions.

PURPOSE: Occlusions of the internal carotid artery (ICA) may be caused by dissection, embolic or macroangiopathic pathogenesis, which partially influences the treatment; however, inferring the underlying etiology in computed tomography angiography can be challenging. In this study, we investigated whether computed tomography perfusion (CT-P) parameters could be used to distinguish between etiologies. METHODS: Patients who received CT­P in acute ischemic stroke due to ICA occlusion between 2012 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Group comparisons between etiologies regarding the ratios of CT­P parameters between both hemispheres for relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF), time to maximum (Tmax), and mean transit time (MTT) were calculated by one-factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) and compared by pairwise Bonferroni post hoc tests. An receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed if differences in group comparisons were found. Multinomial logistic regression (MLR) including pretherapeutic parameters was calculated for etiologies. RESULTS: In this study 69 patients (age = 70 ± 14 years, dissection = 10, 14.5%, embolic = 19, 27.5% and macroangiopathic = 40, 58.0%) were included. Group differences in ANOVA were only found for MTT ratio (p = 0.003, η2 = 0.164). In the post hoc test, MTT ratio showed a differentiability between embolic and macroangiopathic occlusions (p = 0.002). ROC analysis for differentiating embolic and macroangiopathic ICA occlusions based on MTT ratio showed an AUC of 0.77 (p < 0.001, CI = 0.65-0.89) and a cut-off was yielded at a value of 1.15 for the MTT ratio (sensitivity 73%, specificity 68%). The MLR showed an overall good model performance. CONCLUSION: It was possible to differentiate between patients with embolic and macroangiopathic ICA occlusions based on MTT ratios and to define a corresponding cut-off. Differentiation from patients with dissection versus the other etiologies was not possible by CT­P parameters in our sample.

Complication Management and Prevention in Vascular and non-vascular Interventions. / Komplikationsmanagement und -vermeidung bei vaskulären und nicht vaskulären Interventionen.

PURPOSE: This overview summarizes key points of complication management in vascular and non-vascular interventions, particularly focusing on complication prevention and practiced safety culture. Flowcharts for intervention planning and implementation are outlined, and recording systems and conferences are explained in the context of failure analysis. In addition, troubleshooting by interventionalists on patient cases is presented. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The patient cases presented are derived from our institute. Literature was researched on PubMed. RESULTS: Checklists, structured intervention planning, standard operating procedures, and opportunities for error and complication discussion are important elements of complication management and essential for a practiced safety culture. CONCLUSION: A systematic troubleshooting and a practiced safety culture contribute significantly to patient safety. Primarily, a rational and thorough error analysis is important for quality improvement. KEY POINTS: · Establishing a safety culture is essential for high-quality interventions with few complications.. · A rational and careful troubleshooting is essential to increase quality of interventions.. · Checklists and SOPs can structure and optimize the procedure of interventions.. CITATION FORMAT: · Weiss D, Wilms LM, Ivan VL et al. Complication Management and Prevention in Vascular and non-vascular Interventions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 1140 - 1146.

Mechanical thrombectomy in acute middle cerebral artery M2 segment occlusion with regard to vessel involvement.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is an established procedure in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to occlusion of the proximal M1-segment of middle cerebral artery. The assessment of distal thrombectomy in daily clinical routine has not yet been sufficiently evaluated. METHODS: Patients with M2-segment-occlusions treated by EVT in the local department (January 2012-December 2017) were included (n = 57, mean National-Institutes-of-Health-Stroke-Scale of 11, range 0-20). Patients were grouped according to localization of M2-occlusion (Cohort A (n = 14): central region only, B (n = 24): central region and involvement of frontal vessels, C (n = 19): parietal, occipital, and/or temporal vessels). Differences in proximal (M2-trunk, n = 34) and distal (M2-branches, n = 23) occlusions were also examined. Reperfusion (Thrombolysis-In-Cerebral-Infarction (TICI)), early clinical outcome at discharge (modified Rankin Scale (mRS)), and complications (hemorrhage, new emboli) were noted. RESULT: Successful reperfusion (TICI2b-3) was found in 49 patients (86.0%). Favorable early clinical outcome (mRS0-2) was achieved in n = 19 (37.7%). Compared to admission, mRS at discharge improved significantly (median (admission) 5 vs. median (discharge) 4, p < 0.001). Early clinical outcome was more favorable in patients with better reperfusion (TICI2b-3: mean mRS 3 ± 1.7 vs. TICI0-2a: mean mRS 4.4 ± 1.4, p = 0.037). Six (10.5%) patients suffered from symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage during treatment or hospitalization. Four patients died (7.0%). No significant differences in favorable clinical outcome (mRS ≤ 2: Cohort A 42.9%, B 50.0%, C 16.7%, p = 0.4; χ2-test) or periinterventional complications were found with regard to vessel involvement. CONCLUSION: EVT in patients with acute M2-occlusion is safe and leads to a significant clinical improvement at discharge. No significant differences in clinical outcome or complications were found with regard to the localization of the M2-occlusion.