RESUMO
Guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) provides more precise information in terms of quantitative measurement and qualitative assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) than does conventional angiography. Several studies have tested the efficacy of IVUS to guide stent implantation. However, the conflicting results have left behind a continued debate as to whether IVUS-guided PCI has an impact on clinical outcome and angiographic restenosis. IVUS and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) share the ability to evaluate the lumen along with the vessel wall, enabling characterisation of proximal and distal reference segments. Nevertheless, IVUS imaging is expensive and usually precluded in severe stenoses. In the present article, we discuss the potential application of CTCA for the guidance of PCI, particularly of complex lesions such as chronic total occlusions (CTO) and bifurcations.
Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Seleção de Pacientes , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de IntervençãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Desirable methods for cardiac CT angiography would both reduce radiation exposure from cardiac CT angiography and preserve accuracy. OBJECTIVES: We assessed image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic accuracy of a low-dose, prospectively gated axial cardiac CT angiography protocol for the evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients referred for diagnostic invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and with a stable heart rate < 60 beats/min after beta-blocker administration were prospectively enrolled in a single center study. Subjects underwent CT angiography with a 64-row multidetector CT scanner with a prospectively gated axial imaging protocol. If the examination was determined to be nondiagnostic, then a retrospectively gated helical scan was performed. Two reviewers independently assessed image quality and the presence of significant coronary artery stenosis (>50%). RESULTS: Prospectively gated CT angiography was successfully performed in 46 of 50 patients. Of 794 coronary segments, 777 were determined to be of diagnostic image quality. The overall patient-based sensitivity (95% CI), specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for the diagnosis of significant coronary stenosis were 100% (87%-100%), 75% (53%-90%), 81% (64%-93%), 100% (81%-100%), and 88% (81%-95%), respectively. The mean effective radiation dose for CT angiography and ICA were 3.4 +/- 0.4 mSv and 6.9 +/- 0.8 mSv, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac CT angiography performed in a prospectively gated axial mode with 64-row multidetector CT provides an accurate, low-dose alternative for the detection of CAD.