Neurogenic Rosacea Treatment: A Literature Review.

Rosacea is a chronic skin disorder involving central facial erythema secondary to vascular instability and cutaneous inflammation. Rosacea is divided into different subtypes based on the morphology of the rash — erythematotelangiectatic, papulopustular, phymatous, and ocular rosacea. A less-known subtype called neurogenic rosacea has been proposed to categorize patients suffering from rosacea with erythematous flushing and burning sensation that is refractory to traditional treatment. There is minimal data on this subgroup of rosacea patients and its potential treatment options. This review aims to explore current medical literature to define characteristics of neurogenic rosacea and its management. We performed a systematic search of PubMed database and identified 6 articles meeting inclusion criteria with a total of 37 patients with suspected neurogenic rosacea. Combination treatments with topicals (eg, metronidazole, brimonidine), as well as oral medications including vascular (eg, beta blockers), psychiatric (eg, diazepam, duloxetine), neurologic (eg, pregabalin, sumatriptan), and antibiotic agents (eg, rifaximin), were often cited to have better outcomes, but this finding was highly variable between patients. There were isolated reports of effective management with onabotulinumtoxinA intradermal injections and endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy treatment. Current literature supports selecting agents aimed at treating the major symptom pattern (eg, erythema, telangiectasias, burning sensation). Neurogenic rosacea treatment: a literature review. Ivanic MG, Oulee A, Norden A, et al. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(6):566-571. doi:10.36849/JDD.7181  .

Platelet-rich plasma as a therapy for androgenic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The past decade has seen platelet-rich plasma (PRP) become a popular therapy around the world as a treatment for androgenetic alopecia (AGA). These systematic review and meta-analyses assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of PRP to determine the role of PRP as a treatment for AGA among the other non-surgical treatment modalities. METHODS: This study follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and is registered under the PROSPERO ID CRD42019136329. Seven databases were searched from inception through May 2019. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed to evaluate the effect of PRP treatments on hair density and hair thickness. RESULTS: Thirty studies, including 687 patients, met our inclusion criteria. Twenty-nine studies reported beneficial results, and 24 studies reached statistical significance on a measured outcome. Ten RCTs were included. Our meta-analyses show that PRP treatment increases hair density and hair thickness. CONCLUSIONS: PRP is an autologous treatment that lacks serious adverse effects and effectively improves hair density and hair thickness in men and women with AGA. Future research should include low risk-of-bias RCTs to optimize treatment protocols, investigate variability among studies, and to obtain more data on hair thickness changes.

Estimating the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection with rituximab use for pemphigus vulgaris.

The occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic has raised new uncertainties for dermatologists and their patients, importantly concerning initiation and continuation of immunosuppressants for dermatological conditions at this time. We review two phase III trials of rituximab, a chimeric CD20 monoclonal antibody, used for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. Without specific data studying rituximab use and susceptibility of SARS-CoV-2, we hope to utilize available data in order to assist clinician decision making for rituximab in the context of the pandemic.

Update on Biologics for Psoriasis in Clinical Practice.

Biologics have impacted the clinical management of moderate to severe psoriasis. This review article highlights new data findings from phase 3 clinical trials (N=8) published between May 2020 and February 2021. Data on the efficacy of US Food and Drug Administration-approved biologics for treating psoriasis affirms durable skin clearance in the presence of comorbidities and after treatment gaps. This article aims to provide clinicians with up-to-date knowledge on biologic performance focusing on skin disease clearance, time to skin disease clearance, loss of response and relapse, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Recent trial data in this review focus on treatment with IL-17A inhibitors and IL-23 inhibitors.

Review of Apremilast Combination Therapies in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition resulting from the dysregulation of cytokines. Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor is approved by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in patients who are eligible for phototherapy or systemic therapy. The drug increases cyclic adenosine monophosphate, cAMP, modulating the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This review aims to explore and categorize current literature describing the efficacy and safety profile of the addition of apremilast to existing therapies including topicals, phototherapy, and systemic agents for the treatment of psoriasis. One database was used for the literature search. Seventeen studies with 617 patients met inclusion criteria and were included. Fifteen studies demonstrated beneficial results with excellent safety and efficacy of apremilast combination therapy (CT). Apremilast has been shown to improve the quality of life and reduce symptom severity in moderate to severe psoriasis. The drug’s simple dosing schedule with mild side effect profile makes it a practical option for patients as combination therapy. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(8):837-843. doi:10.36849/JDD.5845.

Rejuvenating the periorbital area using platelet-rich plasma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Intradermal injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a non-surgical cosmetic therapy to rejuvenate the periorbital area pathologies of wrinkles, periorbital hyperpigmentation (POH), and photoaging. The past decade has seen the adoption of this novel therapy around the world. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating PRP treatment of periorbital pathologies. This is a PRISMA compliant review that includes a comprehensive search of the databases Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov. The search was performed in June 2019 to obtain all peer-reviewed articles published in English that describe the application of PRP to periorbital pathologies. A meta-analysis of patient satisfaction was performed for randomized controlled trials. Nineteen studies treating 455 patients (95% female, age range 28-60) were included. Studies were categorized based on reported outcomes: wrinkles (11 studies), POH (7 studies), and photoaging (6 studies). Patients were treated a mean of 3 times (range 1-8) in mean intervals of 23 days (range 14-56 days). Follow-up averaged 3 months (range 1-6 months). Meta-analysis of 3 randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) shows that patients treated with PRP have increased satisfaction above controls of saline, platelet-poor plasma, mesotherapy, and as an adjunct to laser therapy (overall effect p = 0.001, heterogeneity I2 = 64%). PRP treatment of periorbital area pathologies results in histologic improvements of photoaging, subjective satisfaction score increases, and blind evaluator assessments of rejuvenated skin appearance. Future studies are needed to address limitations of the current literature and should include long-term follow-up, delineation of the POH etiology that is treated, RCTs with low risk of bias, and be absent conflicts of interest or industry sponsors.Trial registration: Prospero Systematic Review Registration ID: CRD42019135968.

Assessing the Risk of Omalizumab Add-on Therapy for Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Amid the current COVID-19 pandemic, there is concern for increased risk of infection while on immunomodulatory therapy. Omalizumab, a monoclonal antibody, is an add-on therapy for the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) when first line therapy alone fails to achieve appropriate response. Current understanding of the response to COVID-19 infection is largely varied and actively under investigation. In the context of a pandemic, it is important to consider the safety profile of omalizumab as it modulates the immune system. We reviewed data from pivotal Phase III clinical trials investigating omalizumab use in CIU patients with a focus on reported respiratory-related adverse events (AEs) to assess these risks. Results from three phase III trials show that omalizumab adjunct therapy does not significantly increase infection risk and severity.

Management of psoriasis with biologics in clinical practice: an update for 2020.

This article aims to address updates on recent clinical trial findings (April 2019 to April 2020) regarding biologic therapy initiation and maintenance for adult patients. Prescribers should use this update as guidance for determining the appropriate biologic class based on patient characteristics and for approaching biologic-experienced patients with refractory psoriasis. This update also may serve as a reference for the recommended dosing regimens of the 11 approved biologics.