Case report: Preimplantation genetic testing for infantile GM1 gangliosidosis.

Ganglioside-monosialic acid (GM1) gangliosidosis (ICD-10: E75.1; OMIM: 230500, 230600, 230650) is a rare autosomal recessive hereditary disease, lysosomal storage disorder caused by mutations in the GLB1 gene that lead to the absence or insufficiency of ß-galactosidase. In this study, we report a case of a Russian family with a history of GM1 gangliosidosis. The family had a child who, from the age of 6 months, experienced a gradual loss of developmental skills, marked by muscle flaccidity, psychomotor retardation, hepatosplenomegaly, and the onset of tonic seizures by the age of 8 months. Funduscopic examination revealed a «cherry red spot¼ in the macula, which is crucial for the diagnosis of lipid storage disorders. To find the pathogenic variants responsible for these clinical symptoms, the next-generation sequencing approach was used. The analysis revealed two variants in the heterozygous state: a frameshift variant c.699delG (rs1452318343, ClinVar ID 928700) in exon 6 and a missense variant c.809A>C (rs371546950, ClinVar ID 198727) in exon 8 of the GLB1 gene. The spouses were advised to plan the pregnancy with assisted reproductive technology (ART), followed by preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorder (PGT-M) on the embryos. Trophectoderm biopsy was performed on 8 out of 10 resulting embryos at the blastocyst stage. To perform PGT-M, we developed a novel testing system, allowing for direct analysis of disease-causing mutations, as well as haplotype analysis based on the study of polymorphic markers-short tandem repeats (STR), located upstream and downstream of the GLB1 gene. The results showed that four embryos were heterozygous carriers of pathogenic variants in the GLB1 gene (#1, 2, 5, 8). Two embryos had a compound heterozygous genotype (#3, 4), while the embryos #7 and 9 did not carry disease-causing alleles of the GLB1 gene. The embryo #7 without pathogenic variants was transferred after consideration of its morphology and growth rate. Prenatal diagnosis in the first trimester showed the absence of the variants analyzed in the GLB1 gene in the fetus. The pregnancy resulted in the delivery of a female infant who did not inherit the disease-causing variants in the GLB1 gene.

Reproductive History of a Woman With 8p and 18p Genetic Imbalance and Minor Phenotypic Abnormalities.

We report on the phenotype and the reproductive history of an adult female patient with an unbalanced karyotype: 8p23 and 18p11.3 terminal deletions and 8p22 duplication. The indication for karyotyping of the 28-year-old patient was a structural rearrangement in her miscarriage specimen: 45,ХХ,der(8;18)t(8;18)(p23;p11.3). Unexpectedly, the patient had the same karyotype with only one normal chromosome 8, one normal chromosome 18, and a derivative chromosome, which was a product of chromosomes 8 and 18 fusion with loss of their short arm terminal regions. Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed that derivative chromosome was a pseudodicentric with an active centromere of chromosome 8. Array comparative genomic hybridization confirmed 8p and 18p terminal deletions and additionally revealed 8p22 duplication with a total of 43 OMIM annotated genes being affected by the rearrangement. The patient had minor facial and cranial dysmorphia and no pronounced physical or mental abnormalities. She was socially normal, had higher education and had been married since the age of 26 years. Considering genetic counseling, the patient had decided to conceive the next pregnancy through in vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for structural chromosomal aberrations (PGT-SR). She underwent four IVF/PGT-SR cycles with a total of 25 oocytes obtained and a total of 10 embryos analyzed. Only one embryo was balanced regarding chromosomes 8 and 18, while the others were unbalanced and demonstrated different combinations of the normal chromosomes 8 and 18 and the derivative chromosome. The balanced embryo was transferred, but the pregnancy was not registered. After four unsuccessful IVF/PGT-SR cycles, the patient conceived naturally. Non-invasive prenatal testing showed additional chromosome 18. The prenatal cytogenetic analysis of chorionic villi revealed an abnormal karyotype: 46,ХХ,der(8;18)t(8;18)(p23;p11.3)mat,+18. The pregnancy was terminated for medical reasons. The patient has a strong intention to conceive a karyotypically normal fetus. However, genetic counseling regarding this issue is highly challenging. Taking into account a very low chance of balanced gametes, emotional stress caused by numerous unsuccessful attempts to conceive a balanced embryo and increasing age of the patient, an IVF cycle with a donor oocyte should probably be considered.

Whole­exome sequencing in Russian children with non­type 1 diabetes mellitus reveals a wide spectrum of genetic variants in MODY­related and unrelated genes.

The present study reports on the frequency and the spectrum of genetic variants causative of monogenic diabetes in Russian children with non­type 1 diabetes mellitus. The present study included 60 unrelated Russian children with non­type 1 diabetes mellitus diagnosed before the age of 18 years. Genetic variants were screened using whole­exome sequencing (WES) in a panel of 35 genes causative of maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) and transient or permanent neonatal diabetes. Verification of the WES results was performed using PCR­direct sequencing. A total of 38 genetic variants were identified in 33 out of 60 patients (55%). The majority of patients (27/33, 81.8%) had variants in MODY­related genes: GCK (n=19), HNF1A (n=2), PAX4 (n=1), ABCC8 (n=1), KCNJ11 (n=1), GCK+HNF1A (n=1), GCK+BLK (n=1) and GCK+BLK+WFS1 (n=1). A total of 6 patients (6/33, 18.2%) had variants in MODY­unrelated genes: GATA6 (n=1), WFS1 (n=3), EIF2AK3 (n=1) and SLC19A2 (n=1). A total of 15 out of 38 variants were novel, including GCK, HNF1A, BLK, WFS1, EIF2AK3 and SLC19A2. To summarize, the present study demonstrates a high frequency and a wide spectrum of genetic variants causative of monogenic diabetes in Russian children with non­type 1 diabetes mellitus. The spectrum includes previously known and novel variants in MODY­related and unrelated genes, with multiple variants in a number of patients. The prevalence of GCK variants indicates that diagnostics of monogenic diabetes in Russian children may begin with testing for MODY2. However, the remaining variants are present at low frequencies in 9 different genes, altogether amounting to ~50% of the cases and highlighting the efficiency of using WES in non­GCK­MODY cases.

Catechol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met polymorphism is associated with increased risk of multiple uterine leiomyomas either positive or negative for MED12 exon 2 mutations.

AIMS: To study the possible association of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) Val158Met polymorphism with multiple and solitary uterine leiomyomas (ULs) and to check whether the COMT Val/Val genotype is associated with MED12 exon 2 mutations in fibroids. METHODS: The COMT Val158Met allele and genotype frequencies were compared between age-matched women with ULs (n=104) and controls (n=59). Patients with UL were subcategorised by diagnosis of solitary (n=59) or multiple (n=45) fibroids and by the presence of somatic MED12 exon 2 mutations in at least one fibroid (n=32) or in neither fibroid (n=26). The association of COMT Val/Val genotype with the presence of any ULs, solitary/multiple ULs and ULs positive/negative for MED12 exon 2 mutations was evaluated by χ2 tests using a dominant genotype model (G/G vs G/A+A/A) and expressed as ORs and 95% CIs. RESULTS: The COMT Val/Val genotype frequency did not differ between the patients with UL and the controls (28.8% vs 18.6%, p=0.149, OR 1.77; CI 0.81 to 3.86). However, it was significantly higher in the patients who had multiple UL compared with the solitary UL (40% vs 20.3%, p=0.028, OR 2.61; CI 1.09 to 6.24) and to the controls (40% vs 18.6%, p=0.016, OR 2.91; CI 1.20 to 7.06). No association of the COMT Val/Val genotype with UL-specific MED12 exon 2 mutations was found (p=0.662, OR 0.77; CI 0.23 to 2.53). CONCLUSIONS: Women with COMT Val/Val genotype are at high risk of developing multiple uterine fibroids either positive or negative for MED12 exon 2 mutations. These data are important to design new strategies for UL prophylaxis and treatment.

Frequency and Spectrum of MED12 Exon 2 Mutations in Multiple Versus Solitary Uterine Leiomyomas From Russian Patients.

Uterine leiomyomas (ULs) are common benign tumors affecting women of different ethnicities. A large proportion of UL has mutations in MED12. Multiple and solitary ULs usually manifest with different severities, suggesting that their origin and growth pattern may be driven by different molecular mechanisms. Here, we compared the frequency and the spectrum of MED12 exon 2 mutations between multiple (n=82) and solitary (n=40) ULs from Russian patients. Overall, we detected MED12 exon 2 mutations in 51.6% (63/122) of ULs. The frequency of MED12 exon 2 mutations was almost two-fold higher in samples from the multiple UL patients than in those from the solitary UL patients - 61% (50/82) versus 32.5% (13/40). The increased MED12 exon 2 mutation frequency in the multiple ULs was not accompanied by significant alterations in the spectrum of mutation categories, which included missense mutations, deletions, splicing defects, and multiple (double/triple) mutations. Each mutation category had a unique mutation set, comprising both frequent and rarely encountered mutations, which did and did not overlap between the studied groups, respectively. We conclude that in contrast to the solitary ULs, the multiple ULs predominantly originate through MED12-associated mechanisms. The nature of these mechanisms seems to be similar in solitary and multiple ULs, as they contain similar mutations. In multiple UL patients, they are likely to be nonsporadic, indicating the existence of specific factors predisposing to multiple UL development. These data suggest that to clearly understand UL pathogenesis, solitary and multiple tumors should probably be analyzed as separate sets.