[Jury prize of the Austrian National Prize 2018 : 12 years European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) at the University Eye Clinic Graz]. / Jurypreis des Österreichischen Staatspreises 2018 : Zwölf Jahre EFQM (European Foundation for Quality Management) an der Universitäts-Augenklinik Graz.

BACKGROUND: The European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) approach has been successfully implemented in healthcare but reports about EFQM awards at university clinics are lacking so far. Can a non-profit organization, such as a university eye department successfully compete with profit companies from industry for the National Prize of the Federal Ministry for Innovation and Business in Austria? MATERIAL AND METHODS: Following successful committed to excellence (C2E) assessments in 2008 and 2010, a 70-page corporate report was compiled strictly according to the EFQM logic (latest version 2013), consisting of basic concepts, criteria matrix and results/approach/deployment/assessment and refinement (RADAR) logic, which formed the basis for an 1­day assessment in 2018. Special emphasis was laid on the development and presentation of the strategy by means of the X­matrix (according to Hoshin-Kanri) between the University Eye Department and its shareholders, the Styrian Hospital Association (KAGes) owned by the Federal State of Styria and the Medical University financed by the Austrian State Federal Ministry. RESULTS: The total points score in the recognized for excellence (R4E) assessment 2018 was 500-550 points, which prompted the jury to award a jury prize of the Austrian National Prize (focus: participative leadership). Potential for improvement, which needs to be worked on in the near future was the alignment of core processes with the main performance indicators of the University Eye Department, which arises from its mission consisting of patient care, research, teaching, training and public relations activities. The development of the strategy with the shareholders has developed from a potential to a strength compared to the R4E assessment from 2017. CONCLUSION: Feedback from the assessor team after the site visit is the greatest added value for a university eye department and/or business enterprise. Improvement measures can be effectively derived following the RADAR logic and lead to a higher quality standard/score and improved performance.

Repeated mobility testing for later artificial visual function evaluation.

The study investigates the utility of a newly designed mobility test for repeated testing of visual function in patients with severe visual impairment and future application in evaluating functional progress in patients with artificial vision. Ten subjects divided into three groups based on visual acuity (VA) ranging from light perception to 20/200 and reduced visual field (VF) were included in the study. The mobility test consisted of using a set of four different but structurally similar and relatively short mazes having a constant number of obstacles of various sizes. The subjects, divided into three groups by acuity, passed through each course several times. In general, the patients with better VA had a larger extent of VF. Average speed and number of contacts were recorded as measures of performance. The average passing times of the groups through the courses were significantly different (p = 0.03), which was influenced by VA and VF. There was no significant difference in average number of contacts between the groups (p = 0.15). The mobility test proved to be appropriate for gaining statistically relevant results in repeated individual testing of patients with severe vision impairment. Results show promise for use this mobility test as a tool for assessing visual function of patients undergoing implantation of a visual prosthesis for artificial vision.