[Investigation of Factors Related to Overall Survival in Patients Treated with Gemcitabine plus Paclitaxel(Albumin Suspension)for Advanced or Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer].

In cancer chemotherapy, identifying factors that may affect overall survival is clinically beneficial. In this study, we examined the factors associated with overall survival in patients treated with gemcitabine plus paclitaxel(albumin suspension) (GN)for pancreatic cancer. We included 91 pancreatic cancer patients who underwent GN therapy as the first-line treatment from January 2015-November 2021. In addition to survival from the start of therapy, the factors surveyed were patient background(gender, age, BMI, etc), dose at the start of treatment, baseline laboratory values, presence or absence of neutrophil count reduction, and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score(mGPS). Multivariate analysis showed that a neutrophil count reduction of Grade 3 or higher(p=0.004)and mGPS≤1(p=0.004)significantly increased overall survival. Consequently, 54.9% of patients(50/91)showed a neutrophil count reduction of Grade 3 or higher, and 35.2% of patients (32/91)showed expression of the first course. The study suggests that neutrophil count reduction of Grade 3 or higher and mGPS≤1 are indicators of prolonged overall survival. In particular, neutrophil count reduction had a high incidence in the first course; therefore, appropriate management is required from early stages of treatment. In addition, nutritional support care should be considered prior to starting treatment.

[Incidence of Immune-Related Adverse Events after Switching from a Conventional Regimen of Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab to the Extended Dosing Interval Regimen].

A new nivolumab and pembrolizumab monotherapy regimen with double the conventional dose and longer dosing intervals( the new regimen)has been approved. Here, we report the incidence of immune-related adverse events(irAEs)in the early phase of switching from the conventional regimen to the new regimen at Ogaki Municipal Hospital. Thirty-seven patients switched to the new regimen between October 2020 and February 2021: 7(18.9%)switched to nivolumab and 5 (14.3%)to pembrolizumab. Two of the 7 patients treated with nivolumab developed irAEs. One patient developed Grade 3 colitis on day 51 following the switch to the new regimen, and the treatment was discontinued. The other patient developed Grade 3 adrenal insufficiency on day 72 and was hospitalized. No irAEs were observed with pembrolizumab treatment. These results suggest that high-severity grade irAEs may occur early after switching to the new regimen.

[Comparative Safety Assessment of Ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in Second- and Later-Line Treatment in Japanese Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma].

The addition of anti-angiogenic agents to cytotoxic agents to improve outcomes has become the standard treatment for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. In this study, we evaluated the safety of bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI with that of ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI in second- and later-line treatment in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Patients who received ramucirumab or bevacizumab as a second- and later-line treatment between January 2016 and March 2020 were included. Treatment regimens, body surface area, dosage, number of treatment courses, and adverse events( AEs) were evaluated. There were 66 and 17 patients in the bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI and ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI groups, respectively. All patients developed AEs. AEs of grade 3/4 were documented in 84.8% and 100% of the patients in the bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI and ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI groups, respectively. Progressive disease was the most common reason for treatment discontinuation in both groups. Twelve (18.2%) and 5 (29.4%) patients in the bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI and ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI groups, respectively, discontinued treatment due to AEs. The most common AEs leading to discontinuation were malaise and decreased performance status. The findings of our study indicated that both bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI and ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI groups have a high incidence of AEs, and that medical professionals need to be aware of the frequent development of malaise and decreased performance status.

Tolerability and safety of real-world use of pomalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Pomalidomide (POM) is a second-generation immunomodulatory agent with proven efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) proven to be refractory to previous treatment with lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib. We herein conducted a retrospective analysis of 14 RRMM patients receiving POM to determine its tolerability and safety in the clinical setting. The median age of the patients was 72 years (range, 58-84 years), and 85.7% of the patients were aged >70 years. The most frequent treatment dose was 3 mg/day. POM dose reductions were required in 54.5% (6/11) of the patients. The patient data were compared among three age groups (<70, 70-75 and >75 years) and there was only significant difference in daily POM treatment dose. The tolerability of POM must be confirmed, particularly in elderly patients. Dose reduction from 4 to 3 mg occurred during the second cycle in 83.3% (5/6) of the patients. It is important to determine the tolerability of POM in the early phases of treatment. The most frequently reported grade 3/4 hematological adverse events were neutropenia (64.3%), anemia (64.3%) and thrombocytopenia (57.1%). Although the median number of treatment cycles was 4 (range, 1-13), 21.4% (3/14) of the patients with a performance status (PS) of 3 were administered only 1 treatment cycle. The tolerability of POM was low among patients with poor PS and an aggressive treatment introduction should be avoided. However, 21.4% (3/14) of the patients were able to continue treatment for >1 year and some patients received long-term therapy. POM does not require dose modification for renal function, and multiple capsule doses are available, which is an advantage of POM compared with LEN. POM may be administered to late-stage RRMM patients in a real-world clinical setting, but elderly patients or those with poor PS must be treated with caution. In this manner, the treatment options for RRMM patients may be expanded by assessing the tolerability and safety of POM.

Effect of the timing of discontinuation of last-line chemotherapy on patient prognosis in advanced and recurrent gastric cancer.

The present study aimed to determine the effect of the timing of treatment discontinuation on the prognosis of patients with advanced and recurrent gastric cancer chemotherapy. Between July 2014 and March 2017, 127 patients who underwent chemotherapy for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer at Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan) were examined. To determine factors associated with survival, multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model, and hazard ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. The reasons for discontinuation of last-line chemotherapy and the last hospitalization prior to mortality were surveyed. Age (≤51 years), number of treatment lines (≤1 line), and days between last dose of the final chemotherapy regimen and death (≤79 days) were independently and significantly associated with survival in the multivariate analysis. Compared with patients who did not receive chemotherapy in the last 79 days of life, those who received chemotherapy in the last 79 days of life days had a hazard ratio of 1.858 (95% CI, 1.059-3.261; P=0.031) for mortality. A decrease in the performance status was responsible for treatment discontinuation in 51 of 75 cases among patients who received chemotherapy in the last 79 days of life and 9 of 26 cases among patients who did not receive chemotherapy in this duration (P<0.001). Among patients who received chemotherapy in the last 79 days of life, 67 patients were hospitalized prior to mortality; among patients who did not receive chemotherapy in this duration, 15 patients were hospitalized prior to mortality (P<0.001). In conclusion, continuation of chemotherapy until just prior to mortality does not prolong the survival time in patients with advanced and recurrent gastric cancer.

The incidence and timing of leukocyte overshoot after pegfilgrastim administration.

INTRODUCTION: Pegfilgrastim is a PEGylated formulation of filgrastim with a long half-life. It is highly convenient and less burdensome for patients. However, white blood cell count may temporarily increase after administration; in particular, a leukocyte overshoot may be observed. The present study retrospectively examined the incidence and timing of leukocyte overshoot after pegfilgrastim administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients (118 occasions of pegfilgrastim) were evaluated. Leukocyte overshoot was defined as white blood cell count ≥10,000/mm3 exceeding the reference value. RESULTS: Leukocyte overshoot was observed in 71.2% (84/118) occasions, in 76.4% (42/55) patients. The maximum white blood cell count ≥30,000/mm3 was observed in 30.5% (36/118) occasions in 45.5% (25/55) patients and was observed in 39.3% (33/84) occasions on day 1 after pegfilgrastim administration and 26.2% (22/84) on day 2. Leukocyte overshoot has been observed in only 23.1% (9/39) patients administered with normal granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. However, there were no patients with white blood cell counts ≥30,000/mm3. CONCLUSION: There was a higher frequency of occurrence of leukocyte overshoot in response to pegfilgrastim than in response to normal granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. High incidence of leukocyte overshoot was observed when blood was collected 1-2 days after administration of pegfilgrastim. It is important for patients to understand the characteristics of pegfilgrastim by conducting pharmaceutical guidance.

Usefulness of a pharmacist outpatient service for S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.

S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy is an outpatient treatment for gastric cancer. To evaluate the role of the pharmacist outpatient service in increasing medication adherence and reducing adverse events associated with S-1, the present study retrospectively analyzed prescription recommendations from pharmacists to physicians and the persistence rate of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy use in patients with gastric cancer. A total of 40 subjects who utilized the pharmacist outpatient service between November 2014 and March 2016 comprised the pharmacist group; and 94 patients who underwent S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer between September 2012 and October 2014, but not as pharmacist outpatients, comprised the control group. Data on the prescription recommendations, persistence rate of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for 1 year and relative dose intensity were collected. The number of interventions and consultations for the pharmacist outpatient group were 40 and 644, respectively. Prescription recommendations regarding dosage, drug administration interval, and supportive therapy were provided in 62, 15 and 132 cases, respectively. The prescription proposal acceptance rate was 92.5%. The persistence rate of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for 1 year was significantly higher in the pharmacist group (82.5%) compared with the control group (39.4%; P<0.0001). The discontinuation rate due to adverse events was significantly lower in the pharmacist group (7.5%) compared with the control group (31.9%; P=0.0015). In subjects who completed S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy, the relative dose intensities in the control and pharmacist groups were 82.9 and 84.7%, respectively. In conclusion, the continued pharmaceutical intervention ensured a high persistence rate of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.

Comparing the cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX, nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, gemcitabine and S-1 for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

The recommended chemotherapy regimens for pancreatic cancer include the combination of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX), nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX) plus gemcitabine (GEM), GEM alone and tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium (S-1) alone. Although the cost-effectiveness of metastatic pancreatic cancer chemotherapies has been extensively investigated, to the best of our knowledge, no study has specifically compared the cost-effectiveness among FOLFIRINOX, nab-PTX + GEM, GEM and S-1 regimens to date. The aim of the present study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of these four regimens. The expected costs were calculated based on data from patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who were treated with the FOLFIRINOX, nab-PTX + GEM, GEM alone or S-1 alone. The median survival time (MST) from randomized controlled trials in the literature was used to evaluate the therapeutic effect of these regimens. The cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated using expected costs and MST for these four regimens. The expected costs per patient for the FOLFIRINOX, nab-PTX + GEM, GEM or S-1 regimens were ¥6,361,191.4, ¥4,802,063.6, ¥540,091.4 and ¥528,514.6, respectively, and the cost-effectiveness ratios per month were ¥642,544.6/MST, ¥470,790.5/MST, ¥81,832.0/MST and ¥55,633.1/MST, respectively. In conclusion, the nab-PTX + GEM and FOLFIRINOX regimens were associated with a high therapeutic efficacy and high cost. The GEM regimen exhibited a lower therapeutic efficacy compared with the nab-PTX + GEM and FOLFIRINOX regimens, but the findings of this study indicated that the GEM and S-1 regimens were the most cost-effective regimens.

Analysis of the incidence of tumor lysis syndrome in patients with hematological malignancies treated with rasburicase.

The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in patients with hematological malignancies treated with rasburicase, and to evaluate the dose and duration of rasburicase administration. A total of 52 patients were enrolled. The background of the patients, incidence of TLS and laboratory data were retrospectively examined; in addition, the dose and duration of rasburicase administration and the factors affecting the onset of TLS were evaluated and compared among TLS risk categories. During the study period, 2 (3.8%) of the patients developed clinical TLS and 24 (46.2%) developed laboratory TLS (LTLS). Although the LTLS rate was very high, there were no life-threatening cases of TLS. The median daily dose of rasburicase administered to all patients was 7.5 mg/day (interquartile range, 7.5-9.0 mg/day), and the daily weight-based dose was 0.147 mg/kg/day (range, 0.126-0.178 mg/kg/day). The administration duration was 3 days (interquartile range, 3-4 days). Additionally, there was no significant association between TLS risk classification and daily rasburicase administration dose, duration, or post-administration laboratory data. The factors affecting the onset of TLS included serum uric acid level, as well as serum creatinine and phosphate levels. Rasburicase was highly effective in the prevention and management of hyperuricemia, even at a low-dose (7.5 mg/day) and a duration that was 3 days shorter compared with that recommended by the manufacturer. Therefore, clinicians should administer rasburicase based on their clinical judgment, taking into consideration the cost-effectiveness of this therapy.

Pharmaco-economic analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III colorectal cancer.

Comparison of the costs of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOX) with that of FOLFOX6 (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin [LV] + oxaliplatin) as an adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II or III colorectal cancer has previously been reported. However, there are no reports comparing uracil and tegafur (UFT)/LV with capecitabine. Therefore, the current study compared the costs of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens including CapeOX, FOLFOX6, capecitabine and UFT/LV. The costs of chemotherapeutic drugs and for the prevention and treatment of adverse events were evaluated, as these account for the bulk of the treatment costs. Costs were expressed in Japanese Yen (US dollars). The mean costs of the chemotherapeutic drugs per patient, for an entire course of treatment, were ¥882,632 ($8,406) for UFT/LV, ¥353,290 ($3,365) for capecitabine, ¥1,436,218 ($13,678) for FOLFOX6 and ¥1,255,630 ($11,958) for CapeOX. The mean costs associated with adverse events per patient were ¥2,210 ($21) for UFT/LV, ¥6,749 ($64) for capecitabine, ¥173,432 ($1,652) for FOLFOX6 and ¥107,430 ($1,023) for CapeOX. Therefore, the capecitabine regimen contributes to reducing costs for the management of patients with colorectal cancer who have had surgery.

Evaluation of the role and usefulness of a pharmacist outpatient service for patients undergoing monotherapy with oral anti-cancer agents.

Introduction When rapid feedback to physicians must be provided, e.g. monitoring therapy with the oral anticoagulant warfarin or providing therapeutic support for patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy, the involvement of pharmacists is required for outpatients. We launched a pharmacist outpatient service for patients with cancer taking oral anti-cancer agents. We evaluated the role and usefulness of the pharmacist outpatient service for these patients undergoing oral monotherapy with anti-cancer agents. Methods Data regarding prescription recommendations were collected from the drug management guidance records of 154 patients who consulted the pharmacist outpatient service between July 2013 and September 2015. In addition, the rates of prescription recommendation adherence were calculated. Between April and August 2015, a self-reported questionnaire was administered to 47 patients undergoing therapy with oral anti-cancer agents who were visiting the pharmacist outpatient service at the Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan). Results Prescription recommendations were given to 235 cases. The total rate of adherence to the prescription recommendations was 94.9% (223/235 cases). The majority of prescription recommendations regarding supportive care were those for moisturizing agents (20.9%), analgesics (20.9%), steroid ointments (12.7%), and antihypertensive agents (10.8%). When continued guidance was provided, significant changes were observed for survey items 3 (knowing the side effects of the medication), 8 (worrying about side effects), and 12 (interest in prescribed medicine) ( p = 0.0049, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.0164, respectively). Conclusion Our study showed that continued pharmaceutical intervention resulted in a deeper understanding of the medications' side effects, and it reduced anxiety levels in patients undergoing monotherapy with oral anti-cancer agents.

[Treatment Continuation and Safety of Eribulin for the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer].

The purpose of treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer is to maintain the patient's quality of life(QOL)with continued treatment for as long as possible.Eribulin was approved in April 2011 for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, further increasing the selection of therapies available for the management of this disease.The current study presents a retrospective review of 31 patients who received eribulin in our hospital, and analyzes the factors related to the continuation and safety of its use.The median treatment continuation was 114 days(range, 8-281 days), and the treatment involved an average of 5 courses(range, 1-13 courses).There were no significant differences in the continuation of eribulin with regard to the number of previous chemotherapy regimens and modifications undergone by the patients.Neutropenia accounted for 80.6% of adverse eventsBGrade 3; however, the recovery was rapid.The rates of peripheral neuropathy and liver function failures were 12.9% and 6.5%, respectively. These results suggest that eribulin can be continued to be administered with the aim of maintaining QOL, and the therapy can be adjusted according to the patient's situation and the occurrence of adverse events by reducing the dose and treatment delays.

Comparison of cost-effectiveness of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet for treating advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer.

Regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet regimens are standard third-line or later treatments for advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer with no significant difference in efficacy. The present study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of using regorafenib vs. the trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet. The expected cost was calculated based on data from patients with advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer who were treated with regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet. The median survival time (MST) from the CORRECT and the RECOURSE study was used to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of the regimens. The cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated from the expected cost and MST for the two regimens. The expected cost per patient for the regorafenib and the trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet regimen was ¥705,330.3 and ¥371,198.7, respectively, and the cost-effectiveness ratio was ¥110,207.9/MST and ¥52,281.5/MST, respectively. In conclusion, the findings of the present study demonstrated that the trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet regimen is more cost-effective compared with the regorafenib regimen.

Neutropenia as a prognostic factor and safety of second-line therapy with S-1 for advanced or recurrent pancreatic cancer.

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the safety of S-1 as second-line therapy and to evaluate the association between neutropenia occurring during first-line gemcitabine (GEM) therapy and survival for advanced or recurrent pancreatic cancer (APC). Between January, 2010 and December, 2014, 123 APC patients received chemotherapy at the Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan). Of those, 37 received GEM as first-line and S-1 as a second-line therapy (GEM→S-1 group). A further 60 patients received GEM as first-line therapy, but did not receive second-line therapy (GEM group). The median overall survival in the GEM→S-1 (n=37) and GEM (n=60) groups was 323 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 138-218.9 days] and 172 days (95% CI: 105-184.4 days), respectively (P=0.0004). The median overall survival in the mild (grade ≤2; n=63) and severe (grade ≥3; n=34) neutropenia groups was 178 days (95% CI: 182-275 days) and 330 days (95% CI: 297-514 days), respectively (log-rank test, P=0.0023). The severe non-haematological toxicities associated with S-1 as second-line therapy were nausea (2.7%) and hand-foot syndrome (2.7%). Second-line S-1 treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 5.4% (2/37) of the cases. In conclusion, neutropenia occurring during GEM therapy administered as first-line treatment to APC patients was strongly associated with a better prognosis. S-1 therapy as second-line treatment was associated with a low incidence of severe adverse events and the patients were able to successfully continue treatment.

Prophylactic Efficacy Against Herpes Zoster and Costs Difference Between Acyclovir and Valaciclovir in Hematological Patients.

BACKGROUND: Immunocompromised hematological patients are at increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ). We examined the efficacy of acyclovir and valaciclovir in preventing HZ. We also created a simulation to reduce prophylactic medicine costs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 573 hematological patients who received chemotherapy, and assessed the difference in the costs between the acyclovir (Zovirax®) and valaciclovir (Valtrex®) groups. RESULTS: Forty-four out of the 573 patients (7.7%) developed HZ. Out of them, there were 37 patients (84.1%) who received corticosteroids. Moreover, in total, there were 67 patients receiving acyclovir prophylaxis and 42 patients receiving valaciclovir prophylaxis, out of which one from each group occurred with HZ. The total 5-year cost of acyclovir and valaciclovir was ¥2,869,917 and ¥4,809,952, respectively. Therefore, by changing from valaciclovir to acyclovir, medical costs could be reduced by 28.3%. Additionally, switching to generic inexpensive acyclovir would possibly reduce them to 15.0%. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy, including corticosteroids, is associated with a high incidence of HZ. Additionally, there was no prophylactic difference between acyclovir and valaciclovir. We expect that use of generic acyclovir could reduce prophylaxis costs by 85.0%.

Chemotherapy continuity and incidence of febrile neutropenia with CHOP therapy in an outpatient setting.

The cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (CHOP) regimen is considered to be a standard treatment for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Patients receiving CHOP chemotherapy often experience febrile neutropenia (FN) due to myelotoxicity. The proper management of FN is essential to guarantee a positive outcome of the NHL treatment. Therefore, the present study retrospectively examined chemotherapy continuity and the incidence of FN during CHOP therapy in an outpatient setting. The subjects were 136 patients who received CHOP chemotherapy between January 2012 and December 2014. A total of 31 patients unable to be treated in an outpatient setting were excluded from the study. Of the remaining 105 patients, 73 patients who did not require hospitalization during the chemotherapy treatment were included in the non-hospitalized group, and 32 patients who required hospitalization during chemotherapy treatment were included in the re-hospitalization group. The numbers of patients from these two groups who completed the planned treatment were 71 and 24, respectively (P<0.01). In addition, the duration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment was 5.3±1.22 and 6.1±1.46 days, respectively (P<0.01). The numbers of patients experiencing FN in an outpatient setting were 14 and 19, respectively (P<0.01). During administration of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF, the incidence of FN was 21.0% (22/105) in cycle 1. In conclusion, the present study has revealed a requirement to educate patients about infection prevention prior to the first cycle of chemotherapy. Patients who require the administration of long- term G-CSF are at risk of unplanned re-hospitalization, and treating them with polyethylene glycol G-CSF to reduce the number of required injections should be considered as an option. Therefore, proper supportive therapy and management of infection are important to safely treat patients with CHOP in an outpatient setting.

Adherence and awareness of the therapeutic intent of oral anticancer agents in an outpatient setting.

The aim of the present study was to clarify the adherence and awareness of oral anticancer agents by type and therapeutic purpose in outpatients prescribed with tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium (S-1) or capecitabine. Outpatients undergoing treatment with the S-1 or capecitabine oral anticancer agents at Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan) in June 2013 completed a questionnaire survey and the survey findings were evaluated. No significant differences in medication adherence were identified between the patients administered S-1 and the patients administered capecitabine (P=0.4586). In addition, no significant differences were identified in therapeutic purpose between adjuvant therapy, and advanced and recurrent therapies. However, for S-1 and capecitabine, medication adherence was significantly higher in those undergoing combination therapy compared with those undergoing monotherapy (P=0.0046). In addition, for patients taking S-1, the median age for good adherence was significantly lower than that for insufficient adherence (66.1±10.5 vs. 72.1±7.9 years, respectively; P=0.0035). Furthermore, a significant negative correlation was identified between the awareness score of research regarding the medication and age (n=109; P=0.0045). In conclusion, for patients treated with S-1 or capecitabine, the type and therapeutic purpose of oral anticancer agents did not affect medication adherence. Elderly patients expressed a low interest in medications and typically exhibited insufficient medication adherence. Therefore, patient guidance by pharmacists is important, as it may result in improved medication adherence and an improved understanding of the treatment side-effects in patients self-administering prescribed drugs.

Oral anticancer agent medication adherence by outpatients.

In the present study, medication adherence and factors affecting adherence were examined in patients taking oral anticancer agents. In June 2013, 172 outpatients who had been prescribed oral anticancer agents by Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Gifu, Japan) completed a questionnaire survey, with answers rated on a five-point Likert scale. The factors that affect medication adherence were evaluated using a customer satisfaction (CS) analysis. For patients with good and insufficient adherence to medication, the median ages were 66 years (range, 21-85 years) and 73 years (range, 30-90 years), respectively (P=0.0004), while the median dosing time was 131 days (range, 3-3,585 days) and 219 days (24-3,465 days), respectively (P=0.0447). In 36.0% (62 out of 172) of the cases, there was insufficient medication adherence; 64.5% of those cases (40 out of 62) showed good medication compliance (4-5 point rating score). However, these patients did not fully understand the effects or side-effects of the drugs, giving a score of three points or less. The percentage of patients with good medication compliance was 87.2% (150 out of 172). Through the CS analysis, three items, the interest in the drug, the desire to consult about the drug and the condition of the patient, were extracted as items for improvement. Overall, the medication compliance of the patients taking the oral anticancer agents was good, but the medication adherence was insufficient. To improve medication adherence, a better understanding of the effectiveness and necessity of drugs and their side-effects is required. In addition, the interest of patients in their medication should be encouraged and intervention should be tailored to the condition of the patient. These steps should lead to improved medication adherence.

Safety and continuity of second- and third-line therapy with paclitaxel or irinotecan for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer.

In the treatment of advanced or recurrent gastric cancer, the prolongation of survival depends on the use of second-line therapy, with paclitaxel (PTX) or irinotecan (CPT-11) as the key agents. The present study aimed to retrospectively investigate the safety and continuity of weekly PTX and CPT-11 monotherapy as second- or third-line treatment for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. A total of 62 patients who had received PTX or CPT-11 for gastric cancer at the Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan) were retrospectively reviewed. Of the 47 patients who received PTX as second-line therapy, 13 (27.7%) received third-line therapy with CPT-11. Second-line PTX and third-line CPT-11 were discontinued due to progressive disease (PD) in 27 and 7 cases, respectively, and deterioration in the performance status (PS) in 20 and 4 cases, respectively. Only 1 case of discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) was reported for third-line CPT-11. Furthermore, of the 15 patients who received CPT-11 as second-line treatment, 11 (73.3%) then received PTX as third-line treatment. Second-line CPT-11 and third-line PTX were discontinued due to PD in 9 and 6 cases, respectively, and deterioration in the PS in 4 and 5 cases, respectively, whereas there was only 1 case of discontinuation due to AEs for second-line CPT-11. Severe AEs for PTX and CPT-11 were infrequent; however, the frequency of diarrhea was high when PTX was administered as third-line therapy (63.6%), whereas the frequency of malaise was high when CPT-11 was administered as second- (73.3%) and third-line (76.9%) therapy. In conclusion, severe AEs due to PTX and CPT-11 as second- and third-line treatment for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer are infrequent and patients are generally able to continue treatment. However, the possibility of diarrhea with third-line PTX and malaise with second- and third-line CPT-11 treatment should be considered when planning chemotherapy.

[Continuation of chemotherapy with bevacizumab for advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer].

We evaluated the association between the number of treatment courses with the concomitant use of bevacizumab(BV) and the reasons for discontinuation of the regimen in patients who received FOLFOX with or without BV as first-line chemotherapy and FOLFIRI with or without BV as second-line chemotherapy for advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer. In first-line treatment, 12 (2-46) and 10 (2-60) treatment courses were administered with and without BV, respectively, and this difference was not significant (p=0.60). In second-line treatment after first-line treatment with the concomitant use of BV, 11 (1-23) and 3 (1-12) treatment courses were administered with and without BV, respectively, and this difference was significant (p<0.01). Discontinuation due to adverse reactions was more frequent for first-line treatment (34.9%) than for second-line treatment (6.2%; p<0.01). The reasons for discontinuation due to adverse reactions during first-line treatment with BV were often associated with BV, and those during first-line treatment without BV were most often associated with peripheral neuropathy. Therefore, we conclude that early detection and prevention of adverse reactions are important in first-line treatment and that pharmacists as well should be involved in the monitoring and management of adverse reactions, although continued administration of BV even during second-line treatment after first-line treatment with BV is recommended.