Comparison of synbiotics combined with enteral nutrition and prophylactic antibiotics as supportive care in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A multicenter randomized study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Established supportive care to reduce the toxicity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is lacking. This multicenter randomized study compared the administration of synbiotics combined with enteral nutrition (EN) versus that of prophylactic antibiotics as supportive care treatment for patients with esophageal cancer undergoing NAC. METHODS: Patients with advanced esophageal cancer scheduled to receive NAC were randomly administered either prophylactic antibiotics (antibiotic group) or synbiotics combined with EN (Syn + EN group). The primary endpoint was the febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence during the first course, and the secondary endpoints were other adverse events, changes in intestinal environment, including fecal microbiota, organic acid concentrations, pH, and chemotherapy tolerability. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were enrolled. The FN incidence was nonsignificantly lower (P = 0.088) in the Syn + EN group. The incidences of grade 4 neutropenia and grades 2-4 diarrhea were significantly lower in the Syn + EN group (P = 0.014 and 0.033, respectively). Relative dose intensity was significantly higher in the Syn + EN group (92.0 ± 10.9%) than in the antibiotic group (83.2 ± 18.2%) (P = 0.01). Alpfa diversity was significantly higher in the Syn + EN group than in the antibiotic after chemotherapy (P = 0.002). The numbers of Bifidobacterium (P < 0.05), Lacticaseibacillus (P < 0.001), and Enterobacteriaceae (P < 0.001) and the concentration of acetic acid (P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the Syn + EN group than in the antibiotic group after chemotherapy. The severity of diarrhea and occurrence of FN were significantly correlated with Clostridioides difficile abundance and were significantly inversely correlated with acetic acid concentration after chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Synbiotics combined with EN may be an alternative supportive care treatment to prophylactic antibiotics in patients with cancer undergoing toxic chemotherapy (https://jrct.niph.go.jp; jRCTs051180153).

Phase II Adjuvant Cancer-specific Vaccine Therapy for Esophageal Cancer Patients Curatively Resected After Preoperative Therapy With Pathologically Positive Nodes; Possible Significance of Tumor Immune Microenvironment in its Clinical Effects.

OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the efficacy of adjuvant vaccine monotherapy using 3 Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-A∗24-restricted tumor-specific peptide antigens for ESCC, upregulated lung cancer 10, cell division cycle associated 1, and KH domain-containing protein overexpressed in cancer 1. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ESCC patients with pathologically positive nodes (pN(+)) have a high risk for postoperative recurrence, despite curative resection after preoperative therapy. Subclinical micrometastases are an appropriate target for cancer vaccine. METHODS: This is a non-randomized prospective phase II clinical trial (UMIN000003557). ESCC patients curatively resected after preoperative therapy with pN(+) were allocated into the control and vaccine groups (CG and VG) according to the HLA-A status. One mg each of three epitope peptides was postoperatively injected 10 times weekly followed by 10 times biweekly to the VG. The primary and secondary endpoints were relapse-free survival (RFS) and esophageal cancer-specific survival (ECSS), respectively. RESULTS: Thirty were in the CG and 33 in the VG. No significant difference was observed in RFS between the CG and VG (5-year RFS: 32.5% vs 45.3%), but the recurrence rate significantly decreased with the number of peptides which induced antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. The VG showed a significantly higher 5-year ECSS than the CG (60.0% vs 32.4%, P = 0.045) and this difference was more prominent in patients with CD8+ and programmed death-ligand 1 double negative tumor (68.0% vs 17.7%, P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Our cancer peptide vaccine might improve the survival of ESCC patients, which is warranted to be verified in the phase III randomized controlled study.

Controlling lymph node micrometastases by neoadjuvant chemotherapy affects the prognosis in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical significance of micrometastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the difference in controlling micrometastases using different NAC regimens in resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: We analyzed patients with ESCC who underwent esophagectomy with lymph node dissection after NAC with Adriamycin + cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil (ACF) or docetaxel + cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil (DCF). Micrometastasis was defined as a single isolated cancer cell or cluster of cancer cells on the cervical, recurrent nerve, or abdominal LNs as shown by immunohistochemical staining with anti-cytokeratin antibody (AE1/AE3). The associations between micrometastases, recurrence, prognosis, and regimen differences were investigated. RESULTS: One hundred and one cases (ACF group: 51 cases; DCF group: 50 cases) were analyzed. Micrometastases occurred in 24 patients (23.8%): 17/51 (33.3%) in the ACF group and 7/50 (13.5%) in the DCF group (p = 0.0403). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates for patients without (n = 77) and with (n = 24) micrometastases were 62 and 32%, respectively, (hazard ratio, 2.158; 95% confidence interval, 1.170-3.980; stratified log-rank test, p = 0.0115). A multivariate analysis showed that stage pN1 or higher and micrometastases were significant risk factors affecting RFS. CONCLUSION: In resectable advanced ESCC, controlling micrometastases in the LNs after NAC varied by regimen and may be associated with preventing ESCC recurrence.

Risk Factors and Prognostic Impact of Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Esophagogastric Junction Cancer.

PURPOSE: We retrospectively investigated the risk factors for mediastinal lymph node (MLN) metastasis in esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer with an epicenter within 2 cm above and below the anatomical cardia, including both adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). METHODS: Fifty patients who underwent initial surgery for EGJ cancer from January 2002 to December 2013 were included in this study. We defined metastatic lymph nodes as pathological metastases in resected specimens and recurrence within 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients had AC and 16 had SCC; 24 patients underwent transhiatal resection and 26 underwent transthoracic resection. MLN metastasis was observed in 13 patients (26%) regardless of the histological type, 9 of whom had metastasis in the upper and middle mediastinum. Metastasis occurred when the esophageal invasion length (EIL) exceeded 20 mm. In addition, 10/13 patients had stage pN2-3 cancer. Multivariable analysis identified EIL ≥ 20 mm and stage pN2-3 as significant risk factors for MLN metastasis. The 5-year overall survival was 38% and 65% in the MLN-positive and -negative groups, respectively (p = 0.12). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that only stage pN2-3, and not the presence of MLN metastasis, was a significantly poor prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: MLN metastasis in EGJ cancer may have a close association with the EIL of the tumor, but the presence of MLN metastasis itself was not a poor prognostic factor. The significance and indications for MLN dissection should be clarified in prospective clinical trials.

A case of a gastric granular cell tumor preoperatively diagnosed and successfully treated by single-incision laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Granular cell tumors (GCT) in the gastrointestinal tract are rare. Herein, we describe a case of a gastric GCT diagnosed preoperatively by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) and successfully resected by single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). CASE PRESENTATION: A 46-year-old Japanese woman had a tumor located in the angle of the stomach that was approximately 1.5 cm in diameter. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a submucosal tumor (SMT), which was finally diagnosed as a gastric GCT using EUS-FNAB. The tumor was not identified by CT 1 year and 4 months before diagnosis; therefore, because there was a possibility that the tumor was malignant, we performed surgical wedge resection using SILS. The patient had an uneventful recovery postoperatively and was discharged without complications 3 days after surgery. The tumor was pathologically diagnosed as a benign GCT that remained within the muscular layer. No recurrence or complications have occurred in the first 16 months since the surgery. CONCLUSION: Because gastric GCTs are generally benign and are rarely associated with lymph node metastasis, SILS seems to be a safe and feasible surgical approach for treating GCTs.

A simple, novel laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy technique to prevent bowel obstruction after esophagectomy: the "curtain method".

BACKGROUND: Feeding jejunostomy (FJ) is a common treatment to support patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy. However, severe FJ-related complications, such as bowel obstruction, occasionally occur. We investigated the ability of our simple, novel FJ technique, the "curtain method," to prevent bowel obstruction. METHODS: In laparoscopic surgery, the main mechanism of bowel obstruction involves torsion of the mesentery accompanied by migration of the intestine across the fixed FJ through the space surrounded by a triangle comprising the ligament of Treitz, fixed FJ, and spleen rather than adhesion. Our "curtain method" involves closure of this triangle zone with omentum, and the appearance of the lifted omentum resembles a curtain. Sixty patients treated with this modified FJ were retrospectively compared with 13 patients treated with conventional FJ in terms of the incidence of bowel obstruction, peritonitis, stoma site infection, and catheter obstruction. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2017, 60 patients underwent esophagectomy and gastric conduit reconstruction accompanied by modified laparoscopic FJ. The median observation period, including the period after tube removal, was 644 days. No FJ-associated bowel obstruction, the prevention of which was the primary aim, occurred in any patient. Likewise, no peritonitis or dislodgement occurred. Eight patients (13%) developed a stoma site infection with granulation. The feeding tube became occluded in 11 patients (18%); however, a new feeding tube was reinserted under fluoroscopy for all of these patients. From 2003 to 2012, 13 patients underwent conventional FJ. The median observation period was 387 days. Three patients (23%) developed bowel obstruction by torsion 71 to 134 days after the first surgery, and all were treated by emergency operations. Other FJ-related complications were not different from those in the modified FJ group. CONCLUSION: Our simple, novel technique, the "curtain method," for prevention of laparoscopic FJ-associated bowel obstruction after esophagectomy is a safe additional surgery.

[Neoadjuvant Triplet Combination Chemotherapy(UDON Therapy)in Esophageal Cancer Patients with Impaired Renal Function-A Retrospective Study].

BACKGROUND: In Japan, pre-operative 5-FU and cisplatin(CDDP)(FP)combination therapy has been the standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC)for advanced resectable esophageal cancer(EC); furthermore, the efficacy of the docetaxel (DTX)-containing triplet regimen, FP plus DTX, has been reported. However, patients with impaired renal function should not receive high-dose CDDP. We have been developing a non-CDDP-containing triplet regimen, comprising 5-FU, DTX, and nedaplatin(NED)(UDON), on a phase Ⅰ/Ⅱtrial basis. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of NAC with UDON in advanced EC patients with impaired renal function. METHODS: Five patients with advanced resectable EC with impaired renal function were enrolled in this study. Patients received NAC(5-FU, 640mg/m / 2, days 1-5; DTX, 28 mg/m2, days 1 and 15; and NED, 72mg/m2, day 1, q28, 2 courses); following this, they underwent esophagectomy. The primary endpoint was response rate, and the secondary endpoint was adverse event(AE). RESULTS: The median age was 79 years (range: 58-80 years). The ECOG performance status was 1/2 : 3/2. The main tumor locations were Ce/Ut/Mt : 1/1/3 and the cStages were ⅡA/ⅢA/ⅢC : 1/2/2. The RR(CR/PR/SD/PD : 0/4/1/0)was 80%. The pathological response was grade 1a/1b : 2/3. Major grade 3 or 4 AEs included neutropenia(40%), febrile neutropenia(20%), diarrhea(20%), and hyponatremia( 40%). There was no treatment-related death or reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: NAC with UDON might be feasible and effective in patients with advanced resectable EC with impaired renal function, who are ineligible for high-dose CDDP administration. We are planning a phaseⅡclinical study based on the present results.

Phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with intraperitoneal paclitaxel, S-1, and intravenous cisplatin and paclitaxel for stage IIIA or IIIB gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: We carried out a phase II trial to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprising a single intraperitoneal administration of paclitaxel, followed by intravenous administrations of paclitaxel and cisplatin with S-1 for clinical stage III gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients with potentially resectable gastric cancer were eligible. A laparoscopic survey was performed to confirm CY0 and P0. Intraperitoneal paclitaxel (60 mg/m 2 ) was administered, followed by systemic chemotherapy. Surgery was performed after two cycles of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the response rate of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints were adverse events, pathological response rate, and overall survival rate. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled. Planned cycles were completed in all patients. Grade 3/4 leukopenia and grade 3/4 neutropenia were observed in four (20%) and seven (35%) patients, respectively. The overall response rate was 70% (partial response: 14, stable disease: 5, progressive disease: 1). All patients underwent R0 gastrectomy with D2 lymph-node dissection, with no surgery-related deaths. The pathological response rate was 65% (13 of 20). The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 90.0% and 77.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy including intraperitoneal paclitaxel followed by sequential intravenous paclitaxel and cisplatin with S-1 for resectable advanced gastric cancer is feasible and effective.

Intraperitoneal Administration of Paclitaxel Followed by Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, and S-1 Chemotherapy for Cytology-positive Gastric Cancer: A Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: A preliminary study evaluating the feasibility of single intraperitoneal (IP) administration of paclitaxel followed by paclitaxel and cisplatin with S-1 (PCS) systemic chemotherapy for cytology-positive (CY1) gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Staging laparoscopy was performed to confirm CY1 and P0 status. Initially, patients received IP paclitaxel. Beginning 7 days later PCS was given every 3 weeks followed by second-look laparoscopy. RESULTS: Nine patients were enrolled. The toxic effects of IP and systemic chemotherapy were acceptable. After chemotherapy, 8 patients converted from CY1P0 to CY0P0 and 1 patient from CY1P0 to CY1P1. Gastrectomy was performed on 8 patients except for the CY1P1 patient. Four patients were alive without recurrence. The 2-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 76% and 65%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Combination chemotherapy with IP paclitaxel and sequential PCS is safe and may be effective for CY1 gastric cancer.

Intraperitoneal and Systemic Chemotherapy for Patients with Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis: A Phase II Trial.

AIM: To conduct a phase II study of single intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of paclitaxel followed by paclitaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (PCS) chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (PM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Staging laparotomy was performed to confirm PM. Initially, patients received i.p. paclitaxel. Beginning 7 days later, PCS was given every 3 weeks followed by second-look laparoscopy. Primary and secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS) rate, and response rate and patient safety, respectively. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled. The overall response rate was 70.5% (12/17). Grade 3/4 toxic effects included neutropenia and leukopenia. After chemotherapy, PM disappearance was confirmed in 11 patients. Gastrectomy was eventually performed in 11 patients. The 1-year OS rate was 82.4% and the median survival time was 23.9 months considering the overall cohort. CONCLUSION: Combination chemotherapy with i.p. paclitaxel and PCS is well tolerated and effective in patients with gastric cancer with PM.

Novel esophageal reconstruction technique via transmediastinal route from posterior to anterior mediastinum after esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of metachronous esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) after head and neck cancer (HNC) and in elderly patients has increased. Both elderly ESCC patients and ESCC patients after HNC surgery are at potential risk for dysphagia, and for the latter, surgery in the neck is difficult. An intrathoracic anastomosis that bypasses the cervical procedure is preferable to preserve swallowing function and reduce surgical risk. In gastrectomized patients, because the stomach cannot be used as a substitute, securing graft blood supply is critical, but microvascular anastomosis cannot be easily added in procedures for intrathoracic posterior mediastinal reconstruction. Thus, we have developed a novel technique for esophageal reconstruction in gastrectomized patients who are elderly or who had undergone HNC surgery, enabling concomitant intrathoracic anastomosis and microvascular anastomosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness and safety of this technique. METHODS: The jejunal or ileocolic graft is first pulled up through the anterior mediastinum and is then passed into the right thoracic cavity via a small hole made in the anterior mediastinal pleura. The graft is finally anastomosed with the remnant esophagus in the upper posterior mediastinum. Thereafter, microvascular anastomosis is performed in the retrosternal space. RESULTS: Four patients underwent this new reconstruction procedure with no significant postoperative complications, good swallowing function postoperatively, and no retention of food in the graft. CONCLUSIONS: This novel transmediastinal reconstruction technique is a possible option for highly selected patients to enable intrathoracic anastomosis and the addition of microvascular anastomosis.

[A Case of Advanced Esophageal Cancer Successfully Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Containing 5-FU, Docetaxel. and Nedaplatin Combination Therapy].

A 71-year-old man with a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cerebral infarction was admitted to our hospital with dysphagia. Gastroduodenoscopy, thoracoabdominal CT, and PET-CT findings showed type 2 advanced esophageal cancer( squamous cell carcinoma)with upper mediastinal and cervical lymph node(LN)metastasis: cT3N2M1(LYM #104L), cStage Ⅳ. Two courses of neoadjuvant UDONchemotherapy containing 5-FU(640mg/m / 2, days 1-5), docetaxel(28mg/m2, days 1 and 15), and nedaplatin(72mg/m2, day 1)were administered every 4 weeks. UDONtherapy caused grade(Gr)3 febrile neutropenia, Gr 2 diarrhea, and Gr 1 thrombopenia; the tumor and LNs partially responded to the therapy. After 2 courses of UDONtherapy, esophagectomy with right thoracotomy, 3-field LNdissection, and reconstruction of the gastric tube were performed. The postoperative course was almost uneventful besides recurrent nerve palsy, aspiration, pneumonia, and delirium, and the patient was discharged 60 days after surgery. The pathological diagnosis was ypT0N0M0, ypStage 0, and the histological response of the primary tumor and LNs were evaluated as Gr 3. Neoadjuvant UDON therapy is feasible for elderly patients with advanced esophageal cancer and renal failure or comorbidities, for whom CDDP could not be administered. We are planning a clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of neoadjuvant UDONtherapy.

[A Case of Intestinal Perforation Due to a Catheter for Intraperitoneal Access Port for Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer].

The usefulness of intraperitoneal(IP)chemotherapy for gastric cancer with intraperitoneal metastasis has been examined in some clinical trials. We report a case of intestinal perforation caused by a catheter for IP ports. A 75-year-old man had undergone IP therapy for type 4 gastric cancer. After IP therapy, he underwent total gastrectomy. He had no recurrence for 3 years. He complained of high fever and abdominal pain more than 1 week ago. Based on contrast-enhanced CT, we diagnosed him with peritonitis by intestinal perforation due to the catheter, and on the same day, we removed the catheter and performed intraperitoneal drainage by emergent laparotomy. The tube penetrated the ileum 20 cm from the ileocecal portion. We resected the ileocecal area and damaged intestinal tract and removed the subcutaneous IP port. He was discharged on the 25th postoperative day. IP ports should be removed after the completion of IP chemotherapy because the incidence of perforation by IP ports was reported as 0 to 3.5%in a previous report.

[Techniques for Preventing Postoperative Complication in Esophageal Salvage Surgery].

Patients with esophageal cancer are often treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). Regardless of arrival at dCRT, the risk of local/regional recurrence during follow-up is significant. Many patient are faced with limited options for therapy once dCRT has failed. Salvage surgery is the only way for complete cure of patients with local/regional recurrent esophageal cancer after dCRT. However, salvage surgery has a significant high risk of fatal complications. We examine our preventive measures to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications after salvage surgery for thoracic esophageal cancer. The points of our preventive measures are them; I. the ingenuity of surgery, II. the securement of blood supply for the respiratory tract, III. standard lymphadenectomy, IV. countermeasures of anastomotic failure, V. countermeasures of dead space, VI. countermeasures of respiratory complications, VII. perioperative managements. Salvage surgery is a reasonable option to treat patients with local/regional recurrence after failed dCRT. Our preventive mesures are effective, therefore, we have to make the further technological developments and the safety of salvage surgery.

A case of incisional hernia repair using Composix mesh prosthesis after antethoracic pedicled jejunal flap reconstruction following an esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: An incisional hernia in a case of antethoracic pedicled jejunal flap esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy is a very rare occurrence, and this hernia was distinctive in that the reconstructed jejunum had passed through the hernial orifice; a standard surgical treatment for such a presentation has not been established. Herein, we describe a case of repair using mesh prosthesis for an atypical and distinctive incisional hernia after antethoracic pedicled jejunal flap esophageal reconstruction. CASE PRESENTATION: A 77-year-old woman with a history of subtotal esophagectomy who had undergone antethoracic pedicled jejunal flap reconstruction complained of epigastric prominence and discomfort without pain. On examination, she had an abdominal protrusion between the xiphoid process and the umbilicus that contained the small bowel. Computed tomography showed that the fenestration of the abdominal wall that was intentionally created for jejunum pull-up was dehisced in a region measuring 9 × 15 cm and the small intestine protruded through it into the subcutaneous space without strangulation. Because the hernial orifice was too large and the reconstructed jejunum was passing through the hernial orifice in this case, we applied a parastomal hernia repair method that was modified from the inguinal hernia repair using the Lichtenstein technique. After 3 years and 5 months following surgery, the patient has recovered without hernia recurrence or other complications. CONCLUSION: We consider this to be the first case of repair using Composix mesh prosthesis for repair of an atypical and distinctive incisional hernia after an antethoracic pedicled jejunal flap reconstruction. This method seems to be useful and could potentially be widely adopted as the surgical treatment for this condition.

[A Case of Recurrent Gastric Cancer with Grade 3 Proteinuria Caused by Ramucirumab plus Paclitaxel Therapy].

Proteinuria is one of the characteristic adverse events by ramucirumab(RAM)plus paclitaxel(PTX)combination therapy for advanced gastric cancer. We reported a case of recurrent gastric cancer with grade(gr)3 proteinuria caused by RAM plus PTX therapy. 77-year-old woman was underwent distal gastrectomy in 76 years old for gastric cancer that was diagnosed mucinous adenocarcinoma, fStage III C(T4aN3H0P0CY0M0)and received adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 for 1 year. She suffered from peritoneal recurrence with ascites after 1 year and 4 months of the operation and RAM(8mg/kg; day 1 and 15)plus PTX(80mg/m2; day 1, 8 and 15)therapy was administrated as second-line chemotherapy. After 1 course, weekly PTX has been continued for gr 3 proteinuria and the ascites disappeared after 4 courses. This successful case might indicate that it was important for patients with gr 3 proteinuria as adverse event to consider discontinuance of RAM and continuation of PTX according to the proper usage guide of RAM.

[A Patient with Scirrhous Gastric Cancer Diagnosed and Resected Subsequently by Laparotomy Examination Due to Difficulty to Take Cancer Specimen by Endoscopic Biopsy].

Some of scirrhous gastric cancer are difficult to diagnose on the surface view or to take correct biopsy specimen.A 85-yearold man with dysphagia was diagnosed scirrhous gastric cancer endoscopically, but could not be taken a biopsy specimen showing cancer.We informed cases of scirrhous gastric cancer difficult to take correct biopsy specimen and recommended surgical operation to take correct specimen and to start a treatment.Patient underwent total gastrectomy after cancer diagnosis( P0CY0cT4aN0).He can eat more food and survive longer than 1 year without any chemotherapies.Scirrhous gastric cancer needs early diagnosis and treatment to improve patient prognosis.

[Combination Chemotherapy Including Intraperitoneal(IP)Administration of Paclitaxel(PTX)followed by PTX, CDDP and S-1Triplet Chemotherapy for CY1P0 Gastric Cancer].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of combination chemotherapy including single intraperitoneal( IP)administration of paclitaxel(PTX), followed by triplet chemotherapy(PTX, cisplatin[CDDP]and S-1: PCS)for CY1P0 gastric cancer. METHODS: First of all, we performed staging laparoscopy and confirmed CY1P0, and secondary, administrated PTX intraperitoneally. Thirdly, patients received PCS chemotherapy for 2 courses. After antitumor effect had been confirmed, we performed second look laparoscopy. In the case of CY0P0, we performed gastrectomy with D2 lymph nodes dissection. RESULTS: Total 4 patients were enrolled. Grade 3 leukopenia and neutropenia were observed in one patient while intraperitoneal and systemic-chemotherapy. One patients showed PR and 3 patients showed SD. All patients underwent second look laparoscopy. CY0P0 was observed in all patients and gastrectomy with D2 dissection was performed for all patients. Postoperative complications were observed in 2 patients. Two patients were still alive without recurrence, while the remaining 2 had died of liver metastasis and #16 LN metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Combination chemotherapy including single IP PTX followed by PCS systemic-chemotherapy for CY1P0 gastric cancer is feasible and efficient.

[Resection of the Distal Part of the Gastric Tube for the Gastric Tube Cancer after Esophagectomy - A Case Report].

A 76-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for treatment of gastric tube cancer(cT2N0M0, cStage II A)detected by a screening upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Seven years previously, he had undergone subtotal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with gastric pull-up via the retrosternal route. At that time, he experienced cardiopulmonary arrest due to ventric- ular tachycardia. He was in a state of poor nutrition(BMI 15 kg/m2). Therefore, reducing operative stress as much as possible, minimizing complications after surgery, and aiming for a satisfactory postoperative course are all important goals. Based on his past history, we performed distal gastrectomy(resection of the distal part of the gastric tube)without excision of the right gastroepiploic artery. The postoperative course was uneventful. He was discharged 40 days after surgery. By considering the risks of surgery due to cardiac dysfunction and malnutrition, we were able to provide effective and safe therapy for the patient.

[A Case of Locally Advanced Thoracic Esophageal Cancer with Larynx Preservation and Curative Resection via Combined Modality Therapy].

Prognosis of locally advanced esophageal cancer is poor. The greatest prognostic factor of locally advanced esophageal cancer is a local control. We experienced a case of T4 locally advanced thoracic esophageal cancer who was successfully resected without any combined resection after multimodality therapy. A male in 75-year-old. was diagnosed with type 3 locally advanced upper thoracic esophageal cancer whose metastatic right recurrent laryngeal lymph node invaded into the trachea. Definitive chemoradiation therapy(CRT)was performed, leading to a significant shrinkage of the main tumor, but T4 lesion remained. Next, adding DCF therapy(docetaxel, CDDP and 5-FU), a relief of T4 was finally obtained. Then, salvage surgery with subtotalesophagectomy and retrosternalesophagealreconstruction with gastric tube was performed, resulting in R0 resection without any combined resection. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient has been alive without recurrence for 1 year after surgery. In locally advanced cancer, focusing on T4 downstaging, it is significantly important in terms of safety, curativity and organ preservation to perform surgery after a sure sign of T4 relief by multimodality therapy.