G146V mutation at the hinge region of actin reveals a myosin class-specific requirement of actin conformations for motility.

The G146V mutation in actin is dominant lethal in yeast. G146V actin filaments bind cofilin only minimally, presumably because cofilin binding requires the large and small actin domains to twist with respect to one another around the hinge region containing Gly-146, and the mutation inhibits that twisting motion. A number of studies have suggested that force generation by myosin also requires actin filaments to undergo conformational changes. This prompted us to examine the effects of the G146V mutation on myosin motility. When compared with wild-type actin filaments, G146V filaments showed a 78% slower gliding velocity and a 70% smaller stall force on surfaces coated with skeletal heavy meromyosin. In contrast, the G146V mutation had no effect on either gliding velocity or stall force on myosin V surfaces. Kinetic analyses of actin-myosin binding and ATPase activity indicated that the weaker affinity of actin filaments for myosin heads carrying ADP, as well as reduced actin-activated ATPase activity, are the cause of the diminished motility seen with skeletal myosin. Interestingly, the G146V mutation disrupted cooperative binding of myosin II heads to actin filaments. These data suggest that myosin-induced conformational changes in the actin filaments, presumably around the hinge region, are involved in mediating the motility of skeletal myosin but not myosin V and that the specific structural requirements for the actin subunits, and thus the mechanism of motility, differ among myosin classes.

Simultaneous measurement of nucleotide occupancy and mechanical displacement in myosin-V, a processive molecular motor.

Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) turnover drives various processive molecular motors and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) release is a principal transition in this cycle. Biochemical and single molecule mechanical studies have led to a model in which a slow ADP release step contributes to the processivity of myosin-V. To test the relationship between force generation and ADP release, we utilized optical trapping nanometry and single molecule total internal reflection fluorescence imaging for simultaneous and direct observation of both processes in myosin-V. We found that ADP was released 69 +/- 5.3 ms after force generation and displacement of actin, providing direct evidence for slow ADP release. As proposed by several previous studies, this slow ADP release probably ensures processivity by prolonging the strong actomyosin state in the ATP turnover cycle.

Measurement system for simultaneous observation of myosin V chemical and mechanical events.

Myosin V is an actin-based processive molecular motor driven by the chemical energy of ATP hydrolysis. Although the chemo-mechanical coupling in processive movement has been postulated by separate structural, mechanical and biochemical studies, no experiment has been able to directly test these conclusions. Therefore the relationship between ATP-turnover and force generation remains unclear. Currently, the most direct method to measure the chemo-mechanical coupling in processive motors is to simultaneously observe ATP-turnover cycles and displacement at the single molecule level. In this study, we developed a simultaneous measurement system suitable for mechanical and chemical assays of myosin V in order to directly elucidate its chemo-mechanical coupling.

Biased Brownian motion mechanism for processivity and directionality of single-headed myosin-VI.

Conventional form to function as a vesicle transporter is not a 'single molecule' but a coordinated 'two molecules'. The coordinated two molecules make it complicated to reveal its mechanism. To overcome the difficulty, we adopted a single-headed myosin-VI as a model protein. Myosin-VI is an intracellular vesicle and organelle transporter that moves along actin filaments in a direction opposite to most other known myosin classes. The myosin-VI was expected to form a dimer to move processively along actin filaments with a hand-over-hand mechanism like other myosin organelle transporters. However, wild-type myosin-VI was demonstrated to be monomer and single-headed, casting doubt on its processivity. Using single molecule techniques, we show that green fluorescent protein (GFP)-fused single-headed myosin-VI does not move processively. However, when coupled to a 200 nm polystyrene bead (comparable to an intracellular vesicle in size) at a ratio of one head per bead, single-headed myosin-VI moves processively with large (40 nm) steps. Furthermore, we found that a single-headed myosin-VI-bead complex moved more processively in a high-viscous solution (40-fold higher than water) similar to cellular environment. Because diffusion of the bead is 60-fold slower than myosin-VI heads alone in water, we propose a model in which the bead acts as a diffusional anchor for the myosin-VI, enhancing the head's rebinding following detachment and supporting processive movement of the bead-monomer complex. This investigation will help us understand how molecular motors utilize Brownian motion in cells.

Single molecule FRET for the study on structural dynamics of biomolecules.

Single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) is the technique that has been developed by combining FRET measurement and single molecule fluorescence imaging. This technique allows us to measure the dynamic changes of the interaction and structures of biomolecules. In this study, the validity of the method was tested using fluorescence dyes on double stranded DNA molecules as a rigid spacer. FRET signals from double stranded DNA molecules were stable and their average FRET values provided the distance between the donor and acceptor in agreement with B-DNA type helix model. Next, the single molecule FRET method was applied to the studies on the dynamic structure of Ras, a signaling protein. The data showed that Ras has multiple conformational states and undergoes transition between them. This study on the dynamic conformation of Ras provided a clue for understanding the molecular mechanism of cell signaling switches.

The diffusive search mechanism of processive myosin class-V motor involves directional steps along actin subunits.

It is widely accepted that the vesicle-transporter myosin-V moves processively along F-actin with large steps of approximately 36 nm using a hand-over-hand mechanism. A key question is how does the rear head of two-headed myosin-V search for the forward actin target in the forward direction. Scanning probe nanometry was used to resolve this underlying search process, which was made possible by attaching the head to a relatively large probe. One-headed myosin-V undergoes directional diffusion with approximately 5.5 nm substeps to develop an average displacement of approximately 20 nm, which was independent of the neck length (2IQ and 6IQ motifs). Two-headed myosin-V showed several approximately 5.5 nm substeps within each processive approximately 36 nm step. These results suggest that the myosin-V head searches in the forward direction for the actin target using directional diffusion on the actin subunits according to a potential slope created along the actin helix.

Grafting of poly(ethylene glycol) onto poly(acrylic acid)-coated glass for a protein-resistant surface.

The surface of solid glass supports for samples in optical microscopy and for biosensors needs to be protein-resistant. A coating of a poly(ethylene glycol) monomethyl ether (mPEG) on the surface of the glass is one promising method for preventing the nonspecific adsorption of proteins. In this study, we have developed a novel technique for achieving an optimal coverage of a glass surface with mPEG to prevent protein adhesion. A clean glass substrate previously treated with (3-aminopropyl)dimethylethoxysilane (APDMES) was treated sequentially with poly(acrylic acid) and subsequently a primary amine derivative of mPEG in the presence of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide. The resultant glass surface was demonstrated to be highly protein-resistant, and the adsorption of bovine serum albumin decreased to only a few percentage points of that on a glass surface treated with APDMES alone. Furthermore, to extend the present method, we also prepared a glass substrate on which biotinylated poly(ethylene glycol) was cografted with mPEG, and biotinylated myosin subfragment-1 (biotin-S1) was subsequently immobilized on this substrate by biotin/avidin chemistry. Actin filaments were observed to glide on the biotin-S1-coated glass surface in the presence of ATP, and thus, the method is capable of immobilizing the protein specifically without any loss in its biological function.

A unique mechanism for the processive movement of single-headed myosin-IX.

It has been puzzled that in spite of its single-headed structure, myosin-IX shows the typical character of processive motor in multi-molecule in vitro motility assay, because this cannot be explained by hand-over-hand mechanism of the two-headed processive myosins. Here, we show direct evidence of the processive movement of myosin-IX using two different single molecule techniques. Using optical trap nanometry, we found that myosin-IX takes several large ( approximately 20nm) steps before detaching from an actin filament. Furthermore, we directly visualized the single myosin-IX molecules moving on actin filaments for several hundred nanometers without dissociating from actin filament. Since myosin-IX processively moves without anchoring the neck domain, the result suggests that the neck tilting is not involved for the processive movement of myosin-IX. We propose that the myosin-IX head moves processively along an actin filament like an inchworm via a unique long and positively charged insertion in the loop 2 region of the head.

Dynamic polymorphism of Ras observed by single molecule FRET is the basis for molecular recognition.

Ras regulates signal transduction pathway function by dynamically interacting with various effectors. To understand the basis for Ras function, its conformational dynamics were measured in the absence and presence of effectors using single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between probes located on the Switch II region and GTP. The time trajectories of FRET efficiency from GTP-bound Ras showed that this conformation spontaneously varies among multiple states. Among them, a low FRET state was identified as an inactive state. The transition involving the inactive conformational state occurred in the time range of seconds. In contrast, fluctuation occurring most probably between multiple active high FRET conformational states lasted approximately 30 ms but converged to a specific conformational state upon binding to an effector. Thus, Ras conformation spontaneously fluctuates to readily interact with various effectors.

Cargo-binding makes a wild-type single-headed myosin-VI move processively.

Class VI myosin is an intracellular vesicle and organelle transporter that moves along actin filaments in a direction opposite to most other known myosin classes. The myosin-VI was expected to form a dimer to move processively along actin filaments with a hand-over-hand mechanism like other myosin organelle transporters. Recently, however, wild-type myosin-VI was demonstrated to be monomer and single-headed, casting a doubt on its processivity. By using single molecule techniques, we show that green-fluorescent-protein-tagged single-headed, wild-type myosin-VI does not move processively. However, when coupled to 200-nm polystyrene beads (comparable to intracellular vesicles in size) at a ratio of one head per bead, single-headed myosin-VI moves processively with large (40-nm) steps. The characteristics of this monomer-driven movement were different to that of artificial dimer-driven movement: Compared to the artificial dimer, the monomer-bead complex had a reduced stall force (1 pN compared to 2 pN), an average run length 2.5-fold shorter (91 nm compared to 220 nm) and load-dependent step size. Furthermore, we found that a monomer-bead complex moved more processively in a high viscous solution (40-fold higher than water) similar to cellular environment. Because the diffusion constant of the bead is 60-fold lower than myosin-VI heads alone in water, we propose a model in which the bead acts as a diffusional anchor for the myosin-VI, enhancing its rebinding following detachment and supporting processive movement of the bead-monomer complexes. Although a single-headed myosin-VI was able to move processively with a large cargo, the travel distance was rather short. Multiple molecules may be involved in the cargo transport for a long travel distance in cells.

Mechanism of muscle contraction based on stochastic properties of single actomyosin motors observed in vitro.

We have previously measured the process of displacement generation by a single head of muscle myosin (S1) using scanning probe nanometry. Given that the myosin head was rigidly attached to a fairly large scanning probe, it was assumed to stably interact with an underlying actin filament without diffusing away as would be the case in muscle. The myosin head has been shown to step back and forth stochastically along an actin filament with actin monomer repeats of 5.5 nm and to produce a net movement in the forward direction. The myosin head underwent 5 forward steps to produce a maximum displacement of 30 nm per ATP at low load (<1 pN). Here, we measured the steps over a wide range of forces up to 4 pN. The size of the steps (∼5.5 nm) did not change as the load increased whereas the number of steps per displacement and the stepping rate both decreased. The rate of the 5.5-nm steps at various force levels produced a force-velocity curve of individual actomyosin motors. The force-velocity curve from the individual myosin heads was comparable to that reported in muscle, suggesting that the fundamental mechanical properties in muscle are basically due to the intrinsic stochastic nature of individual actomyosin motors. In order to explain multiple stochastic steps, we propose a model arguing that the thermally-driven step of a myosin head is biased in the forward direction by a potential slope along the actin helical pitch resulting from steric compatibility between the binding sites of actin and a myosin head. Furthermore, computer simulations show that multiple cooperating heads undergoing stochastic steps generate a long (>60 nm) sliding distance per ATP between actin and myosin filaments, i.e., the movement is loosely coupled to the ATPase cycle as observed in muscle.

Unconstrained steps of myosin VI appear longest among known molecular motors.

Myosin VI is a two-headed molecular motor that moves along an actin filament in the direction opposite to most other myosins. Previously, a single myosin VI molecule has been shown to proceed with steps that are large compared to its neck size: either it walks by somehow extending its neck or one head slides along actin for a long distance before the other head lands. To inquire into these and other possible mechanism of motility, we suspended an actin filament between two plastic beads, and let a single myosin VI molecule carrying a bead duplex move along the actin. This configuration, unlike previous studies, allows unconstrained rotation of myosin VI around the right-handed double helix of actin. Myosin VI moved almost straight or as a right-handed spiral with a pitch of several micrometers, indicating that the molecule walks with strides slightly longer than the actin helical repeat of 36 nm. The large steps without much rotation suggest kinesin-type walking with extended and flexible necks, but how to move forward with flexible necks, even under a backward load, is not clear. As an answer, we propose that a conformational change in the lifted head would facilitate landing on a forward, rather than backward, site. This mechanism may underlie stepping of all two-headed molecular motors including kinesin and myosin V.

A one-headed class V myosin molecule develops multiple large (approximately 32-nm) steps successively.

Class V myosin (myosin-V) was first found as a processive motor that moves along an actin filament with large ( approximately 36-nm) successive steps and plays an important role in cargo transport in cells. Subsequently, several other myosins have also been found to move processively. Because myosin-V has two heads with ATP- and actin-binding sites, the mechanism of successive movement has been generally explained based on the two-headed structure. However, the fundamental problem of whether the two-headed structure is essential for the successive movement has not been solved. Here, we measure motility of engineered myosin-V having only one head by optical trapping nanometry. The results show that a single one-headed myosin-V undergoes multiple successive large (approximately 32-nm) steps, suggesting that a novel mechanism is operating for successive myosin movement.

The motor domain determines the large step of myosin-V.

Class-V myosin proceeds along actin filaments with large ( approximately 36 nm) steps. Myosin-V has two heads, each of which consists of a motor domain and a long (23 nm) neck domain. In accordance with the widely accepted lever-arm model, it was suggested that myosin-V steps to successive (36 nm) target zones along the actin helical repeat by tilting its long neck (lever-arm). To test this hypothesis, we measured the mechanical properties of single molecules of myosin-V truncation mutants with neck domains only one-sixth of the native length. Our results show that the processivity and step distance along actin are both similar to those of full-length myosin-V. Thus, the long neck domain is not essential for either the large steps or processivity of myosin-V. These results challenge the lever-arm model. We propose that the motor domain and/or the actomyosin interface enable myosin-V to produce large processive steps during translocation along actin.