Passive tick surveillance and detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in ticks from companion animals in British Columbia: 2018 to 2020.

Objective: The present study was designed to identify tick species and determine prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi infection in ticks obtained from companion animals in British Columbia. Animals and samples: Ticks were submitted by British Columbia veterinarians from client-owned companion animals over a 31-month period. Procedure: Each tick was identified and PCR testing for B. burgdorferi undertaken on all Ixodes species identified by the Zoonotic Diseases and Emerging Pathogens Section of British Columbia Centre for Disease Control Public Health Laboratory (BCCDC PHL). Results: Overall, 85% (n = 300) of ticks submitted were Ixodes spp., with the majority known to transmit B. burgdorferi. Furthermore, 0.8% (95% confidence interval: 0.094 to 2.78%) of these ticks were PCR-positive for B. burgdorferi. Conclusion and clinical relevance: Although the B. burgdorferi positivity rate in this study was low, it remains important for veterinary professionals to inform pet owners that ticks are present and can pose a risk to pets and humans. In eastern North America, B. burgdorferi infection risk has increased rapidly, underscoring the importance of ongoing surveillance in British Columbia to understand current and future distributions of ticks and tick-borne pathogens, especially in the context of climate change.

Surveillance passive des tiques et détection de Borrelia burgdorferi chez des tiques provenant d'animaux de compagnie en Colombie-Britannique: 2018 à 2020. Objectif: Cette étude a été élaboré afin d'identifier les espèces de tiques et de déterminer la prévalence de l'infection à Borrelia burgdorferi chez des tiques obtenues d'animaux de compagnie en Colombie-Britannique. Animaux et échantillons: Les tiques ont été soumises par des médecins vétérinaires de la Colombie-Britannique obtenues d'animaux de compagnie de clients sur une période de 31 mois. Procédure: Chaque tique a été identifiée et un test PCR pour détecter B. burdorferi réalisé sur toutes les espèces Ixodes identifiées par la Section des maladies zoonotiques et des agents pathogènes émergents du Centre for Disease Control Public Health Laboratory de la Colombie-Britannique. Résultats: Au total, 85 % (n = 300) des tiques soumises étaient des Ixodes spp., dont la majorité reconnue pour transmettre B. burgdorferi. De plus, 0,8 % (intervalle de confiance 95 %: 0,094 à 2,78 %) de ces tiques étaient positives pour B. burgdorferi par PCR. Conclusion et signification clinique: Bien que le taux de positivité pour B. burgdorferi dans la présente étude soit faible, il n'en demeure pas moins important pour les professionnels vétérinaires d'informer les propriétaires d'animaux de compagnie que les tiques sont présentes et peuvent représenter un risque pour les animaux de compagnie et les humains. Dans le nord de l'Amérique du Nord, le risque d'infection par B. burgdorferi a augmenté rapidement, soulignant l'importance d'une surveillance continue en Colombie-Britannique pour comprendre la distribution actuelle et future des tiques et agents pathogènes transmis par les tiques, spécialement dans le contexte des changements climatiques.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).

A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NARRATIVE SYNTHESIS OF THE USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR THE SURVEILLANCE OF AVIAN INFLUENZA VIRUSES IN WILD WATERBIRDS.

Wild waterbirds are reservoir hosts for avian influenza viruses (AIV), which can cause devastating outbreaks in multiple species, making them a focus for surveillance efforts. Traditional AIV surveillance involves direct sampling of live or dead birds, but environmental substrates present an alternative sample for surveillance. Environmental sampling analyzes AIV excreted by waterbirds into the environment and complements direct bird sampling by minimizing financial, logistic, permitting, and spatial-temporal constraints associated with traditional surveillance. Our objectives were to synthesize the literature on environmental AIV surveillance, to compare and contrast the different sample types, and to identify key themes and recommendations to aid in the implementation of AIV surveillance using environmental samples. The four main environmental substrates for AIV surveillance are feces, feathers, water, and sediment or soil. Feces were the most common environmental substrate collected. The laboratory analysis of water and sediment provided challenges, such as low AIV concentration, heterogenous AIV distribution, or presence of PCR inhibitors. There are a number of abiotic and biotic environmental factors, including temperature, pH, salinity, or presence of filter feeders, that can influence the presence and persistence of AIV in environmental substrates; however, the nature of this influence is poorly understood in field settings, and field data from southern, coastal, and tropical ecosystems are underrepresented. Similarly, there are few studies comparing the performance of environmental samples to each other and to samples collected in wild waterbirds, and environmental surveillance workflows have yet to be validated or optimized. Environmental samples, particularly when used in combination with new technology such as environmental DNA and next generation sequencing, provided information on trends in AIV detection rates and circulating subtypes that complemented traditional, direct waterbird sampling. The use of environmental samples for AIV surveillance also shows significant promise for programs whose goal is early warning of high-risk subtypes.