RESUMO
Background: The cardiovascular sequelae by the SARS-COV-2 infection is prevalent in a significant portion of the recovered patients from the acute presentation of the SARS-COV-2. Actually, the clinic cardiac control of the post-acute COVID syndrome has been working out without a well-established protocol, making the appropriate diagnosis of the cardiac diseases produced by the different damage mechanisms from COVID-19. Objectives: Standardize cardiovascular care and the follow up of COVID-19 survivors in the function on disease severity and identify patients who develop SPC-19A for timely care. Materials and methods: Through an extensive bibliographic review, this article has the purpose of provide the necessary information to make possible the early diagnosis and following of the cardiac complications that has been recorded trough the months after the acute disease from COVID-19.
Antecedentes: Las secuelas cardiovasculares ocasionadas por la enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) son frecuentes en una importante proporción de los pacientes recuperados del cuadro agudo de la enfermedad. Hasta el día de hoy el seguimiento cardiológico del síndrome agudo post-COVID-19 (SPC-19A) se ha realizado de forma heterogénea y sin directrices que permitan al clínico identificar oportunamente los cambios que preceden a enfermedades cardiológicas derivadas de los distintos mecanismos de daño inducidos por COVID-19. Objetivos: Estandarizar la atención y seguimiento cardiovascular de los supervivientes de COVID-19 en función de la gravedad de la enfermedad e identificar a los pacientes que desarrollen SPC-19A para su atención oportuna. Material y métodos: Mediante una revisión extensa de bibliografía, este documento tiene la intención de unificar y proporcionar la información necesaria para diagnosticar y dar seguimiento a las complicaciones cardiacas que se han documentado en los meses posteriores a la resolución de la COVID-19 aguda.
RESUMO
The present study aimed to compare echocardiography measurements of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) thickness and other risk factors regarding their ability to predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Outcomes of 107 patients (86 males, 21 females, mean age 63.6 years old) submitted to diagnostic echocardiography and coronary angiography were prospectively analyzed. EAT (measures over the right ventricle, interventricular groove and complete bulk of EAT) and left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) were performed by echocardiography. Coronary complexity was evaluated by Syntax score. Primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE's), composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, intra-stent re-stenosis and episodes of decompensate heart failure requiring hospital attention during a mean follow up of 15.94 ± 3.6 months. Mean EAT thickness was 4.6 ± 1.9 mm; and correlated with Syntax score and body mass index; negatively correlated with LVEF. Twenty-three cases of MACE's were recorded during follow up, who showed higher EAT. Diagnostic ability of EAT to discriminate MACE's was comparable to LVEF (AUROC > 0.5); but higher than Syntax score. Quartile comparison of EAT revealed that measurement of the complete bulk of EAT provided a better discrimination range for MACE's, and higher, more significant adjusted risk (cutoff 4.6 mm, RR = 3.91; 95% CI 1.01-15.08; p = 0.04) than the other risk factors. We concluded that echocardiographic measurement of EAT showed higher predicting ability for MACE's than the other markers tested, in patients with CAD. Whether location for echocardiographic measurement of EAT impacts the diagnostic performance of this method deserves further study.
