RESUMO
The Early Literacy Screener (ELS) is a brief screen for emergent literacy delays in 4- and 5-year-olds. Standard developmental screens may also flag these children. What is the value of adding the ELS? Parents of children aged 4 (n = 45) and 5 (n = 26) years completed the Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3 (ASQ-3), the Survey of Well-Being in Young Children (SWYC), and the ELS. Rates of positive agreement (PA), negative agreement (NA), and overall agreement (Cohen's κ) across the various screening tools were calculated. Early literacy delays were detected in 51% of those who passed the ASQ and 38% of those who passed the SWYC. For ELS versus ASQ, κ = 0.18, PA = 0.36 (95% CI = 0.23-0.51), and NA = 0.83 (95% CI = 0.66-0.92). For ELS versus SWYC, κ = 0.42, PA = 0.61 (95% CI = 0.45-0.75), and NA = 0.82 (95% CI = 0.65-0.92). The ELS adds value by flagging early literacy delays in many children who pass either the ASQ-3 or SWYC.
Assuntos
Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/diagnóstico , Alfabetização/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Desenvolvimento Infantil , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , PsicometriaAssuntos
Dislexia/diagnóstico , Pais , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To develop a brief tool for screening of emergent literacy skills in preschool children (3-5 years old) in pediatric clinics. METHODS: Parents were given an 8-item questionnaire, and the children were tested with the Get Ready to Read-Revised (GRTR-R) screener. With the GRTR-R score as gold standard, the parent questionnaire was optimized using various combinations of questions and response weights in one half of the sample. The resulting 5-item questionnaire was then validated using the other half of the sample. RESULTS: A total of 203 patients were enrolled. In the validation sample, the 5-item questionnaire had sensitivity and specificity vis-à-vis the GRTR-R of 100% and 78.6% in 5-year-olds (cutoff score of 8) and 78.6% and 68.2% in 4-year-olds (cutoff of 6). The questionnaire did not perform well in 3-year-olds. CONCLUSION: A very brief parent questionnaire may be useful as a first-line screener for early reading problems.
