RESUMO
Background: Irritable bowel syndrome is a heterogeneous syndrome and it is difficult to find an effective treatment. Previously, a starch- and sucrose-reduced diet (SSRD) demonstrated promising short-term outcomes. It was proposed that genetic variants in the sucrose-isomaltase gene might influence this success. Our aim in this work was to extend the follow-up study to 1 year and to analyse the effect of the genetic variants of genes involved in starch and sucrose metabolism. Methods: IBS-SSS questionnaire, IBS-QoL questionnaire and questionnaires about adherence, difficulty and food assessment were sent to 34 patients after 6 months and 1 year after the end of the dietary intervention. In addition, 11 genes involved in sucrose and starch metabolism were sequenced. Results: Twenty-three participants responded to the 6 months follow-up and 16 to the 1 year follow-up. IBS-SSS total value increased 59.71% in the 6 months follow-up compared with the end of the intervention (p = 0.0018), and 55.39% in the 1 year follow-up (p = 0.0166); while IBS-QoL score decreased 24.09% (p = 0.0002) and 18.07% (p = 0.0022), respectively. The adherence decreased by 29.11% (p = 4.8 × 10-5) and 27.21% (p = 0.0054), respectively. In addition, carriers of pathogenic variants on the SI gene showed a slightly better performance than non-carriers. Finally, the participants showed less satisfaction over time with 18 allowed foods in the diet. Conclusion: Over time the SSRD is difficult to follow and the genotype might affect the performance of the diet. Since this diet could be a promising therapeutic option, a larger cohort needs to be analysed to validate the results and to compare it with other diets.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Data for Spain from the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study on the disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) were used to assess the national and regional prevalence of all 22 DGBI, the percentage of respondents meeting diagnostic criteria for at least one DGBI, and the impact on burden of disease in our country. METHODS: Data were collected through an anonymous, nationwide, and secure Internet survey with multiple built-in quality-assurance techniques that included the Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire and an in-depth supplemental questionnaire. KEY RESULTS: The survey was completed by 2072 adult Spanish participants (50.2% female) with a mean age of 45.67 ± 15.44 years with a good representative national distribution. 43.6% (41.5%-45.8%) met diagnostic criteria for at least one DGBI, with 8.2% for any esophageal disorder, 12.1% for any gastroduodenal disorder, 30.1% for any bowel disorder, and 11.5% for any anorectal disorder. Functional constipation was the most prevalent DGBI in Spain (12.8%). We found that proctalgia fugax (9.3%), unspecified bowel disorders (10.8%), and functional dysphagia (5.6%) showed unexplained high rates in our country. DGBI rates were higher for women. Having any DGBI was negatively associated with psychosocial variables (including quality of life, somatization, and concern about digestive problems), and associated with increased healthcare utilization. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: We provide the first comprehensive data on the prevalence and burden of all DGBI in Spain using the Rome IV criteria. The enormous burden of DGBI in Spain highlights the need for specialized training and future research.
