Displasia evolutiva de caderas: más allá del cribado. La exploración, nuestra asignatura pendiente / Develomental dysplasia of the hip: beyond the screening. Physical exam is our pending subject

Introducción: La displasia del desarrollo de la cadera se trata de una patología relativamente frecuente y es una causa importante de discapacidad si no se trata de la forma adecuada. Existen una serie de factores de riesgo que aumentan la probabilidad de presentar una displasia de caderas, pero la mayoría de los afectados no los presentan. Por ello, la exploración física es fundamental para su diagnóstico. No obstante, el número de ecografías solicitadas parece ser muy superior al que sería necesario, según los hallazgos clínicos.Material y métodos: Estudio observacional descriptivo retrospectivo de los recién nacidos pertenecientes al área de referencia de un hospital terciario. Se recogieron las ecografías de caderas realizadas en nuestro centro durante el periodo de estudio, así como los diagnósticos de displasia durante dicho periodo para comprobar la frecuencia de presentación de los factores de riesgo y los hallazgos clínicos, además del número de ecografías solicitadas en este periodo y su rendimiento.Resultados: Se incluyeron un total de 456 recién nacidos a los que se realizaron un total de 530 ecografías de caderas. Tres de las 12 displasias detectadas en este tiempo presentaban factores de riesgo, el resto de los pacientes fue diagnosticado por la clínica.Conclusiones: Los protocolos de screening son implementados de forma adecuada en nuestro medio, aunque sin la exploración física detallada no sería posible la detección precoz de la displasia, evitando con ello secuelas a largo plazo. No obstante, el número de ecografías de caderas solicitadas es muy superior al que se esperaría, dado el bajo porcentaje de displasias halladas. (AU)

Introduction: Developmental dysplasia of the hip is a common cause of disability among children. Early detection leads to better prognosis. There are some risk factors that increase the possibility of developing a dysplasia. But not every child with developmental dysplasia has them. This means that physical examination is still very useful to detect them. However, based on clinical findings, the amount of requested ultrasound seems higher than it would be necessary. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of infants born in a single tertiary care centre. Babies in which hip ultrasound was performed were included. During the period of study, patients with diagnosis of developmental hip dysplasia were also included, as well as the amount of ultrasounds requested during this period, and their efficiency. Results: Out of the 456 new-borns included, 530 hip ultrasounds were performed. Just 3 of the total 12 dysplasias had risk factors. The others were diagnosed through clinical examination. Conclusions: Screening protocols are useful to detect hip dysplasia but clinical examination is very important to detect those cases without risk factors. However, the number of tests is higher than expected according to the diagnosed dysplasias. (AU)

Developmental dysplasia of the hip: Beyond the screening. Physical exam is our pending subject.

INTRODUCTION: Developmental dysplasia of the hip is a common cause of disability among children. Early detection leads to better prognosis. There are some risk factors that increase the possibility of developing a dysplasia. But not every child with developmental dysplasia has them. This means that physical examination is still very useful to detect them. However, based on clinical findings, the amount of requested ultrasound seems higher than it would be necessary. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of infants born in a single tertiary care centre. Babies in which hip ultrasound was performed were included. During the period of study, patients with diagnosis of developmental hip dysplasia were also included, as well as the amount of ultrasounds requested during this period, and their efficiency. RESULTS: Out of the 456 newborns included, 530 hip ultrasounds were performed. Just 3 of the total 12 dysplasias had risk factors. The others were diagnosed through clinical examination. CONCLUSIONS: Screening protocols are useful to detect hip dysplasia but clinical examination is very important to detect those cases without risk factors. However, the number of tests is higher than expected according to the diagnosed dysplasias.

[Develomental dysplasia of the hip: beyond the screening. Physical exam is our pending subject]. / Displasia evolutiva de caderas: más allá del cribado. La exploración, nuestra asignatura pendiente.

INTRODUCTION: Developmental dysplasia of the hip is a common cause of disability among children. Early detection leads to better prognosis. There are some risk factors that increase the possibility of developing a dysplasia. But not every child with developmental dysplasia has them. This means that physical examination is still very useful to detect them. However, based on clinical findings, the amount of requested ultrasound seems higher than it would be necessary. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of infants born in a single tertiary care centre. Babies in which hip ultrasound was performed were included. During the period of study, patients with diagnosis of developmental hip dysplasia were also included, as well as the amount of ultrasounds requested during this period, and their efficiency. RESULTS: Out of the 456 new-borns included, 530 hip ultrasounds were performed. Just 3 of the total 12 dysplasias had risk factors. The others were diagnosed through clinical examination. CONCLUSIONS: Screening protocols are useful to detect hip dysplasia but clinical examination is very important to detect those cases without risk factors. However, the number of tests is higher than expected according to the diagnosed dysplasias.

Observación clínica de recién nacidos con factores de riesgo infeccioso, una práctica segura / Clinical observation of newborns with infection risk: A safe practice

INTRODUCCIÓN: La sepsis vertical precoz es una causa importante de morbimortalidad neonatal. La evidencia científica apunta a que la mayoría de los recién nacidos infectados presentan clínica en las primeras horas de vida. Tras la aplicación de las medidas para la prevención de sepsis vertical y el descenso en su incidencia, se han propuesto cambios en el manejo de estos niños. No obstante, la realización de exploraciones complementarias dolorosas aún sigue siendo una práctica muy extendida. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo realizado entre 2011 y 2015. Se incluyó a todos los recién nacidos con edad gestacional ≥ 35 semanas, asintomáticos al nacimiento que presentaban uno o más factores de riesgo infeccioso. Durante su estancia en maternidad se realiza observación clínica periódica para la detección de síntomas compatibles con infección. RESULTADOS: De los 9.424 recién nacidos en este periodo, 1.425 cumplían los criterios de inclusión del estudio; 53 pacientes precisaron ingreso, la mitad de ellos por sospecha de infección, confirmándose finalmente solo en 7 este diagnóstico. Todos los pacientes presentaron clínica en las primeras 72 h de vida. CONCLUSIONES: Los niños con factores de riesgo infeccioso que desarrollan una infección presentan clínica de forma precoz en las primeras horas tras el nacimiento. Este trabajo apoya la observación clínica estrecha como medida suficiente y segura para la detección de la sepsis neonatal precoz

INTRODUCTION: Early-onset neonatal sepsis refers to an infection which starts during the first 72 hours of birth, and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Scientific evidence shows that infected infants present with symptoms during the first hours after delivery. There has been a significant decrease in this condition with the implementation of guidelines for its prevention. However, International guidelines still recommend the evaluation of these infants using painful tests. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted on all asymptomatic infants born at > 35 weeks gestation with one or more risk factors in a single tertiary care centre from 2011 to 2015. They were periodically observed in newborn nursery from admission until discharge looking for signs of infection. RESULTS: Out of the 9,424 babies born during this period, 1425 were included in the study. A total of 53 infants were admitted to the neonatal unit, half of them because of sepsis suspicion. Finally, just 7 were discharged with the diagnosis of sepsis. All these 7 presented with symptoms during their first 72 hours of life. No sepsis was reported in asymptomatic infants. CONCLUSIONS: Truly infected infants present with symptoms during their first hours of life. This study supports the observation of infants at risk as a safe practice to detect early-onset sepsis

[Clinical observation of newborns with infection risk: A safe practice]. / Observación clínica de recién nacidos con factores de riesgo infeccioso, una práctica segura.

INTRODUCTION: Early-onset neonatal sepsis refers to an infection which starts during the first 72hours of birth, and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Scientific evidence shows that infected infants present with symptoms during the first hours after delivery. There has been a significant decrease in this condition with the implementation of guidelines for its prevention. However, International guidelines still recommend the evaluation of these infants using painful tests. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted on all asymptomatic infants born at>35 weeks gestation with one or more risk factors in a single tertiary care centre from 2011 to 2015. They were periodically observed in newborn nursery from admission until discharge looking for signs of infection. RESULTS: Out of the 9,424 babies born during this period, 1425 were included in the study. A total of 53 infants were admitted to the neonatal unit, half of them because of sepsis suspicion. Finally, just 7 were discharged with the diagnosis of sepsis. All these 7 presented with symptoms during their first 72hours of life. No sepsis was reported in asymptomatic infants. CONCLUSIONS: Truly infected infants present with symptoms during their first hours of life. This study supports the observation of infants at risk as a safe practice to detect early-onset sepsis.