Continuous lateral rotational therapy in thoracic trauma--A matched pair analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Given the lack of reliable evidence on the utility of continuous lateral rotational therapy (CLRT) in chest trauma, we performed a single-centre retrospective matched-pair analysis of patients treated either with CLRT or non-continuous manual turning after blunt thoracic trauma. METHODS: We included adult patients that were admitted to our level 1 trauma centre from 2010-2014 and presented with severe thoracic injuries (AISThorax ≥3) within 24 h after the injury and required at least 72 h of mechanical ventilation. Patients were either treated with manual turning every 2-4 h or CLRT. To ensure comparable injury severity and a similar risk for posttraumatic respiratory complications, we matched for thoracic injury severity, age, additional injuries (head, abdomen, extremities) and need for massive transfusion. RESULTS: A total of 22 pairs (n = 44 patients) were successfully matched and analysed. The use of CLRT did not have a statistically significant impact on respiratory function, gas exchange, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU or hospital length of stay, or overall patient outcomes (e.g. pneumonia, sepsis, ARDS, mortality). During active rotation the level of sedation was lower compared to manual turning (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale; manual turning: -3.6; CLRT: -4.0; p = 0.01). Patient agitation was noticed more frequently in the CLRT group (manual turning: n = 2 (9%); CLRT: n = 9 (41%); p = 0.02). DISCUSSION: In this well-matched sample, the use of CLRT did not seem to translate into relevant clinical benefits in patients with thoracic trauma in the setting of modern ICU care with the widespread implementation of lung protective ventilation. However, statistical power and generalisability were limited by the small sample size and single centre design. A large RCT is required to provide conclusive results.

Trauma-induced coagulopathy upon emergency room arrival: still a significant problem despite increased awareness and management?

PURPOSE: Over the last decade, the pivotal role of trauma-induced coagulopathy has been described and principal drivers have been identified. We hypothesized that the increased knowledge on coagulopathy of trauma would translate into a more cautious treatment, and therefore, into a reduced overall incidence rate of coagulopathy upon ER admission. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2013, 61,212 trauma patients derived from the TraumaRegister DGU® had a full record of coagulation parameters and were assessed for the presence of coagulopathy. Coagulopathy was defined by a Quick's value < 70% and/or platelet counts < 100,000/µl upon ER admission. For each year, the incidence of coagulopathy, the amount of pre-hospital administered i.v.-fluids and transfusion requirements were assessed. RESULTS: Coagulopathy upon ER admission was present in 24.5% of all trauma patients. Within the years 2002-2013, the annual incidence of coagulopathy decreased from 35 to 20%. Even in most severely injured patients (ISS > 50), the incidence of coagulopathy was reduced by 7%. Regardless of the injury severity, the amount of pre-hospital i.v.-fluids declined during the observed period by 51%. Simultaneously, morbidity and mortality of severely injured patients were on the decrease. CONCLUSION: During the 12 years observed, a substantial decline of coagulopathy has been observed. This was paralleled by a significant decrease of i.v.-fluids administered in the pre-hospital treatment. The reduced presence of coagulopathy translated into decreased transfusion requirements and mortality. Nevertheless, especially in the most severely injured patients, posttraumatic coagulopathy remains a frequent and life-threatening syndrome.