A Single-resident Experience of Overnight Call Activity at a Multi-site Academic Health System.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize urology resident on-call activities overnight at a multi-site academic medical center and model the expected volume of clinical activity using inpatient beds, emergency room visits, and attendings covered. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On-call activities for 70 13-hour overnight shifts spanning 5 nonconsecutive months between May 2022 and February 2023 were recorded. Clinical coverage included 5 academic hospitals encompassing 1761 staffed inpatient beds and an expected nightly volume of 255 Emergency Department (ED) visits. The time, source, and clinical features of every call were documented. RESULTS: An average of 15 unique calls were received during each shift. Of these, 35% required an in-person evaluation and 12% required a bedside or operative procedure. Approximately a third of calls (36%) were received after midnight. An in-person evaluation occurred within the first hour of 53% of shifts and every shift required at least 1 evaluation. When normalized for inpatient bed volume, an average of 7 unique patient communications occurred per 1000 beds, leading to 2 in-person evaluations. When normalized for an expected number of overnight ED visits, an average of 1 new ED consultation occurred per 100 ED visits. CONCLUSION: After-hours clinical coverage models vary significantly by specialty and institution, and coverage decisions must balance quality clinical care with safe provider workload. Patient needs were appropriately addressed by a single overnight on-call resident, providing a robust clinical experience. The volume of patient care activities in this experience supports the practice of a "night-float" resident with the clear expectation on-site care is required.

Program Directors' Perspectives on Residency Applications in the Post‒United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Era: A Case for Standardized Letters of Recommendation?

INTRODUCTION: The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 test evolved into a key metric utilized by program directors (PDs) in assessing candidates for residency. The transition to a USMLE Step 1 binary pass/fail scoring system has resulted in a loss of an important objective assessment. With national movements toward pass/fail systems for clerkship grading and trends toward abandonment of class ranking, assessing residency applications has become increasingly challenging. METHODS: The Society of Academic Urologists convened a task force to, in part, assess the perspectives of urology PDs regarding the importance of various aspects of a residency application for predicting clinical performance. An anonymous survey was disseminated to all urology PDs in the US. Perspectives on 11 potential application predictors of clinical performance and demographics were recorded. Descriptive statistics characterized PD responses. Friedman test and pairwise Wilcoxon tests were used to evaluate the relative ranks assigned to application elements by PDs. RESULTS: There was a 60.5% response rate (89/147). Letters of recommendation (LORs) were ranked as the most important predictor, with a mean rank of 2.39, median of 2 (IQR 1-3). Clerkship grades and USMLE Step 1 were comparable and ranked second. Medical school reputation ranked the lowest. There was significant subjective heterogeneity among categories; however, this was less so for LORs, which predominated as the most important factor among application elements (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest sample size assessing PD perspectives on application factors that predict clinical performance. The second (clerkship grades) and third (USLME Step 1) most important factors moving toward binary pass/fail systems create an opportunity for actionable change to improve assessment objectivity. Our data demonstrate LORs to be the most important factor of residency applications, making a compelling argument for moving toward a standardized LOR to maximize this tool, mitigate bias, and improve interreviewer reliability.

Urinary Metabolic Disturbances During Topiramate Use and their Reversibility Following Drug Cessation.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the metabolic disturbances of stone formers currently taking topiramate and to examine the reversibility of these disturbances with cessation of the medication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All progress notes written by 5 endourologists from a single academic center were retrospectively reviewed from January 2010 to July 2020 containing the words "topiramate" or "topamax." Inclusion criteria were age >18 and presence of either a 24-hour urine sample or stone analysis while on topiramate. In addition, a subgroup of 18 patients with 24-hour urine samples before and after stopping topiramate were identified. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were identified and included for final analysis. Twenty-four hour urine samples were available in 67 patients and showed mean citrate excretion of 331 ± 322 mg/d, mean pH of 6.6 ± 0.5, and mean calcium phosphate supersaturation of 1.9 ± 1.1. In the subgroup analysis urinary citrate excretion increased from 225 mg/d to 614 mg/d (P <.01) and pH decreased from 6.59 ± 0.54 to 6.33 ± 0.47 (P = .06) after stopping topiramate. In addition, 114 stone events occurred in 73 distinct patients, with 50% of stones either pure or majority (≥50%) calcium phosphate by composition. CONCLUSION: Hypocitraturia and elevated pH is seen during topiramate use with resultant higher rate of calcium phosphate stone formation compared to the general population. Stopping topiramate leads to significant increase in citrate excretion and normalization of pH. These metabolic disturbances appear to be reversible with medication cessation.

Resolution of Hydronephrosis and Pain to Predict Stone Passage for Patients With Acute Renal Colic.

OBJECTIVE: To study patients who presented to the Emergency Department with acute renal colic to determine if resolution of hydronephrosis and pain accurately predicts stone passage on follow-up CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial of patients diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) scan with a symptomatic ureteral stone < 9 mm in diameter. Participants were followed after randomization to evaluate for analgesic use and to assess stone passage and hydronephrosis on a repeat CT scan obtained at 29-36 days. RESULTS: Four-hundred-three patients were randomized in the original study and patients were included in this analysis if they did not have surgery for stone removal and had a CT scan and information on pain medication at follow-up (N = 220). Hydronephrosis was detected in 181 (82%) on initial CT. At follow-up CT, 43 (20%) participants had a persistent ureteral stone. Of these patients, 36 (84%) had no pain, 26 (60%) did not have hydronephrosis, and 23 (53%) had neither pain nor hydronephrosis. Resolution of hydronephrosis was associated with stone passage (RR 4.6, 95% CI 1.9, 11.0), while resolution of pain was not (RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9, 1.4). CONCLUSION: In patients with urinary stone disease, stone passage is associated with resolution of hydronephrosis but not resolution of pain. In patients with persistent ureteral stones, neither pain nor hydronephrosis are consistently present. These findings have important implications on follow-up imaging of patients with urinary stone disease.

Resident Duty Hour Compliance and Sleep after Transitioning to a Night Float System: A Prospective Observational Study in an Academic Urology Program.

INTRODUCTION: Our urology residency program transitioned to a night float system, where dedicated residents cover nights and are off duty during the day. Junior residents previously covered 5 hospitals every 5 to 7 nights and worked the following day (home call). This prospective observational study compared the 2 systems before and after the transition. METHODS: A validated survey was administered to residents and faculty to evaluate patient care, communication, quality of life, resident education, and duty hour violations. A separate survey was administered to nurses evaluating the on-call resident. Sleep was measured using actigraphy. RESULTS: Survey response rates were 80% to 100%. Junior residents rated night float as equivalent to home call for surgical case volume and superior in all other respects (p <0.05). Senior residents rated night float as superior for continuity of care, compassion, safety, efficiency for the day team, communication with nurses, quality of life, and time for reading and research (p <0.05). Faculty rated night float as superior for efficiency for the day team, handoffs, quality of life, and time for research (p <0.05). Nurses rated night float higher for availability, knowledge of plan for patient, respectfulness, communication, and ability to identify the resident on call (p <0.05). Mean duration of sleep was 2.5 and 7.1 hours for home call and night float, respectively (p <0.001). Junior residents reported fewer violations of the 80-hour and 8-hour-off rules with night float (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians and nurses perceived night float to improve multiple domains. Residents slept more and had fewer duty hour violations on night float.

Analgesic and Opioid Use for Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department with Ureteral Stones.

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe and characterize the analgesic and opioid use for patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) with renal colic due to ureteral stone. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective trial of ED patients diagnosed by CT scan as having a symptomatic ureteral stone <9 mm in diameter. Participants were contacted after randomization on days 2, 7, 15, 20, and 29 and reported opioid and nonopioid analgesic use and stone passage. CT scan was repeated on day 29 to 36 to confirm passage. Results: Of 403 participants, 314 (77.9%) took an analgesic after discharge and 199 (49.4%) took opioids. Opioids were more commonly used by younger patients (p = 0.04) and those with a family history of stones (p = 0.003). Stone size and tamsulosin use were not associated with analgesic utilization. Shorter time to passage and more distal stone location were associated with less analgesic and opioid use. For those who did not expel a stone, 55.0% took opioids at any time, and for those who did expel a stone, 31.9% took opioids before the stone was expelled and 15.7% took opioids at any time after the stone was expelled. Conclusions: Factors associated with increased use of analgesics in patients discharged from the ED include a longer time to stone passage, no spontaneous passage, and proximal position of the stone in the ureter. Some patients continued to use analgesics after the stone had passed, but most stopped using analgesics by day 29. The study has been registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00382265).

Utilization and Operative Influence of Renal Mass Biopsy in the Small Renal Mass: Analysis from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Small Renal Mass registry.

Introduction and Objective: Definitive inclusion of renal mass biopsy (RMB) in small renal mass (SRM) diagnostic algorithm remains controversial. We assessed incidence and accuracy of RMB in SRMs in the CROES Renal Mass registry and the influence of preoperative RMB on perioperative complications after SRM nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). Materials and Methods: "ad hoc" description of incidence of preoperative RMB and characteristics of SRM cases with and without RMB. Accuracy of RMB was calculated in the SRM subcohort that received extirpative treatment and complication rate after NSS compared to between the two groups. Continuous variables were compared using t-test; categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test. K-statistics was used to analyze agreement between the biopsy histology and surgical pathology. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between RMB and NSS complications. All tests were two sided, and p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The rate of preoperative RMB in SRMs was 11.6% (175/1597) in Europe and the United States. RMB patients were more likely to have hypertension (p < 0.04), be on dialysis (p < 0.024), or smokers (p = 0.005), with multiple/bilateral tumors (0.008 and 0.010) and previous other malignancy (p = 0.021). They underwent radical nephrectomy more frequently than non-RMB group (p = 0.034). RMB was nondiagnostic in 16 cases (9%). Accuracy of RMB in distinguishing malignant from benign was 89.5%. Agreement between biopsy and final surgical pathology was 93% for malignant vs benign tumors (kappa = 0.655). Upstaging to pT3a occurred more frequently in the RMB group (12.6% vs 6.25% [p = 0.022]). Complication rate in renal mass-NSS subcohort was 15.8%, not statistically different between RMB and non-RMB groups. On logistic regression analysis, RMB was not associated with increased risk of postoperative complication after NSS (OR: 0.9, 95% CI: 0.43-1.89). Conclusion: The practice of RMB in SRM is still scarce despite high accuracy and concordance with final pathology. RMB does not seem to increase complication rate after NSS.

Accuracy of Patient Reported Stone Passage for Patients With Acute Renal Colic Treated in the Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: To study patients who initially presented to the Emergency Department with acute renal colic to determine if patient-reported stone passage detects stone expulsion as accurately as follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a multi-center prospective trial of patients diagnosed by a CT scan with a symptomatic ureteral stone <9 mm in diameter. Patient-reported stone passage, defined as capture or visualization of the stone, was compared to CT scan-confirmed passage performed 29-36 days after initial presentation. RESULTS: Four-hundred-three patients were randomized in the original study and 21 were excluded from this analysis because they were lost to follow-up or received ureteroscopic surgery. Of the 382 remaining evaluable patients, 237 (62.0%) underwent a follow-up CT scan. The mean (standard deviation) diameter of the symptomatic kidney stone was 3.8 mm (1.4). In those who reported stone passage, 93.8% (91/97) demonstrated passage of the symptomatic ureteral stone on follow-up CT. Of patients who did not report stone passage, 72.1% (101/140) demonstrated passage of their stone on follow-up CT. CONCLUSIONS: For patients who report capture or visualization of a ureteral stone, a follow-up CT scan may not be needed to verify stone passage. For patients who do not capture their stone or visualize stone passage, imaging should be considered to confirm passage.

Defining a clinically significant struvite stone: a non-randomized retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To study the association between a stone's struvite content and clinical outcomes and to determine a clinically significant cutoff for defining struvite stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all patients who underwent ureteroscopy or PCNL at our institution between 2012 and 2017 and had any component of struvite in the stone analysis. Patients were divided into four groups based on percent struvite content: A (1-25%), B (26-50%), C (51-75%), and D (76-100%). Bacterial characteristics were compared between groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the association between struvite content and postoperative SIRS. Log-rank test was used to compare between the four groups' recurrence rates. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were included in the study. Positive preoperative urine culture was found in 31%, 81%, 87%, and 90% of patients from group A, B, C, and D, respectively. E. Coli was the most common pathogen in group A (54%), while Proteus was the most common pathogen in groups C (53%) and D (47%). Enterococci isolation rates remained similar between groups A-D, ranging from 23 to 33%. Postoperative SIRS occurred in 2.4%, 21.3%, 26.7%and 47.4% of the patients from groups A, B, C, and D, respectively, and was associated with struvite content and age on multivariate analysis. Increasing struvite content was associated with higher 2-year recurrence rate. CONCLUSIONS: Higher struvite content is associated with a higher frequency of traditional urea splitting bacteria in urine culture, higher risk for postoperative SIRS, and higher recurrence rate. Struvite content greater than 25% can be used to define a clinically significant struvite stone.

Effect of Tamsulosin on Passage of Symptomatic Ureteral Stones: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Urinary stone disease is a common presentation in the emergency department, and α-adrenergic receptor blockers, such as tamsulosin, are commonly used to facilitate stone passage. Objective: To determine if tamsulosin promotes the passage of urinary stones within 28 days among emergency department patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial from 2008 to 2009 (first phase) and then from 2012 to 2016 (second phase). Participants were followed for 90 days. The first phase was conducted at a single US emergency department; the second phase was conducted at 6 US emergency departments. Adult patients were eligible to participate if they presented with a symptomatic urinary stone in the ureter less than 9 mm in diameter, as demonstrated on computed tomography. Interventions: Participants were randomized to treatment with either tamsulosin, 0.4 mg, or matching placebo daily for 28 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was stone passage based on visualization or capture by the study participant by day 28. Secondary outcomes included crossover to open-label tamsulosin, time to stone passage, return to work, use of analgesic medication, hospitalization, surgical intervention, and repeated emergency department visit for urinary stones. Results: The mean age of 512 participants randomized to tamsulosin or placebo was 40.6 years (range, 18-74 years), 139 (27.1%) were female, and 110 (22.8%) were nonwhite. The mean (SD) diameter of the urinary stones was 3.8 (1.4) mm. Four hundred ninety-seven patients were evaluated for the primary outcome. Stone passage rates were 50% in the tamsulosin group and 47% in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.05; 95.8% CI, 0.87-1.27; P = .60), a nonsignificant difference. None of the secondary outcomes were significantly different. All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle, although patients lost to follow-up before stone passage were excluded from the analysis of final outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: Tamsulosin did not significantly increase the stone passage rate compared with placebo. Our findings do not support the use of tamsulosin for symptomatic urinary stones smaller than 9 mm. Guidelines for medical expulsive therapy for urinary stones may need to be revised. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00382265.

Conservative Management of Staghorn Calculi: When Is It Safe?

BACKGROUND: To describe the clinical characteristics, infectious and kidney function patterns, and overall outcomes in a cohort of patients with staghorn calculi treated conservatively. METHODS: Staghorn calculi treated nonoperatively between January 2009 and January 2017 were identified. A retrospective analysis was completed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were identified with a median age of 74 years (interquartile range [IQR] 61-81). Mean follow-up was 24 months. Fifty-nine percent (17/29) had complete staghorn calculi with 6/29 (21%) bilateral. Mean body mass index was 29.4 (IQR 24.8-31.7). Of the 29 patients, 14 were treated conservatively due to comorbidities, 12 refused treatments, and 3 were due to aberrant anatomy. The age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score demonstrated 8 patients in our cohort with a CCI of <3, 11 patients with a CCI of 4 or 5, 7 patients with a CCI of 6 or 7, and 3 patients with a CCI of >8. Overall, kidney function remained stable for 19/29 patients (66%) and the glomerular filtration rate decreased by <10% for 4/29 (14%), by 10%-29% for 2/29 (7%), and >30% for 4/29 patients (14%) over the study period. None of the study patients required hemodialysis. No patients in the cohort developed an abscess, nor were any patients on daily prophylactic antibiotics. There was only one related admission for a complication during the study; this was for pyelonephritis. There were two deaths during the study period. One death was an unrelated cardiac death and the other was from urosepsis; this patient had been noncompliant with follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes for patients treated conservatively were reasonable in this select group. There is a need for future prospective studies to show whether conservative treatment of these patients is safe.

The Efficacy of Tadalafil Daily vs on Demand in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

We present a review comparing the use of tadalafil daily vs on-demand for erectile dysfunction. We examined randomized controlled trials and observational studies that examined the use of tadalafil for at least 8 weeks of follow-up with the primary outcome of International Index for Erectile Dysfunction-Erectile Function domain. Eight studies that examined the desired dosing regimens were identified. Of these, 6 studies included the primary end point of 12 weeks. Those patients taking tadalafil daily for 12 weeks scored on average 1.82 points higher in International Index for Erectile Dysfunction-Erectile Function domain scores, although the difference may not be clinically significant (Fig. 1).

Appearance of Pyelitis Emphysematosa on Computed Tomography.

Pyelitis emphysematosa is a gas-forming infection characterized by gas located within the wall of the collecting system and renal pelvis. There are only 2 reported cases of pyelitis emphysematosa in the literature, neither of which occurred in the era of cross-sectional imaging. Here we present a case of pyelitis emphysematosa occurring in an elderly female with congenital left renal atrophy and chronic right hydronephrosis secondary to ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Design and challenges of a randomized clinical trial of medical expulsive therapy (tamsulosin) for urolithiasis in the emergency department.

Urolithiasis or urinary stone disease has been estimated to affect about 1 in 11 Americans. Patients with urinary stone disease commonly present to the emergency department for management of their acute pain. In addition to providing analgesia, administration of drug (medical expulsive therapy) is often prescribed to assist passage of the urinary stone. In this methodology paper, we describe the design of a prospective, multi-center, randomized, double-blind placebo controlled clinical trial of the alpha-adrenergic blocker, tamsulosin, to evaluate its effectiveness as medical expulsive therapy. In addition, we describe the unique challenges of conducting a trial of this type within the setting of the emergency department.

Survey of Applicant Experience and Cost in the Urology Match: Opportunities for Reform.

PURPOSE: The urology match is highly competitive but there is a paucity of published data regarding the costs and barriers that applicants face. We gathered data on contributors to cost in the 2014 urology residency match. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was sent to all applicants offered an interview at each of 18 participating institutions. Information on demographics, interview related costs, access to financial aid, frequency of away rotations and second look invitations was collected. RESULTS: A total of 173 respondents spent a median of $7,000 on the urology match. Applicants attended a mean of 14 interviews with an average per interview cost of $500. Overall 95% of respondents did at least 1 away rotation and 79% reported being asked to return for a second look interview at least once. Of the respondents 66% did not receive any financial aid for interviews and only 28% believed their financial aid departments provided adequate financial planning. Of those surveyed 20% indicated that their financial situation limited the number of interviews they attended. CONCLUSIONS: We estimate that $3,122,000 was spent by applicants on the 2014 urology match. One in 5 applicants reported limiting the number of interviews they attended due to financial concerns. Adequate financial planning resources were not widely available. Nearly all applicants went on an away rotation and encouragement to return for second look interviews was common. These factors may contribute to financial and regional bias in the match process, and are potential targets for reform.