Does the AAMC's Definition of "Underrepresented in Medicine" Promote Justice and Inclusivity?

In 2003, the Association of American Medical Colleges reframed the concept underrepresented minorities as underrepresented in medicine (URiM), which defines representation in medicine relative to representation in the US population. Schools are permitted to construct URiM definitions, suggesting the importance of regarding them as fluid works in progress as US demographics evolve. Where medical school admissions processes consider applicants' backgrounds and experiences of identity minoritization to be valuable, progress toward inclusive representation has been made. This article considers whether school-based URiM definitions are ethically sufficient and canvasses possible next steps in realizing equitable representation in medical education.

Third place: Flank position is associated with higher skin-to-surface interface pressures in men versus women: implications for laparoscopic renal surgery and the risk of rhabdomyolysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There have been several reports of rhabdomyolysis occurring after prolonged laparoscopic procedures in the flank position. Accordingly, we evaluated interface pressures between the skin and three commonly used operating room table surfaces. The aim of our study was to determine if pressure changes could be related to body mass index (BMI), sex, position, and/or the table surface material. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten men and 10 women were grouped according to BMI <25 or >or=25, with five participants in each group. Subjects were placed in the left lateral decubitus position with the operating table flat, half flexed, fully flexed, half flexed with the kidney rest elevated, and fully flexed with the kidney rest elevated. Interface pressures were recorded, using an X-Sensor pressure sensing mat, for 5-minute periods in each of the described positions on each surface. RESULTS: Sex and BMI were statistically significant predictors of increased pressures (P= 0.0042 and 0.0402, respectively). The parameter estimate for the difference between men and women was 4.63 mm Hg (P= 0.0002), and the difference for BMI >or= 25 compared with <25 was also significant (P < 0.0209). Full table flexion (50-degree) produced significantly higher pressures than both flat (P= 0.0001) and the half-flexed (25-degree) position (P < 0.0001). Positions with the kidney rest elevated were associated with significantly higher pressures than without elevation (P < 0.0001). With regard to the surface used, egg crate provided lower pressures than gel pads (P= 0.0117). CONCLUSION: Women have significantly lower interface pressures when compared with men. BMI >or= 25 also increases interface pressures. The use of the kidney rest is associated with markedly increased pressure; use of a half-flexed position is preferable to a full-flexed position. These data have implications for patient positioning and identification of persons at risk for rhabdomyolysis during laparoscopic renal surgery.

Evaluation of practice efficiency with a novel sheathed flexible cystoscope: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The processing of standard flexible cystoscopes is time-consuming and potentially hazardous to healthcare staff. We evaluated a novel flexible cystoscope system containing a disposable sheath, which obviates the need for chemical processing. METHODS: A total of 100 patients undergoing office cystoscopy were randomized into a "sheath" or a control group (n = 50 for each group). Disposable Slide-On sheaths and the CST-2000 Flexible Cystoscope System were used in the former group. A standard 16F flexible cystoscope, manually cleaned and disinfected with Cidex OPA or Rapicide, was used in the control group and the preparation times were recorded. Questionnaires to assess cystoscope setup, handling, optical quality, and patient comfort were completed by the physician, nursing staff, and patients. RESULTS: Data were available for 97 patients. The mean total time required for preparation of the cystoscopes was 10.7, 14.7, and 42.2 minutes for the sheath (n = 49), Rapicide (n = 21), and Cidex OPA (n = 27), respectively (P <0.01 for all comparisons). The control group scored better than the sheath group with regard to ease of cystoscope insertion (9.1 versus 7.7), cystoscope handling (8.8 versus 8.1), and irrigation setup (8.8 versus 8.2; all P < or = 0.01). No statistically significant difference was found between groups for procedure time, optical quality, or patient comfort, either during or after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The EndoSheath System can save 4 to 31 minutes of processing time while avoiding exposure to irritants found in conventional soaking methods. Although maneuvering of the sheathed cystoscope was slightly more difficult, the optical quality and patient comfort were similar to those of standard flexible cystoscopy.

Electronic health records documentation in nursing: nurses' perceptions, attitudes, and preferences.

A descriptive study of 100 nursing personnel at a large Magnet hospital in Southwest Florida was conducted to assess their needs, preferences, and perceptions associated with Electronic Health Record (EHR) documentation methods. Nurses' attitudes about the use of EHRs and their perceived effects on patient care were assessed. The five-item, Likert-type attitude scale explained 54% of the variance in attitude scores and demonstrated sound construct validity and internal consistency (r = 0.77). More than one third, 36%, perceived that EHRs had resulted in a decreased workload. The majority of nurses, 64%, preferred bedside documentation but reported that environmental and system barriers often prevent EHR charting at the bedside. Overall, 75% of nurses thought EHRs had improved the quality of documentation and 76% believed electronic charting would lead to improved safety and patient care. Nurses with expertise in computer use, 80%, had a more favorable attitude toward EHRs than those with less expertise. Results have been used to implement clinical system changes.

Identifying potentially ineffective care in a community hospital.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a formula to predict mortality for intensive care unit patients between day 5 in an intensive care unit and 100 days after hospital discharge from a community hospital. DESIGN: Retrospective 1-yr derivation study with validation on a subsequent year's intensive care unit population. SETTING: An 850-bed, not-for-profit community hospital with three adult intensive care units, including medical-surgical, cardiac-medical, and cardiac-surgical units. PATIENTS: The development patient set included 4045 consecutive adult admissions to the intensive care unit between July 1995 and June 1996. The validation sample consisted of 4084 admissions between July 1996 and June 1997. RESULTS: During the first year, 100-day posthospital discharge mortality was predicted by the combination Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III predicted mortality on day 5 of >0.92 or the product of day 1 and day 5 APACHE predicted mortality of >0.40, with an increase in the APACHE predicted mortality from day 1 to day 5 of >0.10. Specificity in the development cohort was 0.99, sensitivity was 0.30, and positive predictive value was 0.95. The second-year validation study demonstrated a specificity, sensitivity, and positive predictive value of 0.98, 0.29, and 0.91, respectively, when applying the model to the validation sample. CONCLUSIONS: By using readily available APACHE III data, we were able to identify patients at high risk of dying between intensive care unit day 5 and 100 days after discharge. Although the low sensitivity limits the number of patients for whom death at 100 days is predicted, the high specificity and positive predictive value suggests this information may provide useful information for families and physicians. If these formulas can be validated in diverse institutional settings, decisions regarding short- and long-term outcomes may be improved by using objective survival predictions from two time points.