Correlation Between Radiology ACGME Case Logs Values and ABR Core Exam Pass Rate.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: There is discordance between the American Board of Radiology (ABR) and many radiology trainees with respect to the most appropriate means to prepare for the ABR Core Examination. Whereas the ABR suggests that participation in routine clinical examination interpretation best prepares a trainee for the practical material of the test, residents, and many program directors feel that time away from clinical service for study and review courses are necessary. This study examines the relationship between studies interpreted in the first three years of residency as reported in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs and performance of first-time test takers on the ABR Core Examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case log data was anonymized for a single year cohort of residents in all accredited radiology residencies. This was then provided to the ABR and matched with performance on the Core Examination. A random effects logistic regression model was used to evaluate for a relationship between the number of examinations read and the pass/fail status of the Core Exam. RESULTS: Modeling using a linear and a quadratic term yields a significant relationship between case log values and Core Exam performance. There is a positive correlation until an inflection point of approximately 11,000 examinations, at which point a negative correlation develops. CONCLUSION: The data supports that active engagement in clinical duties is associated with better performance on the ABR Core Examination, with the caveat that there appears to be a point at which service outweighs educational value. Beyond this, performance on the examination declines.

El valor del aprendizaje y la evaluación permanentes para los radiólogos / The value of life-long learning and assessment for radiologists

No disponible

Snapshot of a Specialty: Results of the ABR 2016 Radiation Oncology Clinical Practice Analysis.

PURPOSE: Beginning in 2010, the ABR has administered triennial clinical practice analysis surveys to inform examination development volunteers and staff about the actual state of radiation oncology practice. METHODS AND MATERIALS: As reported here, the 2016 survey was designed to provide objective data regarding actual patient volumes of specific disease sites and subjective insight as to the importance and relevance of site-specific therapy to individual practices. RESULTS: The survey instrument was circulated to 4,075 radiation oncologists listed in the membership database of the American Society for Radiation Oncology, and responses were received from 690 (16.9%); a total of 287 (41.5%) self-identified as being in academic practice. Even in the academic setting, a majority (216 of 287, or 75.3%) indicated that they spend most of their time in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the survey are informative regarding changes in the practice of radiation oncology over the past 6 years.

Recent Changes to ABR Maintenance of Certification Part 4 (PQI): Acknowledgment of Radiologists' Activities to Improve Quality and Safety.

The ABR has recently reviewed and revised its policy establishing how ABR diplomates may comply with requirements for Maintenance of Certification Part 4: Practice Quality Improvement (PQI). The changes were deemed necessary by the Board of Trustees to acknowledge and credit the numerous ways in which radiology professionals contribute to improving patient care through existing and evolving activities available to them within the radiology community. In addition to meeting requirements by completing a traditional PQI project, the policy revision now allows diplomates to meet criteria by completing one of a number of activities in an expanded spectrum of PQI options recognized by the ABR. The new policy also acknowledges the maturing state of quality improvement science by permitting PQI projects to use "any standard quality improvement methodology," such as Six Sigma, Lean, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model for Improvement, and others in addition to the previously prescribed three-phase plan-do-study-act format.

Time management: a realistic approach.

Realistic time management and organization plans can improve productivity and the quality of life. However, these skills can be difficult to develop and maintain. The key elements of time management are goals, organization, delegation, and relaxation. The author addresses each of these components and provides suggestions for successful time management.