Cultivation, chemistry, and genome of Psilocybe zapotecorum.

Psilocybe zapotecorum is a strongly blue-bruising psilocybin mushroom used by indigenous groups in southeastern Mexico and beyond. While this species has a rich history of ceremonial use, research into its chemistry and genetics have been limited. Herein, we detail mushroom morphology and report on cultivation parameters, chemical profile, and the full genome sequence of P. zapotecorum . First, growth and cloning methods are detailed that are simple, and reproducible. In combination with high resolution microscopic analysis, the strain was barcoded, confirming species-level identification. Full genome sequencing reveals the architecture of the psilocybin gene cluster in P. zapotecorum, and can serve as a reference genome for Psilocybe Clade I. Characterization of the tryptamine profile revealed a psilocybin concentration of 17.9±1.7 mg/g, with a range of 10.6-25.7 mg/g (n=7), and similar tryptamines (psilocin, baeocystin, norbaeocystin, norpsilocin, aeruginascin, 4-HO-tryptamine, and tryptamine) in lesser concentrations for a combined tryptamine concentration of 22.5±3.2 mg/g. These results show P. zapotecorum to be a potent - and variable - Psilocybe mushroom. Chemical profiling, genetic analysis, and cultivation assist in demystifying these mushrooms. As clinical studies with psilocybin gain traction, understanding the diversity of psilocybin mushrooms will assure that psilocybin therapy does not become synonymous with psilocybin mushrooms.

Direct to Implant Reconstruction.

Implant-based breast reconstruction remains the most commonly performed type of restorative surgery after mastectomy for breast cancer. Placement of a tissue expander at the time of mastectomy allows gradual skin envelope expansion but requires additional surgery and time to completion of a patient's reconstruction. Direct-to-implant reconstruction provides a one-stage, final implant insertion, thereby bypassing the need for serial tissue expansion. With proper patient selection, successful preservation of the breast skin envelope, and accurate implant size and placement, direct-to-implant reconstruction has a very high rate of success and patient satisfaction.

Multiplexed Human Gene Expression Analysis Reveals a Central Role of the TLR/mTOR/PPARγ and NFkB Axes in Burn and Inhalation Injury-Induced Changes in Systemic Immunometabolism and Long-Term Patient Outcomes.

Burn patients are subject to significant acute immune and metabolic dysfunction. Concomitant inhalation injury increases mortality by 20%. In order to identify specific immune and metabolic signaling pathways in burn (B), inhalation (I), and combined burn-inhalation (BI) injury, unbiased nanoString multiplex technology was used to investigate gene expression within peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from burn patients, with and without inhalation injury. PBMCs were collected from 36 injured patients and 12 healthy, non-burned controls within 72 h of injury. mRNA was isolated and hybridized with probes for 1342 genes related to general immunology and cellular metabolism. From these specific gene patterns, specific cellular perturbations and signaling pathways were inferred using robust bioinformatic tools. In both B and BI injuries, elements of mTOR, PPARγ, TLR, and NF-kB signaling pathways were significantly altered within PBMC after injury compared to PBMC from the healthy control group. Using linear regression modeling, (1) DEPTOR, LAMTOR5, PPARγ, and RPTOR significantly correlated with patient BMI; (2) RPTOR significantly correlated with patient length of stay, and (3) MRC1 significantly correlated with the eventual risk of patient mortality. Identification of mediators of this immunometabolic response that can act as biomarkers and/or therapeutic targets could ultimately aid the management of burn patients.

Commonly performed pelvic binder modifications for femoral access may hinder binder efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic fractures are common and potentially life-threatening. Pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCD) can temporize hemorrhage, but more invasive strategies that involve femoral access may be necessary for definitive treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of PCCDs reducing open book pelvic fractures when utilizing commonly described modifications and placement adjustments that allow for access to the femoral vasculature. METHODS: Open book pelvic fractures were created in adult cadavers. Three commercially available PCCDs were used to reduce fractures. The binders were properly placed, moved caudally, or moved cranially and modified. Fracture reduction rates were then recorded. RESULTS: The pelvic fracture was completely reduced with every PCCD tested when properly placed. Reduction rates decreased with improper placement and modifications. CONCLUSION: Modifying PCCD placement to allow femoral access decreased the effectiveness of these devices Clinicians should be aware of this possibility when caring for critically injured trauma patients with pelvic fractures.

Length of stay and trauma center finances: A disparity of payer source at a Level I trauma center.

BACKGROUND: In an effort to reduce costs, hospitals focus efforts on reducing length of stay (LOS) and often benchmark LOS against the geometric LOS (GMLOS) as predicted by the assigned diagnosis-related group (DRG) used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the impact of exceeding GMLOS on hospital profit/loss with respect to payer source. METHODS: Contribution margin for each insured patient admitted to a Level I trauma center between July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2019, was determined. Age, ethnicity, race, DRG weight, DRG version, injury severity, intensive care unit admission status, mechanical ventilation, payer, exceeding GMLOS, and the interaction between payer and exceeding the GMLOS were regressed on contribution margin to determine significant predictors of positive contribution margin. RESULTS: Among 2,449 insured trauma patients, the distribution of payers was Medicaid (54.6%), Medicare (24.0%), and commercial (21.4%). Thirty-five percent (n = 867) of patient LOS exceeded GMLOS. Exceeding GMLOS by 10 or more days was significantly more likely for Medicaid and Medicare patients in stepwise fashion (commercial, 2.7%; Medicaid, 4.5%; Medicare, 6.0%; p = 0.030). Median contribution margin was positive for commercially insured patients ($16,913) and negative for Medicaid (-$8,979) and Medicare (-$2,145) patients. Adjusted multivariate modeling demonstrated that when exceeding GMLOS, Medicare and Medicaid cases were less likely than commercial payers to have a positive contribution margin (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Government-insured patients, despite having a payer source, are a financial burden to a trauma center. Excess LOS among government insured patients, but not the commercially insured, exacerbates financial loss. A shift toward a greater proportion of government insured patients may result in a significant fiscal liability for a trauma center. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Value-Based Evaluation, Level III.

Trauma patient transport times unchanged despite trauma center proliferation: A 10-year review.

INTRODUCTION: In certain regions of the United States, there has been a dramatic proliferation of trauma centers. The goal of our study was to evaluate transport times during this period of trauma center proliferation. METHODS: Aggregated data summarizing level I trauma center admissions in Arizona between 2009 and 2018 were provided to our institution by the Arizona Department of Health Services. We evaluated patient demographics, transport times, and injury severity for both rural and urban injuries. RESULTS: Data included statistics summarizing 266,605 level I trauma admissions in the state of Arizona. The number of state-designated trauma centers during this time increased from 14 to 47, with level I centers increasing from 8 to 13. Slight decreases in mean Injury Severity Score (rural, 9.4 vs. 8.4; urban, 7.9 vs. 7.0) were observed over this period. Median transport time for cases transported from the injury scene directly to a level I center remained stable in urban areas at 0.9 hours in both 2009 and 2018. In rural areas, transport times for these cases were approximately double but also stable, with median times of 1.8 and 1.9 hours. Transport times for cases requiring interfacility transfer before admission at a level I center increased by 0.3 hours for urban injuries (5.3-5.6 hours) and 0.9 hours for rural injuries (5.6-6.5 hours). CONCLUSION: Despite the threefold increase in the number of state-designated trauma centers, transport time has not decreased in urban or rural areas. This finding highlights the need for regulatory oversight regarding the number and geographic placement of state-designated trauma centers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care management, level IV, Epidemiological, level III.

How to Optimize Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

Prepectoral breast reconstruction has become a popular method of postmastectomy breast reconstruction due to its numerous benefits in properly selected patients. Prepectoral reconstruction, as compared with retropectoral position, offers the advantage of leaving the pectoralis muscle undisturbed and in its original anatomic position, resulting in significantly decreased acute and chronic pain, improved upper extremity strength and range of motion, and avoidance of animation deformity. The use of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) allows for precise control of the breast pocket, resulting in aesthetic outcomes and high patient satisfaction. ADMs have the added benefit of reducing capsular contracture, especially in the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy. Although prepectoral breast reconstruction is effective, the breast implant is placed closer to the skin flap with less vascularized soft tissue coverage. Therefore, optimizing outcomes in prepectoral breast reconstruction requires careful patient selection, intraoperative mastectomy flap evaluation, and perioperative surgical algorithms specific to prepectoral reconstruction.

Is the Vectra 3D Imaging System a Reliable Tool for Predicting Breast Mass?

BACKGROUND: In selecting breast implants for breast reconstruction, current preoperative planning largely relies on 2-dimensional measurements, which are often limited in suboptimal accuracy and objectivity. Although the introduction of 3-dimensional imaging modalities has further improved preoperative planning, they require in-depth analysis of accuracy if they are to be considered as a standardized part of preoperative planning. Thus, the present study analyzes the reliability of the Vectra 3D Imaging System in predicting breast mass and explores potential confounding variables that may limit its accuracy. METHODS: A retrospective review of 202 breasts that received direct-to-implant reconstruction by a single surgeon between February 2015 and February 2019 was conducted. Variables recorded included Vectra predicted mass (VPM; in grams), mastectomy mass (MM; in grams), ptosis grade, and body mass index (BMI). Body mass index was classified as follows: underweight (BMI < 20 kg/m), normal (20 kg/m ≤ BMI < 25 kg/m), overweight (25 kg/m ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m), and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m). Cup size was approximated as follows: A and smaller (MM ≤250 g), B (250 g < MM ≤ 450 g), C (450 g < MM ≤ 600 g), and D and larger (MM ≥ 600 g). Correlation between MM and VPM was evaluated using 2-tailed Pearson correlation coefficients (r), and associated formula was derived from a linear model. Equality of variances was assessed with the Bartlett test. Correlation coefficients calculated for ptosis and BMI categories were then compared with the overall correlation coefficient. Significance was set at α = 0.05, and analyses were conducted in R 3.6.0, version 1.70. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between MM and VPM (R = 0.90, P < 0.0001). The following equation was derived to predict MM: [MM] = 0.8 × [VPM] + 32 (adjusted r = 0.81). The Bartlett test indicated that VPM varies significantly across cup sizes (P < 0.0001). Comparison of correlation coefficients for ptosis and BMI categories revealed a significantly reduced correlation coefficient for pseudoptosis (0.90 vs 0.75, P = 0.0425). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that the reliability of Vectra in predicting breast mass varies across cup sizes and that there exists a significantly decreased association between VPM and MM among pseudoptotic breasts. These are important considerations when using this technology in surgical planning.

Are all trauma centers created equal? Level 1 to level 1 trauma center patient transfers in the setting of rapid trauma center proliferation.

BACKGROUND: Level 1 trauma centers should provide definitive care for every aspect of injury. However, in environments that have experienced trauma center proliferation, not all level 1 centers may have the resources or expertise needed for every patient, necessitating transfer to another trauma center. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of such transfers and associated impact on patient outcome and burden on the receiving level 1 center. METHODS: In a metropolitan area experiencing trauma center proliferation, we performed a 5.5-year review of patient transfers to an established level 1 (index center) from other state designated level 1 centers. American College of Surgeons verification level was identified for each facility. Comparisons were performed between the cohort of transferred patients and patients with similar demographics, injury patterns, and severity managed at the index center using propensity score matching. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were received from other state level 1 centers (39% American College of Surgeons level 2, 61% American College of Surgeons level 1). Nearly 70% of patients were transferred for definitive evaluation and/or management of brain, spine, or cerebrovascular injury. For 76% of this subgroup, specialty consultation was available, but the injury was deemed beyond their capability. Comparison of the transfer cohort propensity score matched to the control cohort (93 vs. 558 patients) demonstrated increased length of stay (6.5 days vs. 4.6 days, p = 0.001) and cost (US $36,027 vs. US $30,654, p = 0.033) associated with the transfer cohort, with similar mortality (12.1% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.492). CONCLUSION: The number of level 1 to level 1 transfers observed imply a disparity in resources and capability among level 1 trauma centers in the region. The majority of transfers were for neurosurgical care, suggestive of a deficit of adequate neurosurgical coverage in the setting of trauma center proliferation. Both patients and established trauma centers bear the burden for these transfers with respect to increased cost and length of stay. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care management, level IV.

Direct to implant breast reconstruction: visualized technique.

Over the past 19 years, direct to implant (DTI) breast reconstruction has been found to decrease medical system cost, improve psychosocial morbidity, and optimize cosmetic outcomes. Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) have further improved reconstructive outcomes, as the tissue incorporates with new angiogenesis and tissue regeneration. ADMs have been used by the senior author since 2000, and have since become a cornerstone of implant-based reconstruction. The senior author began using contoured perforated ready to use ADM in 2015 and is currently studying the effect of this change on breast reconstruction outcomes. This article details the senior author's technique in performing DTI breast reconstruction and highlights the operative components necessary for success.

The health literacy of hospitalized trauma patients: We should be screening for deficiencies.

BACKGROUND: Although the impact of health literacy (HL) on trauma patient outcomes remains unclear, recent studies have demonstrated that trauma patients with deficient HL have poor understanding of their injuries, are less likely to comply with follow-up, and are relatively less satisfied with physician communication. In this study, we sought to determine if HL deficiency was associated with comprehension of discharge instructions. METHODS: In this prospective study, hospitalized trauma patients underwent evaluation of HL prior to discharge. Newest Vital Sign (NVS) instrument was used to score HL as deficient, marginal, or proficient. Three days postdischarge, patients were telephonically administered a six-point scored questionnaire regarding comprehension of discharge instructions. A general linear model was used to determine the association between HL and comprehension of discharge instructions. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were administered both NVS and discharge instruction questionnaire. Ten (15.9%) patients scored as deficient in HL on the NVS screen, 16 (25.4%) as marginally proficient, and 37 (58.7%) as proficient. The HL proficiency significantly predicted follow-up score with increasing proficiency associated with higher scores on the discharge comprehension assessment (p < 0.001). Adjusted mean scores (± SE) for deficient, marginal, and proficient patients were 2.8 ± 0.5, 3.2 ± 0.4, and 4.7 ± 0.2. Post hoc comparisons demonstrated significant differences between proficient with marginal proficiency (p = 0.002) and deficient proficiency (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Performance on bedside test of HL among trauma inpatients predicted ability to comprehend instructions following hospital discharge. This study supports the value of HL screening prior to discharge. The HL-deficient patients may benefit from a transitional care program to improve comprehension of discharge instructions after leaving the hospital. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management, level III.

Letting the Numbers Speak for Themselves: A Simple Approach to Cost Reduction for Laparoscopic Appendectomy.

Instrument choices are influenced primarily by a surgeon's training and individual preference. Cost is often of secondary interest, particularly in the absence of any contracted fiscal obligation to the hospital. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how a simple intervention involving dissemination of cost data among a surgeon peer group influenced behavior with respect to surgical instrument choice. Cost data for laparoscopic appendectomies between July-December 2016 were disseminated to surgeons belonging to the same department of a teaching hospital. Each surgeon was provided his or her own cost data along with blinded data for his or her peers for comparison. Cost for each disposable instrument used among the group was provided for reference. Costs of laparoscopic appendectomy performed after the intervention (June-December 2017) were compared with costs before the intervention, for both individual surgeons and the group as a whole. A random effects linear regression model clustered on surgeon was then used to assess the average cost saving of the intervention while accounting for the intracorrelation of surgeon costs. One outlier was removed from the analysis, resulting in a cohort of 89 cases before the intervention and 74 postintervention. After outlier removal, data were normally distributed. The mean cost per case decreased for 10 of the 11 surgeons analyzed (minimum decrease of $7 to maximum decrease of $725). The remaining surgeon increased from an average of $985 ± 235 pre-intervention to $1003 ± 227 postintervention. The average cost saving for the group was $238 ± 226 and was associated with an average reduction in cost of 21 per cent. A linear regression analysis clustered on surgeon suggested the intervention was associated with an average saving of $260 (ß = -260, SE = 39, P < 0.001). After dissemination of cost data among surgeon peers, a reduction in costs was observed. Most notably, significant savings occurred in the absence of any mandate or incentive to reduce costs. Providing cost data to surgeons to facilitate natural competition among peers is a simple and effective tool for reducing operating room costs.

Autologous reconstruction following nipple sparing mastectomy: a comprehensive review of the current literature.

As surgical methods continue to evolve and patients become more educated consumers of their medical care, both oncologic breast surgeons and reconstructive plastic surgeons should understand the current options for surgical management of breast cancer. This review evaluates the current autologous breast reconstruction options following nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM). A comprehensive review of the current literature discussing autologous reconstruction after NSM was performed. Fat grafting alone has been used to reconstruct small to medium sized-breasts over multiple injection sessions. Goldilocks mastectomy-like reconstructions can be used for larger, more ptotic breasts. Pedicled latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps can be used, but usually need to be modified to ensure sufficient breast volume. While the lower abdominal tissue remains the most common donor site in free tissue transfer, other donor sites can be used if there is insufficient volume or inadequate perforators. Periareolar incisions are associated with the highest rates of overall complications and nipple areola complex necrosis. It has not been determined whether implant-based or autologous reconstructions have lower complication rates. Both prior radiation and large, ptotic breasts present unique challenges during reconstruction. Overall, there is a high rate of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction following NSM. Autologous breast reconstruction after NSM is a safe method of breast cancer surgical management with aesthetically excellent results. Multiple techniques have been described along the reconstructive ladder. Special consideration should be given to choices of incision, previously irradiated breasts, and large, ptotic breasts.

Health literacy and quality of physician-trauma patient communication: Opportunity for improvement.

BACKGROUND: Although physician-patient communication and health literacy (HL) have been studied in diverse patient groups, there has been little focus on trauma patients. A quality improvement project was undertaken at our Level I trauma center to improve patient perception of physician-patient communication, with consideration of the effect of HL. We report the first phase of this project, namely the reference level of satisfaction with physician-patient communication as measured by levels of interpersonal care among patients at an urban Level I trauma center. METHODS: Level I trauma center patients were interviewed during hospitalization (August 2016 to January 2017). Short Assessment of Health Literacy tool was used to stratify subjects by deficient versus adequate HL. Interpersonal Processes of Care survey was administered to assess perception of physician-patient communication. This survey allowed patients to rate physician-patient interaction across six domains: "clarity," "elicited concerns," "explained results," "worked together (on decision making)," "compassion and respect," and "lack of discrimination by race/ethnicity." Each is scored on a five-point scale. Frequencies of "top-box" (5/5) scores were compared for significance (p < 0.05) between HL-deficient and HL-adequate patients. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-nine patients participated. Average age was 42 years, 33% female. Forty-nine (25%) patients had deficient HL. The majority of patients in both groups rated communication below 5/5 across all domains except "compassion and respect" and "lack of discrimination by race/ethnicity." Health literacy-deficient patients were consistently less likely to give physicians top-box scores, most notably in the "elicited concerns" domain (35% vs. 54%, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Health literacy-deficient patients appear relatively less satisfied with physician communication, particularly with respect to perceiving that their concerns are being heard. Overall, however, the majority of patients in both groups were unlikely to score physician communication in the "top box." Efforts to improve physician-trauma patient communication are warranted, with attention directed toward meeting the needs of HL-deficient patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/Epidemiologic, level I.

Early Distraction for Mild to Moderate Unilateral Craniofacial Microsomia: Long-Term Follow-Up, Outcomes, and Recommendations.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy regarding the treatment of young patients with unilateral craniofacial microsomia and moderate dysmorphism. The relative indication for mandibular distraction in such patients poses several questions: Is it deleterious in the context of craniofacial growth and appearance? This study was designed to address these questions. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing mandibular distraction by a single surgeon between 1989 and 2010 was conducted. Patients with "moderate" unilateral craniofacial microsomia (as defined by Pruzansky type I or IIa mandibles) and follow-up until craniofacial skeletal maturity were included for analysis. Patients were divided into two cohorts: satisfactory and unsatisfactory results based on photographic aesthetic evaluation by independent blinded observers at the initial presentation and at the age of skeletal maturity. Clinical variables were analyzed to detect predictors for satisfactory distraction. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included for analysis. The average age at distraction was 68.2 months and the average age at follow-up was 19.55 years. Thirteen patients (68.4 percent) had Pruzansky type IIA and six patients (31.6 percent) had Pruzansky type I mandibles. Twelve patients (63.2 percent) had satisfactory outcomes, whereas seven patients (36.8 percent) had unsatisfactory outcomes. Comparing the two cohorts, patients with satisfactory outcomes had distraction at an earlier age (56.4 months versus 89.8 months; p = 0.07) and a greater percentage overcorrection from craniofacial midline (41.7 percent versus 1.8 percent; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Mandibular distraction is successful in patients with mild to moderate dysmorphism, provided that there is a comprehensive clinical program emphasizing adequate mandibular bone stock, proper vector selection, planned overcorrection, and comprehensive orthodontic management. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

The Versatile Extended Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Flap for Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The thoracodorsal artery perforator (TAP) flap is a versatile tool that can be used to reconstruct the breast. The authors use preoperative perforator mapping using color Doppler ultrasonography and present a safe, efficient harvesting technique to demonstrate reliable use of the TAP flap in reconstructive surgery. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective review was performed on all patients undergoing TAP flap reconstruction from August 2011 to November 2014. Data were collected from patient records as well as outpatient interviews. RESULTS: A total of 106 TAP flaps were performed in 97 patients. The flaps were raised with either 1 perforator (42/106), 2 perforators (55/106), or three perforators (9/106), and turned as a propeller in 99 of 106 (93%) flaps or buried as a turnover in 7 of 106 (7%) of flaps. The mean operative time was 200 minutes (range, 60-485). Major complications occurred in 10 of 106 (10%) cases and included hematoma (1/108), venous congestion (2/108), and partial flap necrosis (7/108). The reconstructive goal was achieved in 103 of 106 (97%) flaps. CONCLUSIONS: The TAP flap is a pedicled, fasciocutaneous flap that can be used for total breast reconstruction as well as breast conserving surgery. This large, multicenter series describes our techniques of preoperative perforator mapping and a fast, reliable harvest. Reconstructive goals are accomplished in the great majority of patients.

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in blunt thoracic trauma: A study of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization database.

BACKGROUND: Reports documenting the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after blunt thoracic trauma are scarce. We used a large, multicenter database to examine outcomes when ECMO was used in treating patients with blunt thoracic trauma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of ECMO patients in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization database between 1998 and 2014. The diagnostic code for blunt pulmonary contusion (861.21, DRG International Classification of Diseases-9th Rev.) was used to identify patients treated with ECMO after blunt thoracic trauma. Variations of pre-ECMO respiratory support were also evaluated. The primary outcome was survival to discharge; the secondary outcome was hemorrhagic complication associated with ECMO. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients met inclusion criteria. The mean ± SEM age of the cohort was 28.9 ± 1.1 years; 71 (83.5%) were male. The mean ± SEM pre-ECMO PaO2/FIO2 ratio was 59.7 ± 3.5, and the mean ± SEM pre-ECMO length of ventilation was 94.7 ± 13.2 hours. Pre-ECMO support included inhaled nitric oxide (15 patients, 17.6%), high-frequency oscillation (10, 11.8%), and vasopressor agents (57, 67.1%). The mean ± SEM duration of ECMO was 207.4 ± 23.8 hours, and 63 patients (74.1%) were treated with venovenous ECMO. Thirty-two patients (37.6%) underwent invasive procedures before ECMO, and 12 patients (14.1%) underwent invasive procedures while on ECMO. Hemorrhagic complications occurred in 25 cases (29.4%), including 12 patients (14.1%) with surgical site bleeding and 16 (18.8%) with cannula site bleeding (6 patients had both). The rate of survival to discharge was 74.1%. Multivariate analysis showed that shorter duration of ECMO and the use of venovenous ECMO predicted survival. CONCLUSION: Outcomes after the use of ECMO in blunt thoracic trauma can be favorable. Some trauma patients are appropriate candidates for this therapy. Further study may discern which subpopulations of trauma patients will benefit most from ECMO. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management study, level V.