The impact of iron deficiency on patients under evaluation for colorectal cancer, a prospective cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Iron deficiency affects more than 60% of colorectal cancer patients at the time of diagnosis. Iron deficiency ultimately leads to anemia, but additionally, iron deficiency might impact other domains of colorectal cancer patients' health and well-being. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of iron deficiency on fatigue, quality of life, cognition, and physical ability in patients undergoing evaluation for colorectal cancer. METHODS: Multicenter, prospective, observational cross-sectional study (2021-2023). Fatigue was the primary outcome, measured using the Focused Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Anemia questionnaire (FACT-An). Quality of Life, Cognition, Aerobe capacity, mobility, and peripheral muscle strength were tested as secondary outcomes. Multivariate analysis was performed to estimate the impact of iron deficiency on all outcomes. RESULTS: Two hundred and one patients were analyzed, 57% being iron deficient. In multivariate regression analysis, iron deficiency was not associated with fatigue: FACT-An (r = -1.17, p = 0.57, 25% CI: -5.27 to 2.92). Results on quality of life, cognition, and mobility were non-significant and with small regression coefficients. Iron deficiency showed a nearly significant association with reduced hand-grip-strength (r = -3.47 kg, p = 0.06, 25%CI -7.03 to 0.08) and reduced 6 min walking distance (r = -40.36 m, p = 0.07, 25%CI: -84.73 to 4.00). CONCLUSION: Iron deficiency in patients undergoing evaluation for colorectal cancer was not associated with fatigue, quality of life, or cognition, but might affect aerobic endurance and peripheral muscle strength to a degree that is clinically relevant.

Steatotic liver disease is the most important somatic determinant of quality of life in patients with obesity: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) are often comorbid and stigmatized. This can negatively affect quality of life (QOL). Other studies have primarily used the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ), which focuses on liver-related symptoms, to characterize QOL, but most MASLD patients have only mild liver disease, and CLDQ might overlook QOL issues pertaining to them. We aimed to determine the impact of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) on QOL in obese patients using a 136-item generic QOL questionnaire. METHODS: We included participants with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 who all fully answered the sickness impact profile (SIP, range 0-100, normal = 3.4, 100 = worst) and had a liver biopsy to diagnose MASLD. Sociodemographics, comorbidity and biometric data were obtained from all participants. RESULTS: Of 176 (mean age 45.9 years, 70% female, 12.6 years of education), 132 had no-MASH and 44 MASH. On stepwise multivariable regression analysis, divorce (p = .011), unemployment (p < .003) and hepatic steatosis (p = .01) were associated with poor overall QOL. No other somatic comorbidity was associated. MASH patients more frequently than no-MASH reported physical discomfort (48% vs. 30%, p = .04), inability to do daily activities (29% vs. 54%, p = .006) and attention problems (32% vs. 57%, p = .003). CONCLUSION: MASLD severity was the only somatic determinant of QOL in patients with obesity in this cohort, and a large fraction reported debilitating symptoms. Patients and caregivers should consider the limitations this poses when planning interventions.

Advance care planning in chronic liver disease.

The Danish Health Authority recommends that all patients with life threatening disease, regardless of the diagnosis, are offered palliative care with respect for individual goals of care. Only few studies have investigated the evidence of ACP in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. This review defines ways to identify patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis in need of palliative care and how to analyse the goals of care. We present a strategy for ACP-conversations and how to implement these in the daily clinical work.

Knowledge needs in patients with Liver Disease: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge is essential for patients' disease management strategies and a critical component of healthcare. The importance of increasing patients level of knowledge has become more widely acknowledge in liver disease management in recent years, but further studies are needed to address patients experiences of unmet knowledge needs to develop appropriate patient education strategies. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore knowledge needs in patients' with liver disease of different etiology and severity. METHODS: A qualitative study was designed and an inductive method was chosen. Thirty-three patients with liver disease of different etiology and severity were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. Content analysis was used as an inspiration to describe and compare patients' needs for knowledge across disease etiology and severity. The reporting followed consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. RESULTS: The analysis generated three categories and nine subcategories. In general, the patients described lack of knowledge related to their liver disease, which made it difficult for them to manage their disease. Patients wished to be more involved in care and treatment of the liver disease. However, patients' had difficulties to assess and understand the importance of the information they received from healthcare professionals. Due to lack of knowledge, patients' had a misconception of the liver disease. Patients' had variation in knowledge needs depending on liver disease etiology and severity. CONCLUSION: Within liver disease management, knowledge of patients' experiences is vital to meet patients' knowledge needs and to develop appropriate patient education strategies. Therefore, it is important to ascertain a patient-centered approach to accommodate patients' individual knowledge needs, involve patients in care and treatment, and insure understanding to strengthen their self-management and give the patients the necessary skills to manage their disease and everyday life. REGISTRATION NUMBER: Open Science Framework registration DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/W28RC .

Mental Health, Quality of Life, and Stigmatization in Danish Patients with Liver Disease.

The mental health of patients with liver diseases is often overlooked when assessing their overall health and planning care and treatment. The aim of this study was to assess anxiety, depression, hopelessness, quality of life, and the perception of stigmatization in a large cohort of patients with chronic liver disease of different aetiology and severity, as well as to identify predictors associated with mental health disorders. A total of 340 patients completed a survey assessing mental health using the Beck Anxiety Inventory, the Beck Hopelessness Scale, and the Major Depression Inventory. Quality of life was measured with the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire and the European Quality-of-Life visual analogue scale. To assess stigmatization, validated questions from the Danish Nationwide Survey of Patient Experiences were used. Predictors associated with anxiety, hopelessness, and depression were analysed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Overall, 15% of the patients had moderate or severe anxiety, 3% had moderate or pronounced hopelessness, and 8% had moderate or severe depression. The prevalence of all three was highest in patients with cirrhosis and was associated with a low quality of life. More patients with cirrhosis had perceived stigmatization compared to patients with liver disease without cirrhosis, which affected their self-perception, and more than one-third of the patients refrained from telling others about their liver disease. The results emphasize the need for increased focus on mental health problems and awareness on preventing the discrimination of patients with liver disease.

Are Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Bone Mineral Density Associated? - A Cross-Sectional Study Using Liver Biopsy and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

There is controversy regarding the association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and osteoporosis. Our study aim was to assess bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD and examine if the severity of NAFLD affects BMD. A total of 147 adult women (n = 108) and men (n = 39) aged 18-76 years (mean ± standard deviation [SD] age 45.3 ± 12.5) were recruited in this cross-sectional study and underwent a liver biopsy and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). NAFLD activity score (NAS) based on the degree of steatosis, lobular inflammation and hepatocellular ballooning was used to assess NAFLD severity. The majority of subjects, 53%, had steatosis, 25% had nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) whereas 23% served as control subjects with no evidence of NAFLD. There were no significant differences in the lumbar spine (1.09 ± 0.12, 1.11 ± 0.18, and 1.12 ± 0.15 g/cm2, p = 0.69, in controls, steatosis, and NASH, respectively) or hip BMD (1.10 ± 0.15, 1.12 ± 0.13, and 1.09 ± 0.13 g/cm2, p = 0.48, in controls, steatosis, and NASH, respectively) between the groups. Adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, and diabetes in multiple regression models did not alter the results. There was no correlation between NAS and neither lumbar spine BMD (r = 0.06, p = 0.471), nor hip BMD (r = -0.03, p = 0.716). In conclusion, BMD was similar across the spectrum of NAFLD in both genders and not related to the severity of the underlying histological lesions, suggesting that neither steatosis nor NASH exerts a detrimental effect on BMD in these relatively young patients. © 2022 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.