The impact of a changed legislation on reporting of adverse drug reactions in Sweden, with focus on nurses' reporting.

PURPOSE: In March 2007, a legislative amendment was issued in Sweden compelling nurses to report all suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to the national pharmacovigilance system. The aims of this study were to describe the status of ADR reporting, before and after the implementation of the legislative changes, and to describe the general characteristics of suspected ADRs reported by nurses. METHODS: The Swedish pharmacovigilance system during the study period constituted six regional centres responsible for the handling of all spontaneous ADR reports within their region. In this study, we identified all individual ADR reports from 2005 and 2010, analysed in depth the ADR reports from two regional centres and collated information about the reporter and the nature of the reported ADR. RESULTS: From the two regional centres, a total of 898 and 1074 reports were submitted in 2005 and 2010 respectively. Nurses submitted 31% (275 reports) of the reports in 2005 and 24% (260 reports) in 2010. Nurses' reporting of serious ADRs was 3% (seven reports) in 2005 and 7% (17 reports) in 2010 with reporting of unlabelled ADRs at 4% (11 reports) in 2005 and 17% (45 reports) in 2010. Most of the serious and/or unlabelled reactions were related to vaccine administration (14 reports in 2005 and 36 reports in 2010). CONCLUSIONS: The overall ADR reporting by nurses did not appear to increase after the change in reporting legislation. The proportion of serious and/or unlabelled ADRs reported by nurses did however appear to increase during the same period. Taken together, our data suggests that further pro-active measures should be considered in order to involve nurses in the reporting of suspected ADRs.

Spontaneously reported adverse reactions in association with complementary and alternative medicine substances in Sweden.

PURPOSE: Although the safety information is limited, use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) products is not without risks. Spontaneous reporting systems may be used in the surveillance of these products. We describe the pattern of spontaneously reported CAM related adverse reactions submitted to the Swedish Medical Products Agency (MPA) and highlight areas of safety concern. METHODS: All adverse reactions spontaneously reported to MPA between 1987 and 2006, where at least one CAM substance was a suspected agent, were scrutinised. From each report information about the patient, adverse reaction/s, drug treatment/s, dosage, time relationship and outcome was retrieved. RESULTS: Among a total of 64 493 reports, 778 reports concerned 967 suspected adverse reactions related to 175 different CAM products. The main distribution of suspected adverse reactions was: urticaria (8.3%), exanthema (7.4%) and contact dermatitis (5.7%). The most reported CAM substances were purple coneflower (Echinacea purpurea) (8.1%), purple coneflower + siberian ginseng (Eleutherococcus senticosus) + malabar nut (Adhatoda vasica) (7.3%) and ginkgo leaf (Ginkgo biloba) (6.7%). In 221 reports, at least one reaction was categorised as serious, the most frequent being pulmonary embolism (1.7%), mixed liver reaction (2.8%), and anaphylactic reaction (2.0%). Eleven of the serious adverse reactions had a fatal outcome. CONCLUSIONS: CAM substances were associated with a variety of adverse reactions. Some of these have previously been unrecognised or poorly documented and suggest further investigations. By stimulating the reporting of adverse reactions of CAM products, the signal detection power of the spontaneous reporting system may increase further.

Cerebral haemorrhage induced by warfarin - the influence of drug-drug interactions.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the frequency, severity and preventability of warfarin-induced cerebral haemorrhages due to warfarin and warfarin-drug interactions in patients living in the county of Ostergötland, Sweden. METHODS: All patients with a diagnosed cerebral haemorrhage at three hospitals during the period 2000-2002 were identified. Medical records were studied retrospectively to evaluate whether warfarin and warfarin-drug interactions could have caused the cerebral haemorrhage. The proportion of possibly avoidable cases due to drug interactions was estimated. RESULTS: Among 593 patients with cerebral haemorrhage, 59 (10%) were assessed as related to warfarin treatment. This imply an incidence of 1.7/100,000 treatment years. Of the 59 cases, 26 (44%) had a fatal outcome, compared to 136 (25%) among the non-warfarin patients (p < 0.01). A warfarin-drug interaction could have contributed to the haemorrhage in 24 (41%) of the warfarin patients and in 7 of these (12%) the bleeding complication was considered being possible to avoid. CONCLUSIONS: Warfarin-induced cerebral haemorrhages are a major clinical problem with a high fatality rate. Almost half of the cases was related to a warfarin-drug interaction. A significant proportion of warfarin-related cerebral haemorrhages might have been prevented if greater caution had been taken when prescribing drugs known to interact with warfarin.