Comparison of Spatial Modelling Approaches on PM10 and NO2 Concentration Variations: A Case Study in Surabaya City, Indonesia.

Because of fast-paced industrialization, urbanization, and population growth in Indonesia, there are serious health issues in the country resulting from air pollution. This study uses geospatial modelling technologies, namely land-use regression (LUR), geographically weighted regression (GWR), and geographic and temporal weighted regression (GTWR) models, to assess variations in particulate matter (PM10) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations in Surabaya City, Indonesia. This is the first study to implement spatiotemporal variability of air pollution concentrations in Surabaya City, Indonesia. To develop the prediction models, air pollution data collected from seven monitoring stations from 2010 to 2018 were used as dependent variables, while land-use/land cover allocations within a 250 m to 5000 m circular buffer range surrounding the monitoring stations were collected as independent variables. A supervised stepwise variable selection procedure was applied to identify the important predictor variables for developing the LUR, GWR, and GTWR models. The developed models of LUR, GWR, and GTWR accounted for 49%, 50%, and 51% of PM10 variations and 46%, 47%, and 48% of NO2 variations, respectively. The GTWR model performed better (R2 = 0.51 for PM10 and 0.48 for NO2) than the other two models (R2 = 0.49-0.50 for PM10 and 0.46-0.47 for NO2), LUR and GWR. In the PM10 model four predictor variables, public facility, industry and warehousing, paddy field, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), were selected during the variable selection procedure. Meanwhile, paddy field, residential area, rainfall, and temperature played important roles in explaining NO2 variations. Because of biomass burning issues in South Asia, the paddy field, which has a positive correlation with PM10 and NO2, was selected as a predictor. By using long-term monitoring data to establish prediction models, this model may better depict PM10 and NO2 concentration variations within areas across Asia.

Spectral and spatial kernel water quality mapping.

An empirical approach through remote sensing generally produces a robust data model of water quality for inland and coastal water. Traditional regressions in water quality mapping fail because the bio-optical relationship of turbid water exhibits nonlinear and heterogeneous patterns. In addition, in situ data are generally insufficient in the water quality mapping. Mapping based on a relatively small amount of water quality samples is considered a practical issue in environmental monitoring. Learning-based algorithms that require a large amount of data are inapplicable in this case. According to the concept of Nadaraya-Watson estimator, the kernel model can estimate nonlinear and spatially varying water quality maps effectively in turbid water.Experiments indicate that the kernel estimator provides better goodness-of-fit between the observed and derived concentrations of water quality parameter, e.g., chlorophyll-a in turbid water. The kernel estimator is feasible for a relatively small size of ground observations. Approximately 30% improvement of cross-validation error was identified in this approach when compared with traditional regressions. The model offers a robust approach without further calibrations for estimating the spatial patterns of water quality by using remote sensing reflectance and a small set of observations, considering spatial and spectral information, e.g., multiple bands and band ratios.